IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v46y1999i3d10.1007_bf02459618.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using online databases to form subject collections for informetric analyses

Author

Listed:
  • Concepción S. Wilson

    (The University of New South Wales)

Abstract

The online databases of the Dialog System retrieve only 26% of documents in an exhaustively compiled collection on the subject of Bradford's Law of Scattering, with some documents being retrieved from many databases. However, when the Exhaustive Collection is more stringently defined to include only those documents more about the subject, the retrieval rate of Dialog improves to 61%, while its most productive database, LISA, alone retrieves 37%. Both of these ‘samples’ give good estimates of the size-invariant properties of the Exhaustive Collection which are typically studied in Bradford and Growth Analyses—vindicating this use of online searching. However, without additional information, online searches are of little use in determining size-related properties of subject literature collections. Whether the analysis reported here—which relies on identical interpretations of a ‘subject’—has secure foundations is briefly considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Concepción S. Wilson, 1999. "Using online databases to form subject collections for informetric analyses," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 46(3), pages 647-667, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:46:y:1999:i:3:d:10.1007_bf02459618
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02459618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF02459618
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02459618?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Bookstein, 1990. "Informetric distributions, part II: Resilience to ambiguity," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 41(5), pages 376-386, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michel Zitt & Suzy Ramanana-Rahary & Elise Bassecoulard, 2003. "Correcting glasses help fair comparisons in international science landscape: Country indicators as a function of ISI database delineation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 56(2), pages 259-282, February.
    2. David L. Alderson, 2008. "OR FORUM---Catching the “Network Science” Bug: Insight and Opportunity for the Operations Researcher," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(5), pages 1047-1065, October.
    3. Rafael Bailón-Moreno & Encarnación Jurado-Alameda & Rosario Ruiz-Baños & Jean Pierre Courtial & Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras, 2007. "The pulsing structure of science: Ortega y Gasset, Saint Matthew, fractality and transfractality," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 71(1), pages 3-24, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:46:y:1999:i:3:d:10.1007_bf02459618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.