IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v127y2022i10d10.1007_s11192-022-04498-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is academic writing less passivized? Corpus-based evidence from research article abstracts in applied linguistics over the past three decades (1990–2019)

Author

Listed:
  • Zhijun Li

    (Huaqiao University)

Abstract

The passive voice is an essential construction for packaging information. Previous studies observed a trend that academic writing in the late half of the twentieth century witnesses a noticeable decline in the use of the passive voice. Unfortunately, indications of such trend in current academic writing are suggestive and diachronic investigation of passivization in the part-genre of research article abstracts receives little attention. To further attest the trend regarding passivization, this study tracks the evolution of passive uses as well as its relation with active uses initiated by personal pronouns in research article abstracts in applied linguistics. To this end, qualitative and quantitative analysis were conducted on a self-built corpus of 2707 abstracts published in four authoritative applied linguistics journals between 1990 and 2019. The abstracts were grouped into single- and co-authored ones using a self-compiled Visual Basic for Application Excel program and the data were statistically analyzed using SPSS Statistics 17.0. It is found that the occurrence of the passive voice displays an overall declining trend and a significantly negative correlation with the incidence of personal pronoun active uses over the three decades, particularly in co-authored abstracts. Surprisingly, a synchronous dwindle is also detected in the occurrence of personal pronoun active uses in co-authored abstracts, particularly in the latest decade. These findings suggest a shift towards an increasingly informational, efficient and reader-friendly style in abstract writing and give implications to academic writing and English for Academic Purposes instruction.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhijun Li, 2022. "Is academic writing less passivized? Corpus-based evidence from research article abstracts in applied linguistics over the past three decades (1990–2019)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(10), pages 5773-5792, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:10:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04498-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04498-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-022-04498-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-022-04498-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melissa A. Wheeler & Ekaterina Vylomova & Melanie J. McGrath & Nick Haslam, 2021. "More confident, less formal: stylistic changes in academic psychology writing from 1970 to 2016," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(12), pages 9603-9612, December.
    2. Congjun Mu, 2021. "A multidimensional contrastive analysis of linguistic features between international and local biology journal English research articles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(9), pages 7901-7916, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mingxin Yao & Ying Wei & Huiyu Wang, 2023. "Promoting research by reducing uncertainty in academic writing: a large-scale diachronic case study on hedging in Science research articles across 25 years," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(8), pages 4541-4558, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:10:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04498-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.