IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v48y2000i2d10.1023_a1005644705175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge Production and Knowledge Flows in the Swedish Biotechnology Innovation System

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Sandström

    (NUTEK)

  • Ingrid Pettersson

    (NUTEK)

  • Anna Nilsson

    (Karolinska Institutet)

Abstract

As a basis for policy decisions, governments are increasingly using analysis of systems of innovation. Fundamental to the systems of innovation approach is the recognition that innovation processes essentially are interactive activities. The present paper illustrates the use and limitations of bibliometries in analysing the knowledge production and knowledge flows in a section of an innovation system focusing on life science subject fields relevant to innovation processes in biotechnology. Bibliometrics can in this context be used to identify the actors in a research intensive innovation system, the scientific profiles of actors as well as identifying networks and collaboration patterns.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Sandström & Ingrid Pettersson & Anna Nilsson, 2000. "Knowledge Production and Knowledge Flows in the Swedish Biotechnology Innovation System," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 48(2), pages 179-201, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:48:y:2000:i:2:d:10.1023_a:1005644705175
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1005644705175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1005644705175
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1005644705175?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katherine W. McCain, 1991. "Mapping economics through the journal literature: An experiment in journal cocitation analysis," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 42(4), pages 290-296, May.
    2. Francis Narin & Dominic Olivastro & Kimberly A. Stevens, 1994. "Bibliometrics/Theory, Practice and Problems," Evaluation Review, , vol. 18(1), pages 65-76, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. McKelvey, Maureen & Alm, Hakan & Riccaboni, Massimo, 2003. "Does co-location matter for formal knowledge collaboration in the Swedish biotechnology-pharmaceutical sector?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 483-501, March.
    2. Sungur, Onur & Keskin, Hidayet, 2012. "Bölgesel İnovasyon Sistemleri: Başarı Koşulları ve Politika Çıkarımları [Regional Innovation Systems: Success Factors and Policy Implications]," MPRA Paper 51835, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 05 Nov 2012.
    3. Sung-Soo Seol & Jung-Min Park, 2008. "Knowledge sources of innovation studies in Korea: A citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 75(1), pages 3-20, April.
    4. Benedita Marta Gomes Costa & Edilson da Silva Pedro & Gorete Ribeiro Macedo, 2013. "Scientific collaboration in biotechnology: the case of the northeast region in Brazil," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(2), pages 571-592, May.
    5. Bryn Lander, 2013. "Sectoral collaboration in biomedical research and development," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(1), pages 343-357, January.
    6. Anders Waxell, 2008. "Guilty by Association: A Cross-industrial Approach to Sourcing Complementary Knowledge in the Uppsala Biotechnology Cluster," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(11), pages 1605-1624, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seyedghorban, Zahra & Matanda, Margaret Jekanyika & LaPlaca, Peter, 2016. "Advancing theory and knowledge in the business-to-business branding literature," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2664-2677.
    2. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    3. Smith, K. & Marinova, D., 2005. "Use of bibliometric modelling for policy making," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 177-187.
    4. Cathelijn J. F. Waaijer & Cornelis A. Bochove & Nees Jan Eck, 2011. "On the map: Nature and Science editorials," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(1), pages 99-112, January.
    5. van Eck, N.J.P. & Waltman, L., 2009. "How to Normalize Co-Occurrence Data? An Analysis of Some Well-Known Similarity Measures," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-001-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    6. Raymundo das Neves Machado & Benjamín Vargas-Quesada & Jacqueline Leta, 2016. "Intellectual structure in stem cell research: exploring Brazilian scientific articles from 2001 to 2010," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(2), pages 525-537, February.
    7. Florentin Gloetzl & Ernest Aigner, 2015. "Pluralism in the Market of Science? A citation network analysis of economic research at universities in Vienna," Ecological Economics Papers ieep5, Institute of Ecological Economics.
    8. Clemente Rodríguez-Sabiote & Álvaro Manuel Úbeda-Sánchez & Oswaldo Lorenzo-Quiles & José Álvarez-Rodríguez, 2023. "Knowledge structures of scientific production on COVID-19 in the sphere of education: the case of publications indexed in the Web of Science during 2020," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 4285-4305, October.
    9. Рубинштейн Александр Яковлевич, "undated". "Ранжирование Российских Экономических Журналов: Научный Метод Или «Игра В Цыфирь»? [Ran Ranking of Russian Economic Journals: The Scientific Method or “Numbers Game”?]," Working papers a:pru175:ye:2016:1, Institute of Economics.
    10. William B. Gartner & Per Davidsson & Shaker A. Zahra, 2006. "Are you Talking to Me? The Nature of Community in Entrepreneurship Scholarship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 30(3), pages 321-331, May.
    11. Xianwen Wang & Xi Zhang & Shenmeng Xu, 2011. "Patent co-citation networks of Fortune 500 companies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 88(3), pages 761-770, September.
    12. Chen, Xiaoyan & Liu, Yisheng, 2020. "Visualization analysis of high-speed railway research based on CiteSpace," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1-17.
    13. Persson, Olle, 2010. "Identifying research themes with weighted direct citation links," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 415-422.
    14. Locke, Joanne & Perera, Hector, 2001. "The intellectual structure of international accounting in the early 1990s," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 223-249, May.
    15. Chaoqun Ni & Cassidy R. Sugimoto & Blaise Cronin, 2013. "Visualizing and comparing four facets of scholarly communication: producers, artifacts, concepts, and gatekeepers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(3), pages 1161-1173, March.
    16. Wang, Qiang & Li, Rongrong & He, Gang, 2018. "Research status of nuclear power: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 90-96.
    17. Paúl Carrión-Mero & Néstor Montalván-Burbano & Fernando Morante-Carballo & Adolfo Quesada-Román & Boris Apolo-Masache, 2021. "Worldwide Research Trends in Landslide Science," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-24, September.
    18. Dzikowski, Piotr, 2018. "A bibliometric analysis of born global firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 281-294.
    19. Azam, Ali & Ahmed, Ammar & Kamran, Muhammad Sajid & Hai, Li & Zhang, Zutao & Ali, Asif, 2021. "Knowledge structuring for enhancing mechanical energy harvesting (MEH): An in-depth review from 2000 to 2020 using CiteSpace," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    20. Setareh Boshrouei Shargh & Mostafa Zandieh & Ashkan Ayough & Farbod Farhadi, 2024. "Scheduling in services: a review and bibliometric analysis," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 754-783, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:48:y:2000:i:2:d:10.1023_a:1005644705175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.