IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rrorus/v11y2021i4d10.1134_s2079970521040225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nature Tourism in National Parks: the Visitors’ Perspective (a Case Study of the Zyuratkul NP, Russia)

Author

Listed:
  • T. N. Tretiakova

    (South Ural State University, Institute of Sports, Tourism and Service)

  • Yu. A. Syromiatnikova

    (South Ural State University, Institute of Sports, Tourism and Service)

  • J. Brankov

    (South Ural State University, Institute of Sports, Tourism and Service
    Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić,” Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts)

  • M. M. Radovanović

    (South Ural State University, Institute of Sports, Tourism and Service
    Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić,” Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts)

Abstract

— The paper presents a possible new concept of the management of tourism in protected areas in Russia, which includes researching the visitors’ perceptions and their specific habits, as opposed to traditional “self-regulating” tourism. The survey method was applied to a sample of 319 respondents to establish the visitors’ attitude toward the impact of tourism and the effect that impact has on their stay in the Zyuratkul National Park in Russia. The results confirmed a strong positive perception regarding the overall experience in the protected area. Specific habits of traveling, which testify about consistent models of behavior, were also indicated. No significant negative environmental impact of tourism was registered; however, the respondents were found sensitive to specific social influences (interaction with the local culture, quality of accommodation, the level of service provided, etc.). The most significant predictors of visitors’ attitudes are gender and education, as well as certain patterns of behavior when traveling (means of transport, frequency of visits, and daily consumption). The results of the research provide useful information for creating future tourism policies, with the special emphasis on the analysis of visitors’ opinions, as functional management guideline.

Suggested Citation

  • T. N. Tretiakova & Yu. A. Syromiatnikova & J. Brankov & M. M. Radovanović, 2021. "Nature Tourism in National Parks: the Visitors’ Perspective (a Case Study of the Zyuratkul NP, Russia)," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 667-679, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:11:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1134_s2079970521040225
    DOI: 10.1134/S2079970521040225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S2079970521040225
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1134/S2079970521040225?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Onwujekwe, Obinna & Hanson, Kara & Fox-Rushby, Julia, 2005. "Do divergences between stated and actual willingness to pay signify the existence of bias in contingent valuation surveys?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 525-536, February.
    2. Ana Milanović Pešić & Jovana Brankov & Dragana Milijašević Joksimović, 2020. "Water quality assessment and populations’ perceptions in the National park Djerdap (Serbia): key factors affecting the environment," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2365-2383, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aziz, Sonia & Pakhtigian, Emily L. & Akanda, Ali S. & Jutla, Antarpreet & Huq, Anwar & Alam, Munirul & Ashan, Gias U. & Colwell, Rita R., 2021. "Does improved risk information increase the value of cholera prevention? An analysis of stated vaccine demand in slum areas of urban Bangladesh," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    2. Luke Harman & Catherine Goodman & Andrew Dorward, 2018. "The impact of a mosquito net voucher subsidy programme on incremental ownership: The case of the Tanzania National Voucher Scheme," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 480-492, March.
    3. Muhammed Nazmul Islam & Atonu Rabbani & Malabika Sarker, 2019. "Health shock and preference instability: assessing health-state dependency of willingness-to-pay for corrective eyeglasses," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Saif Said & Shadab Ali Khan, 2021. "Remote sensing-based water quality index estimation using data-driven approaches: a case study of the Kali River in Uttar Pradesh, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 18252-18277, December.
    5. Awad Mataria & Stéphane Luchini & Yousef Daoud & Jean‐Paul Moatti, 2007. "Demand assessment and price‐elasticity estimation of quality‐improved primary health care in palestine: a contribution from the contingent valuation method," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(10), pages 1051-1068, October.
    6. Kanya, Lucy & Sanghera, Sabina & Lewin, Alex & Fox-Rushby, Julia, 2019. "The criterion validity of willingness to pay methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 238-261.
    7. Awad Mataria & Stéphane Luchini & Yousef Daoud & Jean-Paul Moatti, 2007. "Demand assessment and price-elasticity estimation of quality-improved primary health care in palestine: a contribution from the contingent valuation method," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(10), pages 1051-1068.
    8. M. Trapero‐Bertran & H. Mistry & J. Shen & J. Fox‐Rushby, 2013. "A Systematic Review And Meta‐Analysis Of Willingness‐To‐Pay Values: The Case Of Malaria Control Interventions," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(4), pages 428-450, April.
    9. Kangethe, Anne & Franic, Duska M. & Corso, Phaedra S., 2016. "Comparing the validity of the payment card and structured haggling willingness to pay methods: The case of a diabetes prevention program in rural Kenya," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 86-96.
    10. Kanya, Lucy & Saghera, Sabina & Lewin, Alex & Fox-Rushby, Julia, 2019. "The criterion validity of willingness to pay methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 100741, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Ana Milanović Pešić & Tamara Jojić Glavonjić & Stefan Denda & Dejana Jakovljević, 2023. "Sustainable Tourism Development and Ramsar Sites in Serbia: Exploring Residents’ Attitudes and Water Quality Assessment in the Vlasina Protected Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-27, October.
    12. Paul McNamee & Laura Ternent & Adjima Gbangou & David Newlands, 2010. "A game of two halves? Incentive incompatibility, starting point bias and the bidding game contingent valuation method," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(1), pages 75-87, January.
    13. Uzochukwu, Benjamin & Uguru, Nkolika & Ezeoke, Uche & Onwujekwe, Obinna & Sibeudu, Tochi, 2011. "Voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) for HIV/AIDS: A study of the knowledge, awareness and willingness to pay for VCT among students in tertiary institutions in Enugu State Nigeria," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(3), pages 277-284, March.
    14. Jovana Brankov & Jasna Micić & Jelena Ćalić & Jelena Kovačević-Majkić & Ranko Milanović & Tamás Telbisz, 2022. "Stakeholders’ Attitudes toward Protected Areas: The Case of Tara National Park (Serbia)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, March.
    15. David Whynes & Emma Frew & Jane Wolstenholme, 2005. "Willingness-to-Pay and Demand Curves: A Comparison of Results Obtained Using Different Elicitation Formats," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 369-386, December.
    16. Marko D. Petrović & Dobrila Lukić & Milan M. Radovanović & Ivana Blešić & Tamara Gajić & Dunja Demirović Bajrami & Julia A. Syromiatnikova & Đurđa Miljković & Sanja Kovačić & Marija Kostić, 2023. "How Can Tufa Deposits Contribute to the Geotourism Offer? The Outcomes from the First UNESCO Global Geopark in Serbia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    17. Mandy Ryan & Emmanouil Mentzakis & Suthi Jareinpituk & John Cairns, 2017. "External Validity of Contingent Valuation: Comparing Hypothetical and Actual Payments," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(11), pages 1467-1473, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:11:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1134_s2079970521040225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.