IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v50y2001i1d10.1023_a1005690102069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bibliometrics and internet: Some observations and expectations

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony F.J. van Raan

    (University of Leiden)

Abstract

Electronic publishing developments and new information technology in general will affect the main functions of scientific communication. Most changes however will be primarily technological but not conceptual. Publication via journals of high reputation is in most fields of science crucial to receive professional recognition. That will remain so in the ihelectronic erale. A much more revolutionary change in science will be the increasing availability and sharing of research data.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony F.J. van Raan, 2001. "Bibliometrics and internet: Some observations and expectations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 50(1), pages 59-63, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:50:y:2001:i:1:d:10.1023_a:1005690102069
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1005690102069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1005690102069
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1005690102069?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E. C. M. Noyons & A. F. J. van Raan, 1998. "Monitoring scientific developments from a dynamic perspective: Self‐organized structuring to map neural network research," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 49(1), pages 68-81.
    2. Hans E Roosendaal, 1995. "Roles of bibliometrics in scientific communication," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 5(3), pages 237-241, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. András Schubert, 2002. "The Web of Scientometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 53(1), pages 3-20, January.
    2. Mike Thelwall & Rong Tang & Liz Price, 2003. "Linguistic patterns of academic Web use in Western Europe," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 56(3), pages 417-432, March.
    3. Mike Thelwall, 2012. "Journal impact evaluation: a webometric perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(2), pages 429-441, August.
    4. Marco Pleßner, 2017. "The disposition effect: a survey," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 67(1), pages 1-30, February.
    5. Cristina Faba-Pérez & Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote & Félix De Moya-Anegón, 2003. "Data mining in a closed Web environment," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 58(3), pages 623-640, November.
    6. Bar-Ilan, Judit, 2008. "Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 1-52.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cathelijn J. F. Waaijer & Cornelis A. Bochove & Nees Jan Eck, 2011. "On the map: Nature and Science editorials," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(1), pages 99-112, January.
    2. Seongkyoon Jeong & Jong-Chan Kim & Jae Young Choi, 2015. "Technology convergence: What developmental stage are we in?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(3), pages 841-871, September.
    3. Gregory G. Brunk, 2003. "Swarming of innovations, fractal patterns, and the historical time series of US patents," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 56(1), pages 61-80, January.
    4. S. Ravikumar & Ashutosh Agrahari & S. N. Singh, 2015. "Mapping the intellectual structure of scientometrics: a co-word analysis of the journal Scientometrics (2005–2010)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 929-955, January.
    5. Xu, Haiyun & Winnink, Jos & Yue, Zenghui & Liu, Ziqiang & Yuan, Guoting, 2020. "Topic-linked innovation paths in science and technology," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(2).
    6. Ismael Rafols & Alan Porter & Loet Leydesdorff, 2009. "Overlay Maps of Science: a New Tool for Research Policy," SPRU Working Paper Series 179, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    7. Mario Coccia, 2019. "How do scientific disciplines evolve in applied sciences? The properties of scientific fission and ambidextrous scientific drivers," Papers 1911.05363, arXiv.org.
    8. Eric J. Iversen & Aris Kaloudis, "undated". "The changing role of patents and publishing in basic and applied modes of organised research," STEP Report series 199906, The STEP Group, Studies in technology, innovation and economic policy.
    9. Pei-Chun Lee & Hsin-Ning Su & Te-Yi Chan, 2010. "Assessment of ontology-based knowledge network formation by Vector-Space Model," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(3), pages 689-703, December.
    10. E. C. M. Noyons & H. F. Moed & A. F. J. Raan, 1999. "Integrating research performance analysis and science mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 46(3), pages 591-604, November.
    11. Mario Coccia, 2020. "The evolution of scientific disciplines in applied sciences: dynamics and empirical properties of experimental physics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(1), pages 451-487, July.
    12. Corrocher Nicoletta & Malerba Franco & Montobbio Fabio, 2003. "The emergence of new technologies in the ICT field: main actors, geographical distribution and knowledge sources," Economics and Quantitative Methods qf0317, Department of Economics, University of Insubria.
    13. Corrocher, Nicoletta & Malerba, Franco & Montobbio, Fabio, 2007. "Schumpeterian patterns of innovative activity in the ICT field," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 418-432, April.
    14. van Eck, N.J.P. & Waltman, L., 2008. "Bibliometric Mapping of the Computational Intelligence Field," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2008-015-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    15. Staša Milojević & Cassidy R. Sugimoto & Erjia Yan & Ying Ding, 2011. "The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science: Analysis of article title words," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(10), pages 1933-1953, October.
    16. Noyons, E. C. M. & Luwel, M. & Moed, H. F., 1998. "Assessment of Flemish R&D in the field of information technology: A bibliometric evaluation based on publication and patent data, combined with OECD research input statistics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 285-300, July.
    17. Bangrae Lee & Yong-Il Jeong, 2008. "Mapping Korea’s national R&D domain of robot technology by using the co-word analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 77(1), pages 3-19, October.
    18. Jochen Gläser & Wolfgang Glänzel & Andrea Scharnhorst, 2017. "Same data—different results? Towards a comparative approach to the identification of thematic structures in science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(2), pages 981-998, May.
    19. Bonaccorsi, Andrea & Vargas, Juan, 2010. "Proliferation dynamics in new sciences," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 1034-1050, October.
    20. Yuen-Hsien Tseng & Yu-I Lin & Yi-Yang Lee & Wen-Chi Hung & Chun-Hsiang Lee, 2009. "A comparison of methods for detecting hot topics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 81(1), pages 73-90, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:50:y:2001:i:1:d:10.1023_a:1005690102069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.