IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v103y2015i3d10.1007_s11192-015-1582-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A bibliometric assessment of ASEAN collaboration in plant biotechnology

Author

Listed:
  • Jane G. Payumo

    (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)
    Washington State University)

  • Taurean C. Sutton

    (Washington State University)

Abstract

This study draws on publication and citation data related to plant biotechnology from a 10-year (2004–2013) period to assess the research performance, impact, and collaboration of member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Plant biotechnology is one of the main areas of cooperation between ASEAN member states and among the research areas promoted to achieve regional food security and sustainable development. In general, findings indicate increased scientific output, influence, and overall collaboration of ASEAN countries in plant biotechnology over time. Research performance and collaboration (domestic, regional, and international) of the region in plant biotechnology are linked to the status of the economic development of each member country. Thailand produced the most publications of the ASEAN member states while Singapore had the highest influence as indicated by its citation activity in plant biotechnology among the ASEAN countries. Domestic and international collaborations on plant biotechnology are numerous. Regional collaboration or partnership among ASEAN countries was, however, was found to be very limited, which is a concern for the region’s goal of economic integration and science and technology cooperation. More studies using bibliometric data analysis need to be conducted to understand plant biotechnology cooperation and knowledge flows between ASEAN countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane G. Payumo & Taurean C. Sutton, 2015. "A bibliometric assessment of ASEAN collaboration in plant biotechnology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(3), pages 1043-1059, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:103:y:2015:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-015-1582-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1582-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-015-1582-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-015-1582-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cohen, Joel & Komen, John & Zepeda, Jose Falck, 2004. "National agricultural biotechnology research capacity in developing countries," ESA Working Papers 23790, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
    2. Joel Cohen & John Komen & José Falck Zepeda, 2004. "National Agricultural Biotechnology Research Capacity in Developing Countries," Working Papers 04-14, Agricultural and Development Economics Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO - ESA).
    3. Saeed-Ul Hassan & Peter Haddawy & Pratikshya Kuinkel & Alexander Degelsegger & Cosima Blasy, 2012. "A bibliometric study of research activity in ASEAN related to the EU in FP7 priority areas," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(3), pages 1035-1051, June.
    4. Joel Cohen, 2001. "Harnessing Biotechnology for the Poor: Challenges ahead for capacity, safety and public investment," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 239-263.
    5. Szu-chia Lo, 2007. "Patent analysis of genetic engineering research in Japan, Korea and Taiwan," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 70(1), pages 183-200, January.
    6. Sameer Kumar & Vala Ali Rohani & Kuru Ratnavelu, 2014. "International research collaborations of ASEAN Nations in economics, 1979–2010," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(1), pages 847-867, October.
    7. Robert Dalpé, 2002. "Bibliometric analysis of biotechnology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 55(2), pages 189-213, August.
    8. John Rigby, 2009. "Comparing the scientific quality achieved by funding instruments for single grant holders and for collaborative networks within a research system: Some observations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 78(1), pages 145-164, January.
    9. Wolfgang Glänzel, 2001. "National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 51(1), pages 69-115, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yury Dranev & Maxim Kotsemir & Boris Syomin, 2018. "Diversity of research publications: relation to agricultural productivity and possible implications for STI policy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(3), pages 1565-1587, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alarcon, Enrique & Artunduaga, Rodrigo, 2005. "Latin America and the Caribbean: The New Agro-biotechnologies, Challenges, Trends, and Institutional Considerations," Comuniica Magazine, Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture, vol. 2005(04-06 Apr), pages 1-10, June.
    2. Seife Ayele & David Wield, 2005. "Science and technology capacity building and partnership in African agriculture: perspectives on Mali and Egypt," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(5), pages 631-646.
    3. Jane G. Payumo & Howard D. Grimes & Keith J. Jones, 2012. "Licensing Agricultural Intellectual Property: How Should Public R&D Institutions In Developing Countries Respond?," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(04), pages 1-24.
    4. Abramo, Giovanni & D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea & Di Costa, Flavia, 2021. "The scholarly impact of private sector research: A multivariate analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    5. Sameer Kumar & Kuru Ratnavelu, 2016. "Perceptions of Scholars in the Field of Economics on Co-Authorship Associations: Evidence from an International Survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Maxim Kotsemir & Tatiana Kuznetsova & Elena Nasybulina & Anna Pikalova, 2015. "Identifying Directions for Russia’s Science and Technology Cooperation," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 9(4 (eng)), pages 54-72.
    7. Abramo, Giovanni & D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea & Grilli, Leonardo, 2021. "The effects of citation-based research evaluation schemes on self-citation behavior," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(4).
    8. Balázs Győrffy & Andrea Magda Nagy & Péter Herman & Ádám Török, 2018. "Factors influencing the scientific performance of Momentum grant holders: an evaluation of the first 117 research groups," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(1), pages 409-426, October.
    9. Shyh-Jen Wang, 2007. "Factors to evaluate a patent in addition to citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 71(3), pages 509-522, June.
    10. Ming-Chao Huang & Shih-Chieh Fang & Shao-Chi Chang, 2011. "Tracking R&D behavior: bibliometric analysis of drug patents in the Orange Book," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 88(3), pages 805-818, September.
    11. Aleixandre-Benavent, Rafael & Aleixandre-Tudó, José Luis & Castelló-Cogollos, Lourdes & Aleixandre, José Luis, 2018. "Trends in global research in deforestation. A bibliometric analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 293-302.
    12. Aashish Mehta & Patrick Herron & Yasuyuki Motoyama & Richard Appelbaum & Timothy Lenoir, 2012. "Globalization and de-globalization in nanotechnology research: the role of China," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(2), pages 439-458, November.
    13. Scellato, Giuseppe & Franzoni, Chiara & Stephan, Paula, 2015. "Migrant scientists and international networks," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 108-120.
    14. Ole Ellegaard & Johan A. Wallin, 2015. "The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 1809-1831, December.
    15. Maria Karaulova & Abdullah Gök & Oliver Shackleton & Philip Shapira, 2016. "Science system path-dependencies and their influences: nanotechnology research in Russia," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(2), pages 645-670, May.
    16. Kristofer Rolf Söderström, 2023. "The structure and dynamics of instrument collaboration networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(6), pages 3581-3600, June.
    17. Mickael Benaim & Jean-Alain Héraud & Valérie Mérindol, 2016. "Scientific connectivity of European regions: towards a typology of cooperative schemes," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 155-176.
    18. Jun Peng Yuan & Wei Ping Yue & Cheng Su & Zheng Wu & Zheng Ma & Yun Tao Pan & Nan Ma & Zhi Yu Hu & Fei Shi & Zheng Lu Yu & Yi Shan Wu, 2010. "Patent activity on water pollution and treatment in China—a scientometric perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 83(3), pages 639-651, June.
    19. Primož Južnič & Stojan Pečlin & Matjaž Žaucer & Tilen Mandelj & Miro Pušnik & Franci Demšar, 2010. "Scientometric indicators: peer-review, bibliometric methods and conflict of interests," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(2), pages 429-441, November.
    20. Houcemeddine Turki & Mohamed Ali Hadj Taieb & Mohamed Ben Aouicha & Ajith Abraham, 2020. "Nature or Science: what Google Trends says," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1367-1385, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:103:y:2015:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-015-1582-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.