IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/roafes/v105y2024i4d10.1007_s41130-024-00220-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ex-ante evaluation of a cross-sectorial business model for risk management in new product development: the case of Haitian farming

Author

Listed:
  • Rival Valcin

    (Tokyo University of Agriculture)

  • Tomohiro Uchiyama

    (Tokyo University of Agriculture)

  • Rika Terano

    (Tokyo University of Agriculture)

  • Katsumori Hatanaka

    (Tokyo University of Agriculture)

  • Yasuo Ohe

    (Tokyo University of Agriculture)

  • Nina Shimoguchi

    (Tokyo University of Agriculture)

Abstract

With the rise of climate change, institutions are compelled to adopt new strategies to increase resilience toward natural disasters. For institutions providing insurance products to farmers, the probability of ruin becomes higher. How will agricultural institutions in regions with high occurrences of catastrophic risks survive? Since risks cannot be effectively managed exclusively in one sector, we have developed and evaluated a multisectoral business model in Haitian farming. To this end, in the summer of 2023, we interviewed 22 leaders of Haitian financial institutions. The research followed a framework outlining the different stages of new product development. This business analysis phase, which corresponds to stage four, is focused on evaluating the ex-ante business model. We used an interactive design approach for concept selection based on expert opinion. We prioritized intuitive assessment by experts to discover the most suitable implementation of the developed strategy. The study suggests that Minimum Extendable Compensation is the most suitable approach to risk management for the sectors involved, particularly regarding the principle of risk sharing and risk transfer. This new product is proposed to foster farmer resilience to natural disasters. In addition, partnership agreements promoting partial demonetization of transactions with the farmers are preferable to prevent liquidity limitation and possible moral hazards. Consequently, the derived approach can be applied to other small and medium economies, where the conventional agrarian insurance system presents itself as a massive burden for governments.

Suggested Citation

  • Rival Valcin & Tomohiro Uchiyama & Rika Terano & Katsumori Hatanaka & Yasuo Ohe & Nina Shimoguchi, 2024. "Ex-ante evaluation of a cross-sectorial business model for risk management in new product development: the case of Haitian farming," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 105(4), pages 419-441, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:roafes:v:105:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s41130-024-00220-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s41130-024-00220-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41130-024-00220-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41130-024-00220-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Insurance innovation; Technology adoption; Intuitive assessment; Minimum Extendable Compensation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E58 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Central Banks and Their Policies
    • E51 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Money Supply; Credit; Money Multipliers
    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
    • Q14 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Finance
    • Q13 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Markets and Marketing; Cooperatives; Agribusiness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:roafes:v:105:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s41130-024-00220-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.