IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v49y2000i3d10.1023_a1010529405152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scientometrics of Prolific and Non-Prolific Authors in Laser Science and Technology

Author

Listed:
  • K. C. Garg

    (National Institute of Science)

  • P. Padhi

    (Utkal University, Vani Vihar, Bhubaneswar)

Abstract

An analysis of 766 publications by prolific authors in scientific journals indicate that prolific authors produce about 25% of the total scientific output in periodical literature in laser science and technology. The average productivity per author is about 2. Prolific authors from most of the countries belonged either to academic or research institutions except in USA and Japan. Prolific authors on average made more impact than non-prolific authors. However the situation varied from country to country.

Suggested Citation

  • K. C. Garg & P. Padhi, 2000. "Scientometrics of Prolific and Non-Prolific Authors in Laser Science and Technology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 49(3), pages 359-371, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:49:y:2000:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1010529405152
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1010529405152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1010529405152
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1010529405152?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K. C. Garg & P. Padhi, 1999. "Scientometrics of laser research literature as viewed through the Journal of Current Laser Abstracts," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 45(2), pages 251-268, June.
    2. K. C. Garg & P. Padhi, 1999. "Scientometrics of institutional productivity of laser science and technology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 46(1), pages 19-38, September.
    3. Noyons, E. C. M. & van Raan, A. F. J. & Grupp, H. & Schmoch, U., 1994. "Exploring the science and technology interface: inventor-author relations in laser medicine research," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 443-457, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hajime Eto, 2008. "Scientometric definition of science: In what respect is the humanities more scientific than mathematical and social sciences?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 76(1), pages 23-42, July.
    2. Yu-Wei Chang, 2021. "Characteristics of high research performance authors in the field of library and information science and those of their articles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3373-3391, April.
    3. K. C. Garg & P. Padhi, 2002. "Scientometrics of laser research in India during 1970-1994," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 55(2), pages 215-241, August.
    4. K.C. Garg & P. Padhi, 2001. "A study of collaboration in laser science and technology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 51(2), pages 415-427, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. K.C. Garg & P. Padhi, 2001. "A study of collaboration in laser science and technology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 51(2), pages 415-427, June.
    2. K. C. Garg & P. Padhi, 2002. "Scientometrics of laser research in India during 1970-1994," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 55(2), pages 215-241, August.
    3. B. M. Gupta & S. M. Dhawan, 2009. "Status of physics research in India: An analysis of research output during 1993–2001," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 78(2), pages 295-316, February.
    4. K. C. Garg, 2003. "An overview of cross-national, national, and institutional assessment as reflected in the international journal Scientometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 56(2), pages 169-199, January.
    5. R. Karpagam & S. Gopalakrishnan & M. Natarajan & B. Ramesh Babu, 2011. "Mapping of nanoscience and nanotechnology research in India: a scientometric analysis, 1990–2009," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 89(2), pages 501-522, November.
    6. R. J. W. Tussen & R. K. Buter & Th. N. van Leeuwen, 2000. "Technological Relevance of Science: An Assessment of Citation Linkages between Patents and Research Papers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 47(2), pages 389-412, February.
    7. Subramanian, Annapoornima M. & Lim, Kwanghui & Soh, Pek-Hooi, 2013. "When birds of a feather don’t flock together: Different scientists and the roles they play in biotech R&D alliances," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 595-612.
    8. Boyack, Kevin W. & Klavans, Richard, 2008. "Measuring science–technology interaction using rare inventor–author names," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 173-182.
    9. Kudic, Muhamed & Pyka, Andreas & Sunder, Marco, 2013. "Network Formation: R&D Cooperation Propensity and Timing Among German Laser Source Manufacturers," IWH Discussion Papers 9/2013, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    10. Tijssen, Robert J. W., 2001. "Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 35-54, January.
    11. Meyer, Martin, 2006. "Are patenting scientists the better scholars?: An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 1646-1662, December.
    12. K. C. Garg & P. Padhi, 1999. "Scientometrics of laser research literature as viewed through the Journal of Current Laser Abstracts," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 45(2), pages 251-268, June.
    13. M. M. S. Karki & K. C. Garg & Praveen Sharma, 2000. "Activity and Growth of Organic Chemistry Research in India During 1971–1989," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 49(2), pages 279-288, October.
    14. Stéphane Maraut & Catalina Martínez, 2014. "Identifying author–inventors from Spain: methods and a first insight into results," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(1), pages 445-476, October.
    15. Bruno Cassiman & Patrick Glenisson & Bart Looy, 2007. "Measuring industry-science links through inventor-author relations: A profiling methodology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 70(2), pages 379-391, February.
    16. K. C. Garg, 2002. "Scientometrics of laser research in India and China," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 55(1), pages 71-85, September.
    17. Meyer, Martin, 2000. "Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 409-434, March.
    18. Jiancheng Guan & Nan Ma, 2004. "A comparative study of research performance in computer science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 61(3), pages 339-359, November.
    19. Martin Meyer, 2002. "Tracing knowledge flows in innovation systems," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 54(2), pages 193-212, June.
    20. Anthony F J van Raan & Jos J Winnink, 2019. "The occurrence of ‘Sleeping Beauty’ publications in medical research: Their scientific impact and technological relevance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-34, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:49:y:2000:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1010529405152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.