IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/reihed/v66y2025i3d10.1007_s11162-025-09838-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder Perspectives on Rankings of Higher Education Institutions: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Melike Çağlayan

    (Jagiellonian University)

  • Ece Çağlayan

    (Middle East Technical University)

  • Cengiz Acartürk

    (Jagiellonian University)

Abstract

This study analyzes the factors influencing the stakeholder perspectives on of Higher Education Institution (HEI) rankings, reporting data collected from 1232 participants through a survey method and employing the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) model and complementary models for the analyses. Our primary focus was to identify the relationships between various predictor variables influencing the perception of HEI rankings. We analyzed how demographic variables, such as age, gender, job experience, and employment status, might moderate these relationships. The key findings show that certain model dimensions, such has Performance Expectancy, Price Value, Habit, Hedonic Motivation, Perceived Information Quality, Perceived Trust, and Awareness significantly influence participants’ behavioral intentions and actual use of the HEI rankings. Overall, this study provides a quantitative perspective to perception of HEI rankings from a stakeholders’ point of view, reflecting similarities and differences among various participants.

Suggested Citation

  • Melike Çağlayan & Ece Çağlayan & Cengiz Acartürk, 2025. "Stakeholder Perspectives on Rankings of Higher Education Institutions: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 66(3), pages 1-38, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:reihed:v:66:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11162-025-09838-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11162-025-09838-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11162-025-09838-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11162-025-09838-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:reihed:v:66:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11162-025-09838-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.