IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v67y2006i1d10.1556_scient.67.2006.1.8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Creative knowledge environments for research groups in biotechnology. The influence of leadership and organizational support in universities and business companies

Author

Listed:
  • Sven Hemlin

    (The Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg University)

Abstract

Summary This study analysed how leadership and organizational support (LOS) influences creative knowledge environments for research groups in biotechnology. A questionnaire distributed to 90 (97% responding) university and business company researchers resulted in that leadership was rated higher than organizational support. First, leaders were more important to creativity than organizational support. Secondly, LOS differed to a limited extent between members and leaders, universities and business companies and excellent and less excellent groups. Thirdly, working freedom was rated higher in universities than in business companies. Fourthly, group members perceived they were more encouraged to think freely in comparison to their group leaders. Finally, innovation goals were more pronounced in excellent than less excellent groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Sven Hemlin, 2006. "Creative knowledge environments for research groups in biotechnology. The influence of leadership and organizational support in universities and business companies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 67(1), pages 121-142, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:67:y:2006:i:1:d:10.1556_scient.67.2006.1.8
    DOI: 10.1556/Scient.67.2006.1.8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1556/Scient.67.2006.1.8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1556/Scient.67.2006.1.8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xuan Zhen Liu & Hui Fang, 2014. "Scientific group leaders’ authorship preferences: an empirical investigation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 909-925, February.
    2. Mladen Djuric & Marina Dobrota & Jovan Filipovic, 2020. "Complexity-based quality indicators for human and social capital in science and research: the case of Serbian Homeland versus Diaspora," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(1), pages 303-328, July.
    3. José L. Ballesteros-Rodríguez & Nieves L. Díaz-Díaz & Inmaculada Aguiar-Díaz & Petra De Saá-Pérez, 2020. "The Role of Leadership in the Management of Conflict and Knowledge Sharing in the Research Groups of a Spanish Public University," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 421-436, June.
    4. Svein Kyvik & Ingvild Reymert, 2017. "Research collaboration in groups and networks: differences across academic fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 951-967, November.
    5. Andrej Kastrin & Jelena Klisara & Borut Lužar & Janez Povh, 2018. "Is science driven by principal investigators?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(2), pages 1157-1182, November.
    6. Wei Zhang & Yongli Li & Wenyao Zhang & Shengli Dai, 2019. "Social network evolution in creative process of CNPD teams: a case study of Chinese companies," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 143-181, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:67:y:2006:i:1:d:10.1556_scient.67.2006.1.8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.