IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rrorus/v11y2021i1d10.1134_s2079970521010123.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical Analysis of Imperfections in Innovative Systems of Resource and Nonresource Regions of Russia

Author

Listed:
  • S. A. Samusenko

    (Siberian Federal University)

  • G. I. Popodko

    (Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences)

  • T. S. Zimnyakova

    (Siberian Federal University)

Abstract

— To assess the innovative activity of companies depending on their reaction to imperfections in regional innovation systems requires a study that takes into account regional specialization. This is due to the low level of study of the problem in the domestic and foreign literature. The use of foreign experience in analyzing systemic imperfections in innovative systems makes it possible to classify imperfections, identify the reasons for their occurrence, and determine the choice of model of the innovation process for actors of innovative activity, but at the same time it is insufficient for managing imperfections. Foreign researchers have found that differences in the structure and interactions within regional innovation systems associated with the trajectory of their technological development hinder the development of a unified approach to national innovation policy, since the regional level is ignored. Therefore, it is important to focus on the regional aspect of the study: Russian regions with different specialization of the economy are in the same macroeconomic and institutional conditions, but they form the regional product and show innovative activity in different ways. The aim of this study is to test hypotheses about differences in assessing imperfections in innovation systems by business representatives of two groups of regions: the regions with specialization on raw materials (resource regions) and the regions with other specialization of economy (nonresource regions). Also, we intend to analyze the impact of this assessment on the innovative activity of the entrepreneurial community. The study was empirical in nature and based on a telephone survey of representatives of 500 commercial organizations, of which 53.8% operated in resource regions and 46.2% in nonresource regions. Insignificant discrepancies were revealed in the assessment of imperfections of regional innovation systems by business representatives of resource and nonresource regions. This indicates that the problem of the low level of development of market institutions in the country is common to both. Significant differences are attributed to the patterns of the innovative interactions of actors and lie in the area of social capital. The hypothesis about the influence of assessment of the degree of systemic imperfections on the choice of business in favor of innovative activity has not been confirmed: when making a decision to introduce innovations, entrepreneurs are guided primarily by the interests of the company and do not take into account imperfections of innovation systems. The research results can be used in developing national and regional innovation policy, including for regions with different specializations.

Suggested Citation

  • S. A. Samusenko & G. I. Popodko & T. S. Zimnyakova, 2021. "Empirical Analysis of Imperfections in Innovative Systems of Resource and Nonresource Regions of Russia," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 101-112, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:11:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1134_s2079970521010123
    DOI: 10.1134/S2079970521010123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S2079970521010123
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1134/S2079970521010123?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sotiris Zygiaris, 2009. "Regional Innovation System Failures And Highlights," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 3(2), pages 54-76, DECEMBER.
    2. Pavitt, Keith, 1984. "Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 343-373, December.
    3. Bjorn Johnson & Birgitte Gregersen, 1995. "Systems of innovation and economic integration," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 1-18.
    4. Bergek, Anna & Jacobsson, Staffan & Carlsson, Bo & Lindmark, Sven & Rickne, Annika, 2008. "Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 407-429, April.
    5. Bleda, Mercedes & del Río, Pablo, 2013. "The market failure and the systemic failure rationales in technological innovation systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 1039-1052.
    6. Charles Edquist, 2011. "Design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis: identification of systemic problems (or failures)," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 20(6), pages 1725-1753, December.
    7. Meyer-Krahmer, Frieder & Schmoch, Ulrich, 1998. "Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(8), pages 835-851, December.
    8. Edquist, Charles, 2011. "Innovation Policy Design: Identification of Systemic Problems," Papers in Innovation Studies 2011/6, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    9. Malerba, Franco & Orsenigo, Luigi, 1997. "Technological Regimes and Sectoral Patterns of Innovative Activities," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 6(1), pages 83-117.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. E. Lebedeva, 2023. "A Study of the Development of Innovative Activities in Oil and Gas Regions Using a Cross-Methodological Approach," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 231-242, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Havas, Attila, 2016. "Recent economic theorising on innovation: Lessons for analysing social innovation," MPRA Paper 77385, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Havas, Attila, 2014. "Types of knowledge and diversity of business-academia collaborations: Implications for measurement and policy," MPRA Paper 65908, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 23 May 2015.
    3. Malhotra, Abhishek & Schmidt, Tobias S. & Huenteler, Joern, 2019. "The role of inter-sectoral learning in knowledge development and diffusion: Case studies on three clean energy technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 464-487.
    4. Attila Havas, 2016. "Social and Business Innovations: Are Common Measurement Approaches Possible?," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 10(2 (eng)), pages 58-80.
    5. Attila Havas, 2014. "Trapped by the high-tech myth: the need and chances for a new policy rationale," Chapters, in: Hartmut Hirsch-Kreinsen & Isabel Schwinge (ed.), Knowledge-Intensive Entrepreneurship in Low-Tech Industries, chapter 9, pages 193-217, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Attila Havas, 2015. "The persistent high-tech myth in the EC policy circles - Implications for the EU10 countries," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1517, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    7. Havas, Attila, 2014. "Mit mér(j)ünk?. Az innováció értelmezései - szakpolitikai következmények [The theory and measurement of innovation and its mutual effect on policy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 1022-1059.
    8. Attila Havas, 2015. "Various approaches to measuring business innovation: their relevance for capturing social innovation," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1554, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    9. Chen, Shih-Hsin & Lin, Wei-Ting, 2017. "The dynamic role of universities in developing an emerging sector: a case study of the biotechnology sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 283-297.
    10. Fagerberg, Jan, 2018. "Mobilizing innovation for sustainability transitions: A comment on transformative innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1568-1576.
    11. Jan Fagerberg, 2018. "Mission (im)possible? The role of innovation (and innovation policy) in supporting structural change & sustainability transitions," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20180216, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
    12. Joanna Stryjek, 2021. "Counteracting the COVID-19 Crisis with Innovation Policy Tools: A Case Study of the EU’s Supranational Innovation Policy," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 450-468.
    13. Matthijs Janssen & Carolina Castaldi & Alexander Alexiev, 2014. "Dynamic capabilities for service innovation: conceptualization and measurement," Working Papers 14-07, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies, revised Mar 2014.
    14. Edquist, Charles, 2014. "Efficiency of Research and Innovation Systems for Economic Growth and Employment," Papers in Innovation Studies 2014/8, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    15. Jakob Edler & Jan Fagerberg, 2017. "Innovation policy: what, why, and how," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(1), pages 2-23.
    16. Rakas, Marija & Hain, Daniel S., 2019. "The state of innovation system research: What happens beneath the surface?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    17. Victoria Galan-Muros & Todd Davey, 2019. "The UBC ecosystem: putting together a comprehensive framework for university-business cooperation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 1311-1346, August.
    18. Bengtsson, Lars & Edquist, Charles, 2020. "Towards a holistic user innovation policy," Papers in Innovation Studies 2020/11, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    19. Momin Mukherjee, 2017. "Innovation and System Design," Post-Print hal-01592487, HAL.
    20. Haddad, Carolina R. & Uriona Maldonado, Mauricio, 2017. "A functions approach to improve sectoral technology roadmaps," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 251-260.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:11:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1134_s2079970521010123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.