IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stabio/v12y2020i2d10.1007_s12561-020-09267-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bayesian Method for the Detection of Proof of Concept in Early Phase Oncology Studies with a Basket Design

Author

Listed:
  • Jin Jin

    (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)

  • Qianying Liu

    (Sanofi)

  • Wei Zheng

    (Kehang Info and Tech Ltd)

  • Zhenming Shun

    (Daiichi Sankyo)

  • Tun Tun Lin

    (Sanofi)

  • Lei Gao

    (Vertex Pharmaceuticals)

  • Yingwen Dong

    (Sanofi)

Abstract

In the clinical drug development, proof of clinical concept (PoC) refers to the evidence of treatment efficacy that is obtained from early phase clinical studies. PoC is critical, as it motivates the initiation of late stage clinical trials, and has a profound impact on the “Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls” (CMC) process, which is preferably launched as early as possible so as to save valuable time for drug development. A new type of oncology clinical trial called basket trial has emerged recently, where the experimental treatment targets on a specific oncogenic pathway that is hypothesized to modulate tumor growth and/or metastasis, and patients with potentially multiple cancer types can be enrolled. The problem of PoC in basket trials has not been formally investigated in the statistical literature. In early phase basket trials, the commonly used independent analysis lacks statistical power of detecting PoC due to limited sample size. A more powerful approach is needed, especially when the treatment effect is not strong enough for each individual cancer type. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for PoC detection in the early phase basket trials under a Bayesian framework. We classify cancer types into a “sensitive subgroup” that responds positively to the treatment, and an “insensitive subgroup” that does not respond to the treatment. We then assess PoC using the posterior probability that at least one cancer type is sensitive. Simulation results show that our proposed approach has a promising performance, with considerable gain in power compared with the independent approach when a relatively large number of the cancer types are sensitive to the treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin Jin & Qianying Liu & Wei Zheng & Zhenming Shun & Tun Tun Lin & Lei Gao & Yingwen Dong, 2020. "A Bayesian Method for the Detection of Proof of Concept in Early Phase Oncology Studies with a Basket Design," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 12(2), pages 167-179, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stabio:v:12:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s12561-020-09267-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s12561-020-09267-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12561-020-09267-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12561-020-09267-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anirudh Prahallad & Chong Sun & Sidong Huang & Federica Di Nicolantonio & Ramon Salazar & Davide Zecchin & Roderick L. Beijersbergen & Alberto Bardelli & René Bernards, 2012. "Unresponsiveness of colon cancer to BRAF(V600E) inhibition through feedback activation of EGFR," Nature, Nature, vol. 483(7387), pages 100-103, March.
    2. Yiyi Chu & Ying Yuan, 2018. "BLAST: Bayesian latent subgroup design for basket trials accounting for patient heterogeneity," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(3), pages 723-740, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bo Huang & Naitee Ting, 2020. "Introduction to Special Issue on ‘Statistical Methods for Cancer Immunotherapy’," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 12(2), pages 79-82, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mathurin Dorel & Bertram Klinger & Tommaso Mari & Joern Toedling & Eric Blanc & Clemens Messerschmidt & Michal Nadler-Holly & Matthias Ziehm & Anja Sieber & Falk Hertwig & Dieter Beule & Angelika Egge, 2021. "Neuroblastoma signalling models unveil combination therapies targeting feedback-mediated resistance," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-26, November.
    2. Gholamreza Safaee Ardekani & Seyed Mehdi Jafarnejad & Larry Tan & Ardavan Saeedi & Gang Li, 2012. "The Prognostic Value of BRAF Mutation in Colorectal Cancer and Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-10, October.
    3. Luke O. Ouma & Michael J. Grayling & James M. S. Wason & Haiyan Zheng, 2022. "Bayesian modelling strategies for borrowing of information in randomised basket trials," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 2014-2037, November.
    4. Liyun Jiang & Lei Nie & Ying Yuan, 2023. "Elastic priors to dynamically borrow information from historical data in clinical trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 49-60, March.
    5. David Gonzalez-Martinez & Lee Roth & Thomas R. Mumford & Juan Guan & Anh Le & Robert C. Doebele & Bo Huang & Asmin Tulpule & Magdalena Niewiadomska-Bugaj & Trever G. Bivona & Lukasz J. Bugaj, 2024. "Oncogenic EML4-ALK assemblies suppress growth factor perception and modulate drug tolerance," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Yujie Zhao & Rui (Sammi) Tang & Yeting Du & Ying Yuan, 2023. "A Bayesian platform trial design to simultaneously evaluate multiple drugs in multiple indications with mixed endpoints," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 1459-1471, June.
    7. Francesca Menghi & Edison T. Liu, 2022. "Functional genomics of complex cancer genomes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-4, December.
    8. Ke Gong & Gao Guo & Nicole A. Beckley & Xiaoyao Yang & Yue Zhang & David E. Gerber & John D. Minna & Sandeep Burma & Dawen Zhao & Esra A. Akbay & Amyn A. Habib, 2021. "Comprehensive targeting of resistance to inhibition of RTK signaling pathways by using glucocorticoids," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stabio:v:12:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s12561-020-09267-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.