IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sankha/v85y2023i2d10.1007_s13171-023-00308-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Permutation Tests Using Arbitrary Permutation Distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Aaditya Ramdas

    (Carnegie Mellon University)

  • Rina Foygel Barber

    (University of Chicago)

  • Emmanuel J. Candès

    (Stanford University)

  • Ryan J. Tibshirani

    (University of California Berkeley)

Abstract

Permutation tests date back nearly a century to Fisher’s randomized experiments, and remain an immensely popular statistical tool, used for testing hypotheses of independence between variables and other common inferential questions. Much of the existing literature has emphasized that, for the permutation p-value to be valid, one must first pick a subgroup G of permutations (which could equal the full group) and then recalculate the test statistic on permuted data using either an exhaustive enumeration of G, or a sample from G drawn uniformly at random. In this work, we demonstrate that the focus on subgroups and uniform sampling are both unnecessary for validity—in fact, a simple random modification of the permutation p-value remains valid even when using an arbitrary distribution (not necessarily uniform) over any subset of permutations (not necessarily a subgroup). We provide a unified theoretical treatment of such generalized permutation tests, recovering all known results from the literature as special cases. Thus, this work expands the flexibility of the permutation test toolkit available to the practitioner.

Suggested Citation

  • Aaditya Ramdas & Rina Foygel Barber & Emmanuel J. Candès & Ryan J. Tibshirani, 2023. "Permutation Tests Using Arbitrary Permutation Distributions," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 85(2), pages 1156-1177, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sankha:v:85:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s13171-023-00308-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s13171-023-00308-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13171-023-00308-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13171-023-00308-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jesse Hemerik & Jelle J. Goeman, 2021. "Another Look at the Lady Tasting Tea and Differences Between Permutation Tests and Randomisation Tests," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(2), pages 367-381, August.
    2. Jesse Hemerik & Jelle Goeman, 2018. "Exact testing with random permutations," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 27(4), pages 811-825, December.
    3. Matthew T. Harrison, 2012. "Conservative hypothesis tests and confidence intervals using importance sampling," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 99(1), pages 57-69.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. N W Koning & J Hemerik, 2024. "More efficient exact group invariance testing: using a representative subgroup," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 111(2), pages 441-458.
    2. David M. Ritzwoller & Joseph P. Romano & Azeem M. Shaikh, 2024. "Randomization Inference: Theory and Applications," Papers 2406.09521, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angel G. Angelov & Magnus Ekström, 2023. "Tests of stochastic dominance with repeated measurements data," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 107(3), pages 443-467, September.
    2. N W Koning & J Hemerik, 2024. "More efficient exact group invariance testing: using a representative subgroup," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 111(2), pages 441-458.
    3. Stefano Bonnini & Getnet Melak Assegie & Kamila Trzcinska, 2024. "Review about the Permutation Approach in Hypothesis Testing," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-29, August.
    4. Guogen Shan & Xinlin Lu & Yahui Zhang & Samuel S. Wu, 2024. "Confidence intervals for overall response rate difference in the sequential parallel comparison design," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(8), pages 5333-5349, October.
    5. Djogbenou, Antoine & Sufana, Razvan, 2024. "Tests for group-specific heterogeneity in high-dimensional factor models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    6. Young, Alwyn, 2024. "Asymptotically robust permutation-based randomization confidence intervals for parametric OLS regression," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120933, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Jesse Hemerik & Jelle J. Goeman, 2021. "Another Look at the Lady Tasting Tea and Differences Between Permutation Tests and Randomisation Tests," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(2), pages 367-381, August.
    8. Jesse Hemerik & Jelle J. Goeman & Livio Finos, 2020. "Robust testing in generalized linear models by sign flipping score contributions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 82(3), pages 841-864, July.
    9. Young, Alwyn, 2024. "Asymptotically robust permutation-based randomization confidence intervals for parametric OLS regression," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    10. David M. Ritzwoller & Joseph P. Romano & Azeem M. Shaikh, 2024. "Randomization Inference: Theory and Applications," Papers 2406.09521, arXiv.org.
    11. Hediger, Simon & Michel, Loris & Näf, Jeffrey, 2022. "On the use of random forest for two-sample testing," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sankha:v:85:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s13171-023-00308-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.