IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rrorus/v7y2017i1d10.1134_s2079970517010075.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Creating the conditions for innovation development of resource-based regions

Author

Listed:
  • A. E. Sevastyanova

    (Russian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

The possibilities of innovation development, as well as the creation and promotion of an innovative model of a region’s subsoil development, have several dimensions. Regional factors and conditions have the most importance among them. Practical interest in the regional level of administration consists in analysis of controllable factors. The paper discusses the theoretical base and experience of innovation development of the most successful resource-based countries. The analysis shows that the key role in innovation development is played by the state; national innovation systems are shaped with consideration of the resource-related specifics of the economy. Government regulation aims to wholly encourage entrepreneurship and private initiative; therefore, a considerable share of investment in scientific research comes from industry. The experience of innovation developed Russian resource regions (Tomsk oblast, the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, and the Republic of Tatarstan) proves that the development of innovation sphere improved the regions’ image and conditions to attract investment and highly trained professionals. The innovation component can provide an impulse not only in the development of traditional production segments, but also in addressing socioeconomic problems of areas. A trend has emerged of taking into account regions’ resource profiles in their innovation development strategies, but there is still a lack of relations between the innovation sector and the region’s resource enterprises. The share of the resource sector in the structure of the economy is not a decisive factor (neither an obstacle) of successful innovation activity, since there are other significant factors and conditions. The regional governance level plays an important role in establishing and developing innovation processes: along with technological innovations, managerial, organizational and marketing innovations have become important; institutional transformations, political competencies, and the role of regional authorities come to the foreground; a good return can be achieved through active participation in federal initiatives to support innovation development.

Suggested Citation

  • A. E. Sevastyanova, 2017. "Creating the conditions for innovation development of resource-based regions," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-9, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:7:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1134_s2079970517010075
    DOI: 10.1134/S2079970517010075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S2079970517010075
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1134/S2079970517010075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Autant-Bernard, Corinne & Fadairo, Muriel & Massard, Nadine, 2013. "Knowledge diffusion and innovation policies within the European regions: Challenges based on recent empirical evidence," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 196-210.
    2. Philippe Aghion, 2005. "Growth and Institutions," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 32(1), pages 3-18, March.
    3. Acemoglu, Daron & Johnson, Simon & Robinson, James A., 2005. "Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 6, pages 385-472, Elsevier.
    4. Nadezhda Nikolaevna Mikheeva, 2014. "Comparative Analysis of Innovative Systems in the Russian Regions," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 4, pages 61-81.
    5. S. R. Khalimova, 2016. "Assessment of Russian regions by level of innovative development," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 115-124, April.
    6. Todtling, Franz & Trippl, Michaela, 2005. "One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 1203-1219, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Galina Ivanovna POPODKO & Tatyana Sergeevna ZIMNYAKOVA & Svetlana Leonidovna ULINA & Ekaterina Vladimirovna SUMINA, 2019. "Modeling The Innovative Performance Of Resource Areas: Analysis Of 22 Russian Regions," Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 19(2), pages 57-68.
    2. Anastasiya Ye. Sevastyanova & Victor A. Yatsenko, 2020. "Barriers to sustainable development of municipalities with resource specialisation of the economy," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 21(4), pages 174-191, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eicher, Theo S. & Schreiber, Till, 2010. "Structural policies and growth: Time series evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 169-179, January.
    2. Henrekson, Magnus & Johansson, Dan, 2010. "Firm Growth, Institutions and Structural Transformation," Ratio Working Papers 150, The Ratio Institute.
    3. Domenico Giannone & Michele Lenza & Lucrezia Reichlin, 2011. "Market Freedom and the Global Recession," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 59(1), pages 111-135, April.
    4. Canavire-Bacarreza, Gustavo & Martínez-Vázquez, Jorge & Vulovic, Violeta, 2013. "Taxation and Economic Growth in Latin America," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 4583, Inter-American Development Bank.
    5. Tiago Neves Sequeira & Marcelo Santos, 2019. "Technology in 1500 and genetic diversity," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1145-1165, April.
    6. Litina, Anastasia, 2012. "Unfavorable land endowment, cooperation, and reversal of fortune," MPRA Paper 39702, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Kenneth Gillingham & William D. Nordhaus & David Anthoff & Geoffrey Blanford & Valentina Bosetti & Peter Christensen & Haewon McJeon & John Reilly & Paul Sztorc, 2015. "Modeling Uncertainty in Climate Change: A Multi-Model Comparison," NBER Working Papers 21637, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Delgado, Michael S. & McCloud, Nadine & Kumbhakar, Subal C., 2014. "A generalized empirical model of corruption, foreign direct investment, and growth," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 298-316.
    9. Mayshar, Joram & Moav, Omer & Neeman, Zvika, 2011. "Transparency, Appropriability and the Early State," CEPR Discussion Papers 8548, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. Marattin, Luigi & Marzo, Massimiliano & Zagaglia, Paolo, 2013. "Distortionary tax instruments and implementable monetary policy," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 219-243.
    11. Andrianova, Svetlana & Demetriades, Panicos & Xu, Chenggang, 2011. "Political Economy Origins of Financial Markets in Europe and Asia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 686-699, May.
    12. Falkinger, Josef & Grossmann, Volker, 2013. "Oligarchic land ownership, entrepreneurship, and economic development," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 206-215.
    13. Gani, Azmat & Scrimgeour, Frank, 2014. "Modeling governance and water pollution using the institutional ecological economic framework," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 363-372.
    14. James B. Ang & Jakob B. Madsen, 2012. "Risk capital, private credit, and innovative production," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(4), pages 1608-1639, November.
    15. De Geest, Lawrence R. & Kingsley, David C., 2021. "Norm enforcement with incomplete information," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 403-430.
    16. Baumöhl, Eduard & Iwasaki, Ichiro & Kočenda, Evžen, 2019. "Institutions and determinants of firm survival in European emerging markets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 431-453.
    17. Harashima, Taiji, 2017. "Should a Government Fiscally Intervene in a Recession and, If So, How?," MPRA Paper 78053, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Jean-pierre Allegret & Sana Azzabi, 2013. "Financial development, threshold effects and convergence in developing and emerging countries," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 33(3), pages 1899-1921.
    19. Sebastian Galiani & Daniel Heymann & Carlos Dabus & Fernando Tohme, 2005. "Land-Rich Economies, Education and Economic Development," Working Papers 85, Universidad de San Andres, Departamento de Economia, revised Dec 2005.
    20. Andreas P. Kyriacou & Leonel Muinelo-Gallo & Oriol Roca-Sagalés, 2015. "Fiscal decentralization and regional disparities: The importance of good governance," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(1), pages 89-107, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:7:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1134_s2079970517010075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.