IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v56y2022i3d10.1007_s11135-021-01162-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to present the analysis of qualitative data within interdisciplinary studies for readers in the life and natural sciences

Author

Listed:
  • Gerda Casimir

    (Wageningen University)

  • Hilde Tobi

    (Wageningen University)

  • Peter Andrew Tamás

    (Wageningen University)

Abstract

Research that addresses complex challenges often requires contributions from the social, life and natural sciences. The disciplines that contribute subject response data, and more specifically qualitative analyses of subject response data, to interdisciplinary studies are characterised by low consensus with respect to methods they use a diversity of terms to describe those methods and they often work from assumptions that are foreign to readers in the natural and life sciences. The first contribution this paper makes is to demonstrate that the forms of reporting that may be adequate for communicating quantitative analysis do not provide teams that include members from natural, life and social sciences with useful accounts of qualitative analysis. Our second contribution is to discuss and model how to report four methods appropriate for qualitative contributions to interdisciplinary projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerda Casimir & Hilde Tobi & Peter Andrew Tamás, 2022. "How to present the analysis of qualitative data within interdisciplinary studies for readers in the life and natural sciences," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 967-984, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:56:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11135-021-01162-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-021-01162-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-021-01162-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-021-01162-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hilde Tobi & Jarl K. Kampen, 2018. "Research design: the methodology for interdisciplinary research framework," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 1209-1225, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajeshkumar Ramraj & Ehsan Pashajavid & Sanath Alahakoon & Shantha Jayasinghe, 2023. "Quality of Service and Associated Communication Infrastructure for Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-28, October.
    2. Henry Oswald Esau & Robertson K. Tengeh, 2022. "Key success factors for scaling social enterprises in South Africa," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(4), pages 396-415, June.
    3. Declan Fahie & Gerry Dunne, 2021. "Standing by or Standing Up? —How Philosophy Can (In)form Our Understanding of Bystander Behaviours in Workplace Bullying Dynamics," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-10, March.
    4. Jacques Toit & Mark Napier & Lochner Marais & Jan Cloete & Beth Crankshaw, 2022. "A typology of designs for housing research: improving methodological coherence of paradigm, approach and design," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 3875-3891, December.
    5. Guus ten Broeke & Hilde Tobi, 2021. "Mapping validity and validation in modelling for interdisciplinary research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(5), pages 1613-1630, October.
    6. Fabio Zagonari, 2019. "(Moral) philosophy and (moral) theology can function as (behavioural) science: a methodological framework for interdisciplinary research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(6), pages 3131-3158, November.
    7. Samarth Kumar & Christoph Zöphel & Anna Martius & Rengin Cabadag & Frederik Plewnia & Nick Pruditsch & Bastian A. Sakowski & Dominik Möst, 2019. "Stronger together—A framework for measuring interdisciplinary understanding," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(6), November.
    8. Danțiș Dragoș, 2023. "The Journey of Doctoral Research Challenges and Lessons Learnt," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 1839-1847, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:56:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11135-021-01162-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.