IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v56y2003i3d10.1023_a1022318618200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating two Austrian university departments: Lessons learned

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Schloegl

    (University of Graz, Department of Information Science)

  • Juan Gorraiz

    (University of Graz)

  • Christoph Bart

    (University of Graz)

  • Monika Bargmann

    (University of Graz)

Abstract

This paper describes various problems which may occur in quantitative research evaluation. It is shown that problems already arise when trying to define such seemingly simple scientometric elements as “personnel” or “budget”. This has major consequences on the construction of indicators. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that different data sources as well as different data and indicators result in different, sometimes even contradicting outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Schloegl & Juan Gorraiz & Christoph Bart & Monika Bargmann, 2003. "Evaluating two Austrian university departments: Lessons learned," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 56(3), pages 289-299, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:56:y:2003:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1022318618200
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1022318618200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1022318618200
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1022318618200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Péter Vinkler, 2001. "An attempt for defining some basic categories of scientometrics and classifying the indicators of evaluative scientometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 50(3), pages 539-544, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mu-Hsuan Huang & Han-Wen Chang & Dar-Zen Chen, 2006. "Research evaluation of research-oriented universities in Taiwan from 1993 to 2003," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 67(3), pages 419-435, June.
    2. Chiang Kao & Hwei-Lan Pao, 2009. "An evaluation of research performance in management of 168 Taiwan universities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 78(2), pages 261-277, February.
    3. Hui-Zhen Fu & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2013. "Comparison of independent research of China’s top universities using bibliometric indicators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 96(1), pages 259-276, July.
    4. B. S. Kademani & Vijai Kumar & Ganesh Surwase & Anil Sagar & Lalit Mohan & Anil Kumar & C. R. Gaderao, 2007. "Research and citation impact of publications by the Chemistry Division at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 71(1), pages 25-57, April.
    5. Gregory John Lee, 2010. "Assessing publication performance of research units: extensions through operational research and economic techniques," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(3), pages 717-734, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Péter Vinkler, 2009. "Introducing the Current Contribution Index for characterizing the recent, relevant impact of journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 79(2), pages 409-420, May.
    2. Péter Vinkler, 2003. "Relations of relative scientometric indicators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 58(3), pages 687-694, November.
    3. Bar-Ilan, Judit, 2008. "Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 1-52.
    4. Ming-Yueh Tsay, 2009. "An analysis and comparison of scientometric data between journals of physics, chemistry and engineering," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 78(2), pages 279-293, February.
    5. O. Mryglod & R. Kenna & Yu. Holovatch & B. Berche, 2013. "Absolute and specific measures of research group excellence," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(1), pages 115-127, April.
    6. Péter Vinkler, 2019. "Core journals and elite subsets in scientometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(1), pages 241-259, October.
    7. Mingyang Wang & Shijia Jiao & Kah-Hin Chai & Guangsheng Chen, 2019. "Building journal’s long-term impact: using indicators detected from the sustained active articles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(1), pages 261-283, October.
    8. Vinkler, Péter, 2013. "Would it be possible to increase the Hirsch-index, π-index or CDS-index by increasing the number of publications or citations only by unity?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 72-83.
    9. Ronald Rousseau, 2002. "Lack of standardisation in informetric research. Comments on “Power laws of research output. Evidence for journals of economics” by Matthias Sutter and Martin G. Kocher," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 55(2), pages 317-327, August.
    10. Péter Vinkler, 2011. "Application of the distribution of citations among publications in scientometric evaluations," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(10), pages 1963-1978, October.
    11. O. Mryglod & R. Kenna & Yu. Holovatch & B. Berche, 2013. "Comparison of a citation-based indicator and peer review for absolute and specific measures of research-group excellence," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 97(3), pages 767-777, December.
    12. Peter Vinkler, 2018. "Structure of the scientific research and science policy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 737-756, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:56:y:2003:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1022318618200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.