IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rrorus/v12y2022i3d10.1134_s2079970522700071.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entrepreneurship Policy and SME Development during Pandemic Crisis in Russia

Author

Listed:
  • S. Zemtsov

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • V. Barinova

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
    The Innovation Economy Department, The Gaidar Institute)

  • R. Semenova

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • A. Mikhailov

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

Abstract

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) suffered from government restrictions and a drop in consumer demand in 2020–2021 and therefore became one of the main targets of anti-crisis support worldwide. We aimed to identify trends and factors influencing the SMEs’ dynamics in the Russian regions during the coronacrisis, including the impact of entrepreneurship policy. We have verified with the econometric analysis that the SMEs’ number reduction was more serious in regions with a large SME sector, with a high proportion of industries potentially affected by the crisis, with stricter anti-pandemic measures. The latter factor had an impact not only on the domestic market, but also on SMEs in neighboring regions, which proves the existence of close ties between enterprises of different regions. However, there are some factors that influenced the SMEs development positively: relatively higher income level, more favourable business climate and larger consumer market. The previously undertaken efforts of the regional authorities to improve the business climate had a positive effect on the SMEs survival during the crisis. Business digitalization turned out to be an effective way to adapt (online services and sales), and state support policies could be more efficient (targeted and accessible) in digitally advanced regions. The agrarian regions due to continued demand for food got through the crisis more easily, while the border regions, focused on foreign trade relations, suffered more. In general, the business performance reduction was smaller in the regions that significantly intensified support. In a group of proactive regions (Tyumen, Belgorod, Ulyanovsk oblast, Crimea,1 etc.), where both general and specific support were increased above the national average, SMEs decrease rate was 1.6% lower. According to our calculations, during crises special attention should be paid to supporting business digitalization, improving regional business climate and increasing the accessibility of markets for SMEs (transport development, import substitution, etc.). These measures can become a significant factor in business development after the events of 2022.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Zemtsov & V. Barinova & R. Semenova & A. Mikhailov, 2022. "Entrepreneurship Policy and SME Development during Pandemic Crisis in Russia," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 321-334, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:12:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1134_s2079970522700071
    DOI: 10.1134/S2079970522700071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S2079970522700071
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1134/S2079970522700071?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simeon Djankov & Rafael La Porta & Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes & Andrei Shleifer, 2002. "The Regulation of Entry," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 117(1), pages 1-37.
    2. Robert W. Fairlie, 2020. "The Impact of Covid-19 on Small Business Owners: The First Three Months after Social-Distancing Restrictions," CESifo Working Paper Series 8581, CESifo.
    3. Olga Demidova & Elizat Kamalova, 2021. "Spatial Econometric Modeling of Economic Growth in Russian Regions: Do Institutions Matter? [Пространственно-Эконометрическое Моделирование Экономического Роста Российских Регионов: Имеют Ли Значен," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 2, pages 34-59, April.
    4. S. P. Zemtsov & V. L. Baburin, 2020. "COVID-19: Spatial Dynamics and Diffusion Factors across Russian Regions," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 273-290, July.
    5. Philip McCann & Raquel Ortega-Argilés, 2016. "Smart specialisation, entrepreneurship and SMEs: issues and challenges for a results-oriented EU regional policy," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 537-552, April.
    6. S. P. Zemtsov & A. Y. Chepurenko & V. A. Barinova & A. N. Krasnoselskih, 2020. "New entrepreneurship policy in Russia after the 2020 crisis," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 10.
    7. Satish Nambisan, 2017. "Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(6), pages 1029-1055, November.
    8. Robert Fairlie, 2020. "The impact of COVID‐19 on small business owners: Evidence from the first three months after widespread social‐distancing restrictions," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 727-740, October.
    9. Guido W. Imbens & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2009. "Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(1), pages 5-86, March.
    10. Fossen, Frank M. & Sorgner, Alina, 2021. "Digitalization of work and entry into entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 548-563.
    11. Maksim Belitski & Ana-Maria Grigore & Anca Bratu, 2021. "Political entrepreneurship: entrepreneurship ecosystem perspective," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1973-2004, December.
    12. Stavros Kalogiannidis & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2021. "Impact of Covid-19 in the European Start-ups Business and the Idea to Re-energise the Economy," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(2), pages 55-61, April.
    13. Obraztsova, O. & Chepurenko, A., 2020. "Entrepreneurial activity in Russia and its cross-regional differences," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 46(2), pages 198-210.
    14. Ondrej Dvoulety, 2021. "A First Year’s Impact of the Pandemic on the Czech Entrepreneurial Activity," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 15(4), pages 52-60.
    15. N. V. Zubarevich & S. G. Safronov, 2020. "Russian Regions in the Acute Phase of the Coronavirus Crisis: Differences from Previous Economic Crises of the 2000s," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 443-453, October.
    16. S. P. Zemtsov & Y. V. Tsareva & D. R. Salimova & V. A. Barinova, 2021. "Small and medium-sized enterprises in Russia: In search of the employment growth factors," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 12.
    17. V. A. Barinova & S. P. Zemtsov & Yu. V. Tsareva., 2018. "Entrepreneurship and institutions: Does the relationship exist at the regional level in Russia?," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 6.
    18. P. A. Lavrinenko & T. N. Mikhailova & A. A. Romashina & P. A. Chistyakov, 2019. "Agglomeration Effect as a Tool of Regional Development," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 268-274, May.
