IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v101y2014i3d10.1007_s11192-014-1295-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The structure and evolution of scientific collaboration in Serbian mathematical journals

Author

Listed:
  • Miloš Savić

    (University of Novi Sad)

  • Mirjana Ivanović

    (University of Novi Sad)

  • Miloš Radovanović

    (University of Novi Sad)

  • Zoran Ognjanović

    (Mathematical Institute of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts)

  • Aleksandar Pejović

    (Mathematical Institute of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts)

  • Tatjana Jakšić Krüger

    (Mathematical Institute of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts)

Abstract

Digital preservation of scientific papers enables their wider accessibility, but also provides a valuable source of information that can be used in a longitudinal scientometric study. The Electronic Library of the Mathematical Institute of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts (eLib) digitizes the most prominent mathematical journals printed in Serbia. In this paper, we study a co-authorship network which represents collaborations among authors who published their papers in the eLib journals in an 80 year period (from 1932 to 2011). Such study enables us to identify patterns and long-term trends in scientific collaborations that are characteristic for a community which mainly consists of Serbian (Yugoslav) mathematicians. Analysis of connected components of the network reveals a topological diversity in the network structure: the network contains a large number of components whose sizes obey a power-law, the majority of components are isolated authors or small trivial components, but there is also a small number of relatively large, non-trivial components of connected authors. Our evolutionary analysis shows that the evolution of the network can be divided into six periods that are characterized by different intensity and type of collaborative behavior among eLib authors. Analysis of author metrics shows that betweenness centrality is a better indicator of author productivity and long-term presence in the eLib journals than degree centrality. Moreover, the strength of correlation between productivity metrics and betweenness centrality increases as the network evolves suggesting that even more stronger correlation can be expected in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Miloš Savić & Mirjana Ivanović & Miloš Radovanović & Zoran Ognjanović & Aleksandar Pejović & Tatjana Jakšić Krüger, 2014. "The structure and evolution of scientific collaboration in Serbian mathematical journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(3), pages 1805-1830, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:101:y:2014:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1295-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1295-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-014-1295-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-014-1295-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henry Voos, 1974. "Lotka and information science," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 25(4), pages 270-272, July.
    2. E. Garfield & I. H. Sher, 1963. "New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing," American Documentation, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(3), pages 195-201, July.
    3. Haiyan Hou & Hildrun Kretschmer & Zeyuan Liu, 2008. "The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 75(2), pages 189-202, May.
    4. Perc, Matjaž, 2010. "Growth and structure of Slovenia’s scientific collaboration network," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 475-482.
    5. Bettencourt, Luís M.A. & Kaiser, David I. & Kaur, Jasleen, 2009. "Scientific discovery and topological transitions in collaboration networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 210-221.
    6. Jasna Dravec Braun, 2012. "Effects of war on scientific production: mathematics in Croatia from 1968 to 2008," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(3), pages 931-936, December.
    7. Barabási, A.L & Jeong, H & Néda, Z & Ravasz, E & Schubert, A & Vicsek, T, 2002. "Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 590-614.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jie Zheng & Jianya Gong & Rui Li & Kai Hu & Huayi Wu & Siluo Yang, 2017. "Community evolution analysis based on co-author network: a case study of academic communities of the journal of “Annals of the Association of American Geographers”," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 845-865, November.
    2. Zoran Ognjanović & Bojan Marinković & Marija Šegan-Radonjić & Dejan Masliković, 2019. "Cultural Heritage Digitization in Serbia: Standards, Policies, and Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Gregorio González-Alcaide, 2021. "Bibliometric studies outside the information science and library science field: uncontainable or uncontrollable?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 6837-6870, August.
    4. Rodica Ioana Lung & Noémi Gaskó & Mihai Alexandru Suciu, 2018. "A hypergraph model for representing scientific output," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(3), pages 1361-1379, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng Liu & Haoxiang Xia, 2015. "Structure and evolution of co-authorship network in an interdisciplinary research field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(1), pages 101-134, April.
    2. Lara-Cabrera, R. & Cotta, C. & Fernández-Leiva, A.J., 2014. "An analysis of the structure and evolution of the scientific collaboration network of computer intelligence in games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 395(C), pages 523-536.
    3. Tsouchnika, Maria & Smolyak, Alex & Argyrakis, Panos & Havlin, Shlomo, 2022. "Patent collaborations: From segregation to globalization," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    4. Marian-Gabriel Hâncean & Matjaž Perc & Jürgen Lerner, 2021. "The coauthorship networks of the most productive European researchers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 201-224, January.
    5. Yunwei Chen & Katy Börner & Shu Fang, 2013. "Evolving collaboration networks in Scientometrics in 1978–2010: a micro–macro analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(3), pages 1051-1070, June.
    6. Erjia Yan & Ying Ding & Qinghua Zhu, 2010. "Mapping library and information science in China: a coauthorship network analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 83(1), pages 115-131, April.
    7. Sergi Lozano & Xosé-Pedro Rodríguez & Alex Arenas, 2014. "Atapuerca: evolution of scientific collaboration in an emergent large-scale research infrastructure," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 1505-1520, February.
    8. Türker, İlker & Çavuşoğlu, Abdullah, 2016. "Detailing the co-authorship networks in degree coupling, edge weight and academic age perspective," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 386-392.
    9. Miloš Savić & Mirjana Ivanović & Bojana Dimić Surla, 2017. "Analysis of intra-institutional research collaboration: a case of a Serbian faculty of sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(1), pages 195-216, January.
    10. Kim, Jinseok & Diesner, Jana, 2015. "The effect of data pre-processing on understanding the evolution of collaboration networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 226-236.
    11. Jiancheng Guan & Lanxin Pang, 2018. "Bidirectional relationship between network position and knowledge creation in Scientometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(1), pages 201-222, April.
    12. Krzysztof Klincewicz, 2016. "The emergent dynamics of a technological research topic: the case of graphene," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(1), pages 319-345, January.
    13. Muaz Niazi & Amir Hussain, 2011. "Agent-based computing from multi-agent systems to agent-based models: a visual survey," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 89(2), pages 479-499, November.
    14. Jinseok Kim & Liang Tao & Seok-Hyoung Lee & Jana Diesner, 2016. "Evolution and structure of scientific co-publishing network in Korea between 1948–2011," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(1), pages 27-41, April.
    15. Roberto Lalli & Riaz Howey & Dirk Wintergrün, 2020. "The dynamics of collaboration networks and the history of general relativity, 1925–1970," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(2), pages 1129-1170, February.
    16. Sameer Kumar & Jariah Mohd. Jan, 2014. "Research collaboration networks of two OIC nations: comparative study between Turkey and Malaysia in the field of ‘Energy Fuels’, 2009–2011," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(1), pages 387-414, January.
    17. Cimenler, Oguz & Reeves, Kingsley A. & Skvoretz, John, 2014. "A regression analysis of researchers’ social network metrics on their citation performance in a college of engineering," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 667-682.
    18. Letina, Srebrenka, 2016. "Network and actor attribute effects on the performance of researchers in two fields of social science in a small peripheral community," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 571-595.
    19. Çavuşoğlu, Abdullah & Türker, İlker, 2013. "Scientific collaboration network of Turkey," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 9-18.
    20. Xiaoling Sun & Hongfei Lin & Kan Xu & Kun Ding, 2015. "How we collaborate: characterizing, modeling and predicting scientific collaborations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(1), pages 43-60, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:101:y:2014:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1295-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.