IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ssefpa/v8y2016i3d10.1007_s12571-016-0579-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable smallholder poultry interventions to promote food security and social, agricultural, and ecological resilience in the Luangwa Valley, Zambia

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah E. Dumas

    (Cornell University
    Cornell University)

  • Luke Lungu

    (Wildlife Conservation Society)

  • Nathan Mulambya

    (Wildlife Conservation Society)

  • Whiteson Daka

    (Wildlife Conservation Society)

  • Erin McDonald

    (Cornell University)

  • Emily Steubing

    (Cornell University)

  • Tamika Lewis

    (Cornell University)

  • Katherine Backel

    (Cornell University)

  • Jarra Jange

    (Cornell University)

  • Benjamin Lucio-Martinez

    (Cornell University)

  • Dale Lewis

    (Wildlife Conservation Society)

  • Alexander J. Travis

    (Cornell University
    Cornell University)

Abstract

In Zambia’s Luangwa Valley, highly variable rainfall and lack of education, agricultural inputs, and market access constrain agricultural productivity, trapping smallholder farmers in chronic poverty and food insecurity. Human and animal disease (e.g. HIV and Newcastle Disease, respectively), further threaten the resilience of poor families. To cope with various shocks and stressors, many farmers employ short-term coping strategies that threaten ecosystem resilience. Community Markets for Conservation (COMACO) utilizes an agribusiness model to alleviate poverty and food insecurity through conservation farming, market development and value-added food production. COMACO promotes household, agricultural and ecological resilience along two strategic lines: improving recovery from shocks (mitigation) and reducing the risk of shock occurrence. Here we focus on two of COMACO’s poultry interventions and present data showing that addressing health and management constraints within the existing village poultry system resulted in significantly improved productivity and profitability. However, once reliable productivity was achieved, farmers preferred to sell chickens rather than eat either the birds or their eggs. Sales of live birds were largely outside the community to avoid price suppression; in contrast, the sale of eggs from community-operated, semi-intensive egg production facilities was invariably within the communities. These facilities resulted in significant increases in both producer income and community consumption of eggs. This intervention therefore has the potential to improve not only producers’ economic resilience, but also resilience tied to the food security and physical health of the entire community.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah E. Dumas & Luke Lungu & Nathan Mulambya & Whiteson Daka & Erin McDonald & Emily Steubing & Tamika Lewis & Katherine Backel & Jarra Jange & Benjamin Lucio-Martinez & Dale Lewis & Alexander J. Tra, 2016. "Sustainable smallholder poultry interventions to promote food security and social, agricultural, and ecological resilience in the Luangwa Valley, Zambia," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(3), pages 507-520, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:8:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s12571-016-0579-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s12571-016-0579-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12571-016-0579-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12571-016-0579-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hao Yuan Chan & Sarina Abdul Halim-Lim & Tai Boon Tan & Nitty Hirawaty Kamarulzaman & Adi Ainurzaman Jamaludin & Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, 2020. "Exploring the Drivers and the Interventions towards Sustainable Food Security in the Food Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-27, September.
    2. Wipas Loengbudnark & Vibuntita Chankitisakul & Monchai Duangjinda & Wuttigrai Boonkum, 2024. "Sustainable Growth through Thai Native Chicken Farming: Lessons from Rural Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Verena Nüchter & David J. Abson & Henrik von Wehrden & John-Oliver Engler, 2021. "The Concept of Resilience in Recent Sustainability Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Jenny-Ann Toribio & Richard Markham & Lucy Carter & Archie Law & Robyn Alders & Michael Dibley & Merrilyn Walton & Lucas Shuttleworth & David Guest, 2018. "Research for development to improve health outcomes from agriculture for rural communities: what is needed?," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(3), pages 661-675, June.
    5. Nuhu, Ahmed Salim & Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O. & Awokuse, Titus & Kabwe, Stephen, 2021. "Do benefits of expanded midstream activities in crop value chains accrue to smallholder farmers? Evidence from Zambia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    6. Bernard Pelletier & Gordon M. Hickey & Kimberly L. Bothi & Andrew Mude, 2016. "Linking rural livelihood resilience and food security: an international challenge," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(3), pages 469-476, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:8:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s12571-016-0579-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.