IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v58y2024i5d10.1007_s11135-024-01885-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Catalysts of audit excellence: competitive advantage, intellectual capital and auditing quality

Author

Listed:
  • Saleh F. A. Khatib

    (Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
    Sohar University)

  • Hamid Ghazi H Sulimany

    (Taif University)

  • Mohammed Naif Alshareef

    (Umm-Al-Qura University)

  • Mohd Noor Azli Ali Khan

    (Universiti Teknologi Malaysia)

Abstract

This study investigates the complex interplay between intellectual capital, competitive advantage, and audit quality within the context of auditing firms operating in China. Drawing upon a sample of auditing firms, data was collected and analyzed to examine the relationships between various components of intellectual capital (including structural capital, human capital, relational capital, and spiritual capital), competitive advantage, and audit quality. The study employs structural equation modeling to test the hypothesized relationships and assess the mediating role of competitive advantage. Findings indicate a positive association between intellectual capital components and competitive advantage, with structural capital and relational capital demonstrating particularly strong impacts. Furthermore, competitive advantage serves as a significant mediator in the relationship between intellectual capital and audit quality, highlighting the critical role of strategic resource management in enhancing audit quality outcomes. By investing in the development of intellectual capital resources, such as organizational structures, human expertise, and external relationships, auditing firms can not only strengthen their competitive position but also improve the quality and effectiveness of their audit services.

Suggested Citation

  • Saleh F. A. Khatib & Hamid Ghazi H Sulimany & Mohammed Naif Alshareef & Mohd Noor Azli Ali Khan, 2024. "Catalysts of audit excellence: competitive advantage, intellectual capital and auditing quality," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(5), pages 4915-4939, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:58:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s11135-024-01885-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-024-01885-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-024-01885-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-024-01885-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-04-2019-3957 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Xiaoke Wang & Yanyan Wang & Lisheng Yu & Yuping Zhao & Zhenyu Zhang, 2015. "Engagement audit partner experience and audit quality," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 230-253, July.
    3. Pietro A. Bianchi & Nieves Carrera & Marco Trombetta, 2020. "The Effects of Auditor Social and Human Capital on Auditor Compensation: Evidence from the Italian Small Audit Firm Market," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 693-721, July.
    4. Mary Kehinde Salawu, 2017. "Factors Influencing Auditor Independence among Listed Companies in Nigeria: Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) Approach," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(8), pages 191-203, August.
    5. Kevin Koh & Li Li & Xuejiao Liu & Chunfei Wang, 2023. "The Effect of Audit Partner Diversity on Audit Quality: Evidence from China," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 59(1), pages 340-380, March.
    6. Sharad Asthana & Inder Khurana & K. K. Raman, 2019. "Fee competition among Big 4 auditors and audit quality," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 403-438, February.
    7. Helen Yee, 2020. "Institutional logics and institutional work: radical reform of the Chinese public accounting profession in the 1990s," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(5), pages 1019-1046, April.
    8. Saddam A. Hazaea & Jinyu Zhu & Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari & Nabil Ahmed M. Senan & Saleh F. A. Khatib & Saif Ullah, 2021. "Mapping of internal audit research in China: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1938351-193, January.
    9. Kwok, Francis & Sharma, Piyush & Gaur, Sanjaya Singh & Ueno, Akiko, 2019. "Interactive effects of information exchange, relationship capital and environmental uncertainty on international joint venture (IJV) performance: An emerging markets perspective," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 1-1.
    10. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Aobdia & Luminita Enache & Anup Srivastava, 2021. "Changes in Big N auditors’ client selection and retention strategies over time," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 715-754, February.
    2. Sebastian Kronenberger & Volker Laux, 2022. "Conservative Accounting, Audit Quality, and Litigation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 2349-2362, March.
    3. Ghafran, Chaudhry & O'Sullivan, Noel, 2017. "The impact of audit committee expertise on audit quality: Evidence from UK audit fees," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(6), pages 578-593.
    4. Kausar, Asad & Shroff, Nemit & White, Hal, 2016. "Real effects of the audit choice," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 157-181.
    5. Zvi Singer & Jing Zhang, 2022. "Do companies try to conceal financial misstatements through auditor shopping?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1-2), pages 140-180, January.
    6. Stefano Cascino & Ane Tamayo & Felix Vetter, 2021. "Labor Market Effects of Spatial Licensing Requirements: Evidence from CPA Mobility," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 111-161, March.
    7. Liang Tan & Santhosh Ramalingegowda & Yong Yu, 2022. "Third-Party Consequences of Changes in Managerial Fiduciary Duties: The Case of Auditors’ Going Concern Opinions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 1556-1572, February.
    8. Lawson, Bradley P. & Muriel, Leah & Sanders, Paula R., 2017. "A survey on firms' implementation of COSO's 2013 Internal Control–Integrated Framework," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 30-43.
    9. Pan, Yue & Shroff, Nemit & Zhang, Pengdong, 2023. "The dark side of audit market competition," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1).
    10. Mehdi Nekhili & Fahim Javed & Haithem Nagati, 2022. "Audit Partner Gender, Leadership and Ethics: The Case of Earnings Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(2), pages 233-260, May.
    11. John M. Barrios, 2022. "Occupational Licensing and Accountant Quality: Evidence from the 150‐Hour Rule," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 3-43, March.
    12. Chen, Anthony & Duong, Hong & Ngo, Anh, 2019. "Types of nonaudit service fees and earnings response coefficients in the post-sarbanes-oxley era," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 132-147.
    13. Cao, June & Ee, Mong Shan & Hasan, Iftekhar & Huang, He, 2024. "Asymmetric reactions of abnormal audit fees jump to credit rating changes," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(2).
    14. David B. Bryan & Terry W. Mason, 2023. "Lead independent directors and accruals quality," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3-4), pages 660-679, March.
    15. Rita Lamboglia & Daniela Mancini, 2021. "The relationship between auditors’ human capital attributes and the assessment of the control environment," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(4), pages 1211-1239, December.
    16. Camelia-Daniela Hategan, 2019. "Factors Influencing The Quality Of Financial Audit," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4(2), pages 7-15, September.
    17. Kharuddin, Khairul Ayuni Mohd & Basioudis, Ilias G & Farooque, Omar Al, 2021. "Effects of the Big 4 national and city-level industry expertise on audit quality in the United Kingdom," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    18. Salikhova, Tatiana & Ugarov, Alexander & Orlova, Svetlana, 2024. "Dividend smoothing and financial transparency," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    19. repec:mth:ijafr8:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:450-461 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Cai, Yongbin & Li, Mengzhe, 2022. "CEO-CFO tenure consistency and audit fees," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    21. Kristina Peštović & Nikola Milicevic & Nenad Djokic & Ines Djokic, 2021. "Audit Service Quality Perceived by Customers: Formative Modelling Measurement Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:58:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s11135-024-01885-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.