IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/schmbr/v17y2016i1d10.1007_s41464-016-0002-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valuation: The State of the Art

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Penman

    (Columbia University
    Segesta Advisors AG)

Abstract

There is a pervasive skepticism about formal valuation models, so much so that practitioners often discard them, preferring rough-cut methods such as pricing on the basis of comparables or simple P/E ratios. This paper provides a critique of standard valuation models, identifying what is being captured (and what is not being captured) in these models. The paper then strives to develop an agenda towards more robust valuation. It stresses three points. First, any valuation must be in accord with the well-established theory of finance. However, second, the valuation must also be practical. Both are important wedges in driving a solution. Third, valuation is a matter of accounting; a valuation model is only as good as the accounting that it involves. The last point is the basis for a critique of IFRS accounting.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Penman, 2016. "Valuation: The State of the Art," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 17(1), pages 3-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:schmbr:v:17:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s41464-016-0002-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s41464-016-0002-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41464-016-0002-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41464-016-0002-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jerald E. Pinto & Thomas R. Robinson & John D. Stowe, 2019. "Equity valuation: A survey of professional practice," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(2), pages 219-233, April.
    2. Mark Rubinstein, 1976. "The Valuation of Uncertain Income Streams and the Pricing of Options," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 7(2), pages 407-425, Autumn.
    3. Lorenzo Neri, 2012. "Book Review / Accounting for Value," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2012(1), pages 139-142.
    4. Merton H. Miller & Franco Modigliani, 1961. "Dividend Policy, Growth, and the Valuation of Shares," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 34, pages 411-411.
    5. Stephen Penman, 2016. "Valuation: Accounting for Risk and the Expected Return," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 52(1), pages 106-130, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ul Haque, Syed Mashhood, 2006. "Evaluating Open-End Mutual Funds Style and Performance in Respect of Investors," MPRA Paper 116392, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Mar 2022.
    2. Mario Situm, 2021. "Determination of expected cost of equity with the CAPM: Theoretical extension using the law of error propagation," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(1), pages 77-84, January.
    3. Stephen Penman, 2016. "Conservatism as a Defining Principle for Accounting," The Japanese Accounting Review, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University, vol. 6, pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephen Penman, 2016. "Valuation: Accounting for Risk and the Expected Return," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 52(1), pages 106-130, March.
    2. Lu Zhang, 2017. "The Investment CAPM," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 23(4), pages 545-603, September.
    3. James A. Ohlson, 1990. "A Synthesis of security valuation theory and the role of dividends, cash flows, and earnings," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(2), pages 648-676, March.
    4. Christian Bach, 2011. "Conservatism in Corporate Valuation," CREATES Research Papers 2011-32, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    5. Pengguo Wang, 2018. "Future Realized Return, Firm‐specific Risk and the Implied Expected Return," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 54(1), pages 105-132, March.
    6. Stephen H. Penman & Theodore Sougiannis, 1998. "A Comparison of Dividend, Cash Flow, and Earnings Approaches to Equity Valuation," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 343-383, September.
    7. Roelof Salomons, 2008. "A Theoretical And Practical Perspective On The Equity Risk Premium," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 299-329, April.
    8. Georgievski, Alex & Masih, A. Mansur M., 2004. "An analysis of option pricing under systematic consumption risk using GARCH," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 151-171, June.
    9. Matthew R. Lyle, 2016. "Valuation: Accounting for Risk and the Expected Return. Discussion of Penman," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 52(1), pages 131-139, March.
    10. Thorsten Hens & Sabine Elmiger, 2019. "Economic Foundations for Finance," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, Springer, number 978-3-030-05427-4, October.
    11. Christian Bach & Peter O. Christensen, 2016. "Consumption-based equity valuation," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 1149-1202, December.
    12. Penman, Stephen & Zhu, Julie, 2022. "An accounting-based asset pricing model and a fundamental factor," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2).
    13. Atif Ellahie, 2021. "Earnings beta," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 81-122, March.
    14. Mark Kamstra, 2001. "Rational exuberance: The fundamentals of pricing firms, from blue chip to “dot com”," FRB Atlanta Working Paper 2001-21, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
    15. Miguel Cantillo Simon, 2019. "Asset Pricing with Heterogeneous Agents and Non-Tradeable Assets," Working Papers 201907, Universidad de Costa Rica, revised Dec 2019.
    16. Hamidi Sahneh, Mehdi, 2017. "News, Noise, and Tests of Present Value Models," MPRA Paper 82715, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4142 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Jayant R. Kale & Thomas H. Noe, 1990. "Dividends, Uncertainty, And Underwriting Costs Under Asymmetric Information," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 13(4), pages 265-277, December.
    19. Demetris Christodoulou & Colin Clubb & Stuart Mcleay, 2016. "A Structural Accounting Framework for Estimating the Expected Rate of Return on Equity," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 52(1), pages 176-210, March.
    20. Hansen, Lars Peter, 2013. "Uncertainty Outside and Inside Economic Models," Nobel Prize in Economics documents 2013-7, Nobel Prize Committee.
    21. Fidrmuc, Jana P. & Jacob, Marcus, 2010. "Culture, agency costs, and dividends," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 321-339, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:schmbr:v:17:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s41464-016-0002-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.