IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/reihed/v58y2017i1d10.1007_s11162-016-9417-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

College Students’ Appreciative Attitudes Toward Atheists

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas A. Bowman

    (University of Iowa)

  • Alyssa N. Rockenbach

    (North Carolina State University)

  • Matthew J. Mayhew

    (New York University)

  • Tiffani A. Riggers-Piehl

    (Baylor University)

  • Tara D. Hudson

    (University of Notre Dame)

Abstract

Atheists are often marginalized in discussions of religious and spiritual pluralism on college campuses and beyond. As with other minority worldview groups, atheists face challenges with hostile campus climates and misunderstanding of their views. The present study used a large, multi-institutional sample to explore predictors of non-atheist college students’ appreciative attitudes toward atheists. Substantial differences were found across identities; secular and spiritual worldview groups hold the most positive views, whereas Christians and Muslims have the most negative attitudes. Interactions with worldview diversity—but not general religious/spiritual engagement—consistently predict more positive attitudes, and these relationships sometimes vary based on students’ own worldviews. These results suggest that colleges and universities can create more inclusive environments for atheists, who constitute a sizable minority group on today’s college campuses.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas A. Bowman & Alyssa N. Rockenbach & Matthew J. Mayhew & Tiffani A. Riggers-Piehl & Tara D. Hudson, 2017. "College Students’ Appreciative Attitudes Toward Atheists," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 58(1), pages 98-118, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:reihed:v:58:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11162-016-9417-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11162-016-9417-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11162-016-9417-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11162-016-9417-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:reihed:v:58:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11162-016-9417-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.