Author
Abstract
Maintaining Australia’s status as a major food exporter requires ongoing protection of its cropping industries from exotic pests and diseases. The number of pests classified as high priority threats to Australia’s plant industries now stands at over 300 (Plant Health Australia Annual Report 2014 ). It is often stated that Australia’s geographic isolation provides a natural barrier from many exotic pests that could damage plant production industries and the unique natural environment. Isolation, however, is not enough given that pests can enter through natural means or by being brought into the country with the increasing movements of people and goods. In an increasingly globalised world economy, Australia relies on a rigorous biosecurity system operated in partnership between governments and industry to mitigate risks from exotic pests. Steadily increasing trade volumes and passenger travel, global movements of serious pests, particularly into neighbouring countries, and the emergence of new and variant species of pests, will continue to test already stretched biosecurity capabilities. Plant Health Australia (PHA) provides the centrepiece of a unique system that manages the national preparedness and response for exotic plant pest incursions in Australia. PHA is a public company that facilitates decision making and funding for effective responses to emergency plant pests. PHA also independently advocates and adds value to, Australia’s national biosecurity system. Utilising the Emergency Plant Pest Response Deed (EPPRD), a legal agreement that brings together governments and industries in formal response arrangements, PHA ensures that national incursion responses are timely, science based, transparent and effective, with the aim of maintaining supply of quality clean food. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and International Society for Plant Pathology 2016
Suggested Citation
Greg Fraser, 2016.
"Biosecurity and food security—effective mechanisms for public-private partnerships,"
Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(1), pages 83-87, February.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:83-87
DOI: 10.1007/s12571-015-0535-9
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:83-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.