IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rrorus/v14y2024i2d10.1134_s2079970524600185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Public Sector Performance in Regions of the Russian Federation

Author

Listed:
  • O. V. Tarasova

    (Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences)

  • S. V. Sedipkova

    (Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

In connection with the growing spatial unevenness of socioeconomic development in Russia, empirical assessments of the activities of the public sector at the regional level are of scientific interest. Russia is a federal state in which all subjects have equal status; therefore, it is assumed that the state should strive to perform its functions equally throughout the country. A review of research into the activities of the public sector showed a lack of studies on its comprehensive assessment using Russian data at a regional level, which determined the aim of this study. The proposed assessment methodology is based on construction of a composite index of 74 indicators of socioeconomic development of regions for 2011–2020, in the formation of which the public sector plays a significant role. The PSP (Public Sector Performance) assessment methodology was modified by the authors by increasing the number of indicators considered and changing the standardization method, taking into account the characteristics of the data set. A procedure was also applied for assigning various weights to indicators through expert assessment of the state’s influence on them. A composite PSP index by region and subindices for eight blocks were calculated: Transport Infrastructure; Healthcare; Education, Science and Innovation; Sports and Culture; Social support; Safety; Ecology; and Economic Development. The Gini coefficient indicates low differentiation of PSP in Russian regions, although the leaders of the final ranking are Moscow and St. Petersburg by a significant margin. The gap behind the leaders is more pronounced in the first three blocks. Authorities can use the results to identify weaknesses of regions, and sectoral spatial gaps; to develop directions for correcting government programs; and to determine the pool of interregional interactions in order to transfer the best administrative cases, projects, and practices from leading regions in the corresponding areas.

Suggested Citation

  • O. V. Tarasova & S. V. Sedipkova, 2024. "Assessing Public Sector Performance in Regions of the Russian Federation," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 296-305, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:14:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1134_s2079970524600185
    DOI: 10.1134/S2079970524600185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S2079970524600185
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1134/S2079970524600185?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barinova, Vera (Баринова, Вера) & Zemtsov, Stepan (Земцов, Степан) & Semenova, Roza (Семенова, Роза), 2017. "Some Methodological Approaches to the Ranking of Regions Based on the Results of Innovation Activities [Некоторые Методологические Подходы К Рейтингованию Регионов По Результатам Инновационной Деят," Working Papers 031720, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    2. N. Akindinova & A. Chernyavsky & D. Avdeeva, 2017. "Effectiveness of budget expenditures in Russia and OECD countries," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 2.
    3. António Afonso & Ludger Schuknecht & Vito Tanzi, 2005. "Public sector efficiency: An international comparison," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 123(3), pages 321-347, June.
    4. António Afonso & Alma Romero & Emma Monsalve, 2013. "Public sector efficiency: evidence for Latin America," Working Papers Department of Economics 2013/20, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa.
    5. Anup Kumar Yadava & Yadawananda Neog, 2022. "Public Sector Performance and Efficiency Assessment of Indian States," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 23(2), pages 493-511, April.
    6. N. Akindinova & A. Chernyavsky & D. Avdeeva., 2017. "Effectiveness of budget expenditures in Russia and OECD countries," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 2.
    7. repec:idb:brikps:80478 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. V. A. Volkonskii, 2020. "Features of Economic Development and the Role of the State in Modern Russia," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 136-144, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. World Bank, 2015. "Central America Social Expenditures and Institutional Review," World Bank Publications - Reports 22672, The World Bank Group.
    2. António Afonso & José Alves, 2023. "Are fiscal consolidation episodes helpful for public sector efficiency?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(31), pages 3547-3560, July.
    3. António Afonso & João Tovar Jalles & Ana Venâncio, 2023. "Government Spending and Tax Revenue Decentralization and Public Sector Efficiency: Do Natural Disasters matter?," Working Papers REM 2023/0271, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    4. António Afonso & Gabriela Baquero Fraga, 2024. "Government spending efficiency in Latin America," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 51(1), pages 127-160, February.
    5. António Afonso & Ludger Schuknecht, 2019. "How “Big” Should Government Be?," Working Papers REM 2019/78, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    6. António Afonso & João Tovar Jalles & Ana Venâncio, 2024. "A tale of government spending efficiency and trust in the state," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 200(1), pages 89-118, July.
    7. Hyeri Choi & Min Jae Park, 2019. "Evaluating the Efficiency of Governmental Excellence for Social Progress: Focusing on Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 111-130, January.
    8. Legenzova Renata & Gaigalienė Asta & Rudytė Dalia & Skunčikienė Solveiga & Kazlauskienė Vilma, 2023. "Assessment of public education expenditure efficiency across Lithuanian municipalities," Financial Internet Quarterly (formerly e-Finanse), Sciendo, vol. 19(4), pages 63-79, December.
    9. World Bank, 2014. "Honduras Social Expenditures and Institutional Review," World Bank Publications - Reports 21804, The World Bank Group.
    10. Kyriacou, Andreas & Muinelo-Gallo, Leonel & Roca-Sagalés, Oriol, 2015. "On the redistributive efficiency of fiscal policy," MPRA Paper 63276, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Azar Dufrechou, Paola, 2016. "The efficiency of public education spending in Latin America: A comparison to high-income countries," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 188-203.
    12. António Afonso & João Tovar Jalles & Ana Venâncio, 2021. "Taxation and Public Spending Efficiency: An International Comparison," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 63(3), pages 356-383, September.
    13. Ant—nio Afonso & João Tovar Jalles & Ana Venâncio, 2023. "Government spending efficiency, measurement and applications: A cross-country efficiency dataset," Chapters, in: António Afonso & João Tovar Jalles & Ana Venâncio (ed.), Handbook on Public Sector Efficiency, chapter 3, pages 44-71, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Juliana Arias & Alejandro Torres, 2018. "Economic efficiency of public secondary education expenditure: How different are developed and developing countries?," Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad, Universidad de los Andes,Facultad de Economía, CEDE, vol. 80(4), pages 119-154, February.
    15. Antonio Afonso & Ludger Schuknecht, 2019. "How “big†should government be?," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 85-96.
    16. repec:wbk:wboper:21805 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. World Bank, 2015. "Central America Social Expenditures and Institutional Review," World Bank Publications - Reports 22491, The World Bank Group.
    18. António Afonso & José Alves, 2022. "Does government spending efficiency improve fiscal sustainability?," Working Papers REM 2022/0226, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    19. World Bank Group, 2015. "Central America Social Expenditures and Institutional Review," World Bank Publications - Reports 23607, The World Bank Group.
    20. Simona-Gabriela Masca, 2014. "Efficiency of Public Expenditure: Review and Preliminary Results for Romania," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 4(8), pages 326-345, August.
    21. Leke Pula & Florentina Xhelili, 2022. "Government Public Spending Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis between Kosovo and EU Countries, Especially Western Balkan Countries," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 3-17.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:14:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1134_s2079970524600185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.