IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v56y2022i4d10.1007_s11135-021-01157-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Qualitative Comparative Analysis and robust sufficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Baumgartner

    (University of Bergen)

Abstract

Some methodologists take the search target of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to be causal INUS-conditions, others contend that QCA should instead be used to search for some form of sufficiency that is more substantive than mere Boolean sufficiency. While the notion of an INUS-condition has a long and uncontroversial definitional history, Adrian Dusa, in a recent paper, is the first to explicitly define a notion of substantive sufficiency, which he labels robust sufficiency. Dusa’s definition, however, is vacuous in real-life research contexts. As an alternative, the first part of this paper non-vacuously defines robust sufficiency and supplies a corresponding notion of minimality, which—I argue—captures Dusa’s conceptual intentions. In the second part, I then report and discuss the results of a series of simulation experiments benchmarking the performance of the different QCA solution types in recovering robust sufficiency and minimality.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Baumgartner, 2022. "Qualitative Comparative Analysis and robust sufficiency," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1939-1963, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:56:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-021-01157-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-021-01157-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-021-01157-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-021-01157-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eva Thomann & Martino Maggetti, 2020. "Designing Research With Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Approaches, Challenges, and Tools," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 49(2), pages 356-386, May.
    2. Ragin, Charles C., 2006. "Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 291-310, July.
    3. Michael Baumgartner & Alrik Thiem, 2020. "Often Trusted but Never (Properly) Tested: Evaluating Qualitative Comparative Analysis," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 49(2), pages 279-311, May.
    4. Schneider, Carsten Q., 2018. "Realists and Idealists in QCA," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(2), pages 246-254, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yulia A. Levites Strekalova & Diana L. Kornetti & Ruixuan Wang & Adriana Báez & Lee S. Caplan & Muhammed Y. Idris & Kimberly Lawson & Jada Holmes & Mohamed Mubasher & Priscilla Pemu & Jonathan K. Stil, 2023. "Individual and Institutional Factors Contribute to Research Capacity Building for Early-Stage Investigators from Groups Underrepresented in Biomedical Research: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(9), pages 1-11, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martyna Daria Swiatczak, 2022. "Different algorithms, different models," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1913-1937, August.
    2. Tim Haesebrouck & Eva Thomann, 2022. "Introduction: Causation, inferences, and solution types in configurational comparative methods," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1867-1888, August.
    3. James Mahoney & Laura Acosta, 2022. "A regularity theory of causality for the social sciences," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1889-1911, August.
    4. Yangjie Huang & Sihui Li & Xiyuan Xiang & Leilei Huang, 2024. "Analyzing the configuration of the National Innovation System for Innovation Capability: evidence from Global Innovation Index reports," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Marie Romuald Pouka Pouka & Viviane Ondoua Biwolé, 2024. "Does causal analysis improve the understanding of entrepreneurial support for SME performance?," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Filippopoulos, Nikolaos & Fotopoulos, Georgios, 2022. "Innovation in economically developed and lagging European regions: A configurational analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(2).
    7. Judith Glaesser, 2023. "Limited diversity and QCA solution types: assumptions and their consequences," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3485-3497, August.
    8. Majuri, Matti, 2022. "Inter-firm knowledge transfer in R&D project networks: A multiple case study," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    9. Eloy Gil-Cordero & Pablo Ledesma-Chaves & Sunghoon Yoo & Heesup Han, 2023. "Luxury tourism and purchase intention factors: a mixed approach applied to luxury goods," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Olga Rataj & Serdar Türkeli, 2024. "Success Factors for Scaling Up and Raising Investment by Circular Entrepreneurs in Emerging Markets and Developing Economies," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1021-1046, June.
    11. Eloy Gil-Cordero & Pablo Ledesma-Chaves & Jaime Ortega-Gutierrez & Heesup Han, 2023. "Organizational value and participatory leadership for sustaining the competitive advantages of hospitality and tourism companies," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Tim Haesebrouck, 2023. "Relevant, Irrelevant, or Ambiguous? Toward a New Interpretation of QCA’s Solution Types," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 52(4), pages 1737-1764, November.
    13. De Souter Luna, 2024. "Evaluating Boolean relationships in Configurational Comparative Methods," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, January.
    14. Carsten Q. Schneider, 2019. "Two-step QCA revisited: the necessity of context conditions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 1109-1126, May.
    15. Prosman, Ernst Johannes & Cagliano, Raffaella, 2022. "A contingency perspective on manufacturing configurations for the circular economy: Insights from successful start-ups," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    16. Grohs, Reinhard & Raies, Karine & Koll, Oliver & Mühlbacher, Hans, 2016. "One pie, many recipes: Alternative paths to high brand strength," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 2244-2251.
    17. Barry Cooper & Judith Glaesser, 2016. "Analysing necessity and sufficiency with Qualitative Comparative Analysis: how do results vary as case weights change?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 327-346, January.
    18. Yu-Li Lin & Hsiu-Wen Liu & Fengzeng Xu & Hao Wang, 2016. "Environmental Conditions, Entrepreneur Alertness and Social Capital on Performance," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(8), pages 1-13, August.
    19. Thomas Mellewigt & Glenn Hoetker & Martina Lütkewitte, 2018. "Avoiding High Opportunism Is Easy, Achieving Low Opportunism Is Not: A QCA Study on Curbing Opportunism in Buyer–Supplier Relationships," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1208-1208, December.
    20. Federica Nieri & Luciano Ciravegna & Ruth V. Aguilera & Elisa Giuliani, 2019. "Larger, more internationalized, better behaved? A configurational study of em erging market multinational enterprises' involvement in corporate wrongdoing," Discussion Papers 2019/255, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:56:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-021-01157-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.