IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v129y2024i6d10.1007_s11192-024-05015-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling perception and resilience factors to data sharing in clinical and basic research: an observational study

Author

Listed:
  • Federica Cugnata

    (University Center for Statistics in the Biomedical Sciences, CUSSB
    Vita-Salute San Raffaele University)

  • Chiara Brombin

    (University Center for Statistics in the Biomedical Sciences, CUSSB
    Vita-Salute San Raffaele University)

  • Chiara Maria Poli

    (Vita-Salute San Raffaele University)

  • Roberto Buccione

    (Vita-Salute San Raffaele University)

  • Clelia Serio

    (University Center for Statistics in the Biomedical Sciences, CUSSB
    Vita-Salute San Raffaele University)

Abstract

Data sharing is a major tenet in the global challenge to improve the reproducibility of scientific findings. Current researcher attitudes toward data sharing and Open Science in general are still far from optimal. The practice of data sharing and how it should be managed remain unclear and inconsistent, with many researchers keen to receive from, but not give back to the community. The lack of a data sharing culture, systemic resistance, misconceptions on data ownership and the unjustified fear of being “scooped”, all concur to create an enormous barrier to the promotion of scientific research based on increased information quality, transparency and openness, and replicability of results. These factors are also compounded by the erroneous perception that the sharing of data compromises competitiveness. Here, we present a rigorous observational study based on 198 researchers in the biomedical areas to evaluate factors affecting perception and natural attitude to data sharing in the biomedical sciences.

Suggested Citation

  • Federica Cugnata & Chiara Brombin & Chiara Maria Poli & Roberto Buccione & Clelia Serio, 2024. "Modelling perception and resilience factors to data sharing in clinical and basic research: an observational study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(6), pages 3169-3192, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s11192-024-05015-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-05015-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-024-05015-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-024-05015-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thijs Devriendt & Pascal Borry & Mahsa Shabani, 2021. "Factors that influence data sharing through data sharing platforms: A qualitative study on the views and experiences of cohort holders and platform developers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Max Kozlov, 2022. "NIH issues a seismic mandate: share data publicly," Nature, Nature, vol. 602(7898), pages 558-559, February.
    3. Kim, Youngseek & Adler, Melissa, 2015. "Social scientists’ data sharing behaviors: Investigating the roles of individual motivations, institutional pressures, and data repositories," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 408-418.
    4. Christine L. Borgman, 2012. "The conundrum of sharing research data," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(6), pages 1059-1078, June.
    5. Christine L. Borgman, 2012. "The conundrum of sharing research data," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(6), pages 1059-1078, June.
    6. Marko Sarstedt & Christian M. Ringle & Joseph F. Hair, 2022. "Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling," Springer Books, in: Christian Homburg & Martin Klarmann & Arnd Vomberg (ed.), Handbook of Market Research, pages 587-632, Springer.
    7. Rut Lucas-Dominguez & Adolfo Alonso-Arroyo & Antonio Vidal-Infer & Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent, 2021. "The sharing of research data facing the COVID-19 pandemic," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 4975-4990, June.
    8. Thijs Devriendt & Mahsa Shabani & Karim Lekadir & Pascal Borry, 2022. "Data sharing platforms: instruments to inform and shape science policy on data sharing?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3007-3019, June.
    9. Josip Strcic & Antonia Civljak & Terezija Glozinic & Rafael Leite Pacheco & Tonci Brkovic & Livia Puljak, 2022. "Open data and data sharing in articles about COVID-19 published in preprint servers medRxiv and bioRxiv," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(5), pages 2791-2802, May.
    10. Youngseek Kim & Jeffrey M. Stanton, 2016. "Institutional and individual factors affecting scientists' data-sharing behaviors: A multilevel analysis," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(4), pages 776-799, April.
    11. Harper, Lindsey M. & Kim, Youngseek, 2018. "Attitudinal, normative, and resource factors affecting psychologists’ intentions to adopt an open data badge: An empirical analysis," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 23-32.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liwei Zhang & Liang Ma, 2023. "Is open science a double-edged sword?: data sharing and the changing citation pattern of Chinese economics articles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(5), pages 2803-2818, May.
    2. Keiko Kurata & Mamiko Matsubayashi & Shinji Mine, 2017. "Identifying the Complex Position of Research Data and Data Sharing Among Researchers in Natural Science," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, July.
    3. Youngseek Kim & Ayoung Yoon, 2017. "Scientists' data reuse behaviors: A multilevel analysis," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(12), pages 2709-2719, December.
    4. Vikas Jaiman & Leonard Pernice & Visara Urovi, 2022. "User incentives for blockchain-based data sharing platforms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-22, April.
    5. Benedikt Fecher & Sascha Friesike & Marcel Hebing, 2014. "What Drives Academic Data Sharing?," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 655, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    6. Mike Thelwall, 2020. "Data in Brief: Can a mega-journal for data be useful?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(1), pages 697-709, July.
    7. Carol Tenopir & Elizabeth D Dalton & Suzie Allard & Mike Frame & Ivanka Pjesivac & Ben Birch & Danielle Pollock & Kristina Dorsett, 2015. "Changes in Data Sharing and Data Reuse Practices and Perceptions among Scientists Worldwide," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    8. Harper, Lindsey M. & Kim, Youngseek, 2018. "Attitudinal, normative, and resource factors affecting psychologists’ intentions to adopt an open data badge: An empirical analysis," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 23-32.
    9. Andrea K. Thomer, 2022. "Integrative data reuse at scientifically significant sites: Case studies at Yellowstone National Park and the La Brea Tar Pits," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(8), pages 1155-1170, August.
    10. Koenraad De Smedt & Dimitris Koureas & Peter Wittenburg, 2020. "FAIR Digital Objects for Science: From Data Pieces to Actionable Knowledge Units," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, April.
    11. Plantin, Jean-Christophe, 2021. "The data archive as factory: alienation and resistance of data processors," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 109692, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Keren Weinshall & Lee Epstein, 2020. "Developing High‐Quality Data Infrastructure for Legal Analytics: Introducing the Israeli Supreme Court Database," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 416-434, June.
    13. Jenny Bossaller & Anthony J. Million, 2023. "The research data life cycle, legacy data, and dilemmas in research data management," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(6), pages 701-706, June.
    14. Guillaume Cabanac & Thomas Preuss, 2013. "Capitalizing on order effects in the bids of peer-reviewed conferences to secure reviews by expert referees," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(2), pages 405-415, February.
    15. Liwei Zhang & Liang Ma, 2021. "Does open data boost journal impact: evidence from Chinese economics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3393-3419, April.
    16. Shibayama, Sotaro & Lawson, Cornelia, 2021. "The use of rewards in the sharing of research resources," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(7).
    17. Koutroumpis, Pantelis & Leiponen, Aija & Thomas, Llewellyn D W, 2017. "The (Unfulfilled) Potential of Data Marketplaces," ETLA Working Papers 53, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    18. Gary A. Hoover & Christian Hopp, 2017. "What Crisis? Taking Stock of Management Researchers' Experiences with and Views of Scholarly Misconduct," CESifo Working Paper Series 6611, CESifo.
    19. Ryan P Womack, 2015. "Research Data in Core Journals in Biology, Chemistry, Mathematics, and Physics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Lindung Parningotan Manik & Zaenal Akbar & Aris Yaman & Ariani Indrawati, 2022. "Indonesian Scientists’ Behavior Relative to Research Data Governance in Preventing WMD-Applicable Technology Transfer," Publications, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-29, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s11192-024-05015-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.