    19. Lev Freinkman & Andrei Yakovlev, 2015. "Institutional frameworks to support regulatory reform in middle-income economies: lessons from Russia's recent experience," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 354-369, September.
    20. Stepan Zemtsov & Alexander Chepurenko & Alexander Mikhailov, 2021. "Pandemic Challenges for the Technological Startups in the Russian Regions," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 15(4), pages 61-77.
    21. Olga Obraztsova & Alexander Chepurenko, 2020. "Sme Policy In The Russian Federation: Renewal After The Pandemic?," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 3, pages 71-95.
    22. Brown, David & Fay, Marianne & V. Lall, Somik & Gun Wang, Hyoung & Felkner, John, 2008. "Death of distance? Economic implications of infrastructure improvement in Russia," EIB Papers 10/2008, European Investment Bank, Economics Department.
    23. Scott Shane, 2009. "Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 141-149, August.
    24. Zemtsov Stepan & Mikhaylov Alexander, 2021. "Trends and Factors of Development of Small and Medium-sized Businesses in Russian Regions during Сorona Crisis [Тенденции И Факторы Развития Малого И Среднего Бизнеса В Регионах России В Период Кор," Russian Economic Development, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 4, pages 34-45, April.
    25. Zemtsov, S., 2020. "Institutions, entrepreneurship, and regional development in Russia," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 46(2), pages 168-180.
    26. V. A. Barinova & S. P. Zemtsov & Y. V. Tsareva, 2018. "Entrepreneurship and institutions: Does the relationship exist at the regional level in Russia?," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 6.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Polina Popova, 2024. "COVID-19, Corporate Non-performing Loans, and Corporate Lending Dynamics: Evidence from Russian Regions," HSE Working papers WP BRP 93/FE/2024, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    2. V. A. Barinova & S. P. Zemtsov, 2023. "From Direct SMEs’ Support to Entrepreneurship Policy in Russia: Why Do Regional Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Matter?," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 440-457, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizaveta V. Martyanova & Andrey V. Polbin, 2023. "General equilibrium model with the entrepreneurial sector for the Russian economy," Russian Journal of Economics, ARPHA Platform, vol. 9(2), pages 109-133, July.
    2. Gala, Kaushik & Schwab, Andreas & Mueller, Brandon A., 2024. "Star entrepreneurs on digital platforms: Heavy-tailed performance distributions and their generative mechanisms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 39(1).
    3. Santos, Susana C. & Liguori, Eric W. & Garvey, Erin, 2023. "How digitalization reinvented entrepreneurial resilience during COVID-19," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    4. V. A. Barinova & S. P. Zemtsov, 2023. "From Direct SMEs’ Support to Entrepreneurship Policy in Russia: Why Do Regional Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Matter?," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 440-457, September.
    5. Zemtsov, S., 2022. "Technological entrepreneurship as a development factor of Russia," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 53(1), pages 212-223.
    6. Iva Gregurec & Martina Tomičić Furjan & Katarina Tomičić-Pupek, 2021. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Sustainable Business Models in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.
    7. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M. Ángeles & Romero-Castro, Noelia María & Pérez-Pico, Ada María, 2020. "Innovation, entrepreneurship and knowledge in the business scientific field: Mapping the research front," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 475-485.
    8. Ioannis Giotopoulos & Alexander S. Kritikos & Aggelos Tsakanikas, 2023. "A lasting crisis affects R&D decisions of smaller firms: the Greek experience," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1161-1175, August.
    9. John C. Haltiwanger, 2022. "Entrepreneurship during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from the Business Formation Statistics," Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(1), pages 9-42.
    10. Robert Fairlie & Frank M. Fossen, 2022. "The 2021 Paycheck Protection Program Reboot: Loan Disbursement to Employer and Nonemployer Businesses in Minority Communities," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 112, pages 287-291, May.
    11. Vincent Miozzi & Benjamin Powell, 2023. "The pre-pandemic political economy determinants of lockdown severity," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 197(1), pages 167-183, October.
    12. Hong Joo Lee, 2019. "What Factors Are Necessary for Sustaining Entrepreneurship?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, May.
    13. Abel Brodeur & David Gray & Anik Islam & Suraiya Bhuiyan, 2021. "A literature review of the economics of COVID‐19," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 1007-1044, September.
    14. Santos, Cezar & Kozeniauskas, Nicholas & Moreira, Pedro, 2020. "Covid-19 and Firms: Productivity and Government Policies," CEPR Discussion Papers 15156, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    15. Michal Hrivnák & Peter Moritz & Marcela Chreneková, 2021. "What Kept the Boat Afloat? Sustainability of Employment in Knowledge-Intensive Sectors Due to Government Measures during COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.
    16. Ben Youssef, Adel & Boubaker, Sabri & Dedaj, But & Carabregu-Vokshi, Mjellma, 2021. "Digitalization of the economy and entrepreneurship intention," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    17. Lafortune, Jeanne & Pugatch, Todd & Tessada, José & Ubfal, Diego, 2022. "Can interactive online training make high school students more entrepreneurial? Experimental evidence from Rwanda," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1041, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    18. Jacob A. Jordaan, 2023. "Firm‐level characteristics and the impact of COVID‐19: Examining the effects of foreign ownership and international trade," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(7), pages 1967-1998, July.
    19. Jose Ribamar Siqueira Junior & Enrique Horst & German Molina & Laura H. Gunn & Felipe Reinoso-Carvalho & Burcu Sezen & Nathalie Peña-García, 2023. "Branding in the eye of the storm: the impact of brand ethical behavior on brand commitment during the COVID-19 crisis in a South American country," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 95-115, March.
    20. Robert Wapshott & Oliver Mallett, 2018. "Small and medium-sized enterprise policy: Designed to fail?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(4), pages 750-772, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:12:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1134_s2079970522700071. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.