IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v91y2012i2d10.1007_s11192-011-0574-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping interactions within the evolving science of science and innovation policy community

Author

Listed:
  • Angela M. Zoss

    (Indiana University)

  • Katy Börner

    (Indiana University)

Abstract

The Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) program at the National Science Foundation (NSF) supports research designed to advance the scientific basis of science and innovation policy. The program was established at NSF in 2005 in response to a call from Dr. John Marburger III, then science advisor to the U.S. President, for a “science” of science policy. As of January 2011, it has co-funded 162 awards that aim to develop, improve, and expand data, analytical tools, and models that can be directly applied in the science policy decision making process. The long-term goals of the SciSIP program are to provide a scientifically rigorous and quantitative basis for science policy and to establish an international community of practice. The program has an active listserv that, as of January 2011, has almost 700 members from academia, government, and industry. This study analyzed all SciSIP awards (through January 2011) to identify existing collaboration networks and co-funding relations between SciSIP and other areas of science. In addition, listserv data was downloaded and analyzed to derive complementary discourse information. Key results include evidence of rich diversity in communication and funding networks and effective strategies for interlinking researcher and science policy makers, prompting discussion, and resource sharing.

Suggested Citation

  • Angela M. Zoss & Katy Börner, 2012. "Mapping interactions within the evolving science of science and innovation policy community," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(2), pages 631-644, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:91:y:2012:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-011-0574-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0574-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-011-0574-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-011-0574-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Staša Milojević, 2010. "Power law distributions in information science: Making the case for logarithmic binning," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(12), pages 2417-2425, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Teich, Albert H., 2018. "In Search of Evidence-based Science Policy: From the Endless Frontier to SciSIP," Annals of Science and Technology Policy, now publishers, vol. 2(2), pages 75-199, June.
    2. Chris W. Belter, 2013. "A bibliometric analysis of NOAA’s Office of Ocean Exploration and Research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(2), pages 629-644, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Wenjun & Pan, Lin & Yuan, Ning & Zhang, Sen & Liu, Dong, 2015. "A comparative analysis of intra-city human mobility by taxi," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 420(C), pages 134-147.
    2. Milojević, Staša & Radicchi, Filippo & Bar-Ilan, Judit, 2017. "Citation success index − An intuitive pair-wise journal comparison metric," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 223-231.
    3. Guillermo Armando Ronda-Pupo, 2017. "The citation-based impact of complex innovation systems scales with the size of the system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(1), pages 141-151, July.
    4. Leo Egghe & Ronald Rousseau, 2012. "Theory and practice of the shifted Lotka function," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(1), pages 295-301, April.
    5. Sahasranaman, Anand & Bettencourt, Luís M.A., 2021. "Life between the city and the village: Scaling analysis of service access in Indian urban slums," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    6. Guillermo Armando Ronda-Pupo & J. Sylvan Katz, 2018. "The power law relationship between citation impact and multi-authorship patterns in articles in Information Science & Library Science journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(3), pages 919-932, March.
    7. Liu, Hao-Ran & Li, Ming-Xia & Zhou, Wei-Xing, 2024. "Visibility graph analysis of the grains and oilseeds indices," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 650(C).
    8. Chen, Li & Zheng, Linjiang & Xia, Li & Liu, Weining & Sun, Dihua, 2021. "Detecting and analyzing unlicensed taxis: A case study of Chongqing City," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 584(C).
    9. José Luis Ortega, 2015. "How is an academic social site populated? A demographic study of Google Scholar Citations population," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(1), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Necmi Gürsakal & Sadullah Çelik & Serkan Özdemir, 2023. "High-frequency words have higher frequencies in Turkish social sciences article," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1865-1887, April.
    11. Wang, Wenjun & Yuan, Ning & Pan, Lin & Jiao, Pengfei & Dai, Weidi & Xue, Guixiang & Liu, Dong, 2015. "Temporal patterns of emergency calls of a metropolitan city in China," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 436(C), pages 846-855.
    12. Hongguang Dong & Menghui Li & Ru Liu & Chensheng Wu & Jinshan Wu, 2017. "Allometric scaling in scientific fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(1), pages 583-594, July.
    13. Tomaz Bartol & Karmen Stopar, 2015. "Nano language and distribution of article title terms according to power laws," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(2), pages 435-451, May.
    14. Mu-Hsuan Huang & Yu-Wei Chang, 2012. "A comparative study of interdisciplinary changes between information science and library science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(3), pages 789-803, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:91:y:2012:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-011-0574-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.