IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v55y2021i3d10.1007_s11135-020-01028-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of COVID-19 in E-learning on higher education institution students: the group comparison between male and female

Author

Listed:
  • Arfan Shahzad

    (Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM))

  • Rohail Hassan

    (Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM))

  • Adejare Yusuff Aremu

    (Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM))

  • Arsalan Hussain

    (Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM))

  • Rab Nawaz Lodhi

    (UCP Business School, University of Central Punjab)

Abstract

In response to the emerging and ever solution to the COVID-19 outbreak. This study proposes a theoretical framework based on literature and model to determined E-learning portal success. The study compared males and females to E-learning portal usage. The study objective is to check the difference between male and female E-learning portals’ accessibility among the students’ perspective. The study included service quality, system quality, information quality, user satisfaction, system use, and E-learning portal success. The empirical data of 280 students participated from the different universities of Malaysia through google surveys analyzed using the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling. The study further divided the full model into two domains, which are female and male. In the male model, information quality and system quality have direct relationships with user satisfaction. Information quality also supported the relationship with system use. At the same time, there is a positive relationship between user satisfaction and E-learning portals. Likewise, in the female model, E-service quality and Information quality both are supported by system use and user satisfaction. Similarly, system quality has a positive relationship with user satisfaction, and user satisfaction has a positive relationship with E-learning portals. The study will be further helpful for the Malaysian universities policy-makers such as top management, ministry of higher education, Malaysian universities union in designing the policies and programs on E-learning Portal Success in the country. The findings of the study reveal that males and females have a different level of in terms of usage of towards E-learning portals in Malaysian Universities.

Suggested Citation

  • Arfan Shahzad & Rohail Hassan & Adejare Yusuff Aremu & Arsalan Hussain & Rab Nawaz Lodhi, 2021. "Effects of COVID-19 in E-learning on higher education institution students: the group comparison between male and female," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 805-826, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:55:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11135-020-01028-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-020-01028-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-020-01028-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-020-01028-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rajagopal, 2014. "The Human Factors," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Architecting Enterprise, chapter 9, pages 225-249, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Arun Rai & Sandra S. Lang & Robert B. Welker, 2002. "Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 50-69, March.
    3. William H. DeLone & Ephraim R. McLean, 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 60-95, March.
    4. DeLone, William H. & McLean, Ephraim R., 2016. "Information Systems Success Measurement," Foundations and Trends(R) in Information Systems, now publishers, vol. 2(1), pages 1-116, August.
    5. Princely Ifinedo, 2011. "An Empirical Analysis Of Factors Influencing Internet/E-Business Technologies Adoption By Smes In Canada," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(04), pages 731-766.
    6. Tanya McGill & Valerie Hobbs & Jane Klobas, 2003. "User Developed Applications and Information Systems Success: A Test of DeLone and McLean's Model," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 16(1), pages 24-45, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Michael D. Williams & Vishanth Weerakkody, 2015. "Investigating success of an e-government initiative: Validation of an integrated IS success model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 127-142, February.
    2. Peters, Twan & Işık, Öykü & Tona, Olgerta & Popovič, Aleš, 2016. "How system quality influences mobile BI use: The mediating role of engagement," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 773-783.
    3. Yan chao Shi & Un-Kon Lee, 2021. "The Impact of Restaurant Recommendation Information and Recommendation Agent in the Tourism Website on the Satisfaction, Continuous Usage, and Destination Visit Intention," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    4. Floropoulos, Jordan & Spathis, Charalambos & Halvatzis, Dimitrios & Tsipouridou, Maria, 2010. "Measuring the success of the Greek Taxation Information System," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 47-56.
    5. Sunil Meshram & Salma Ahmed, 2019. "Identification & Examination of Critical Success Factor for Projects: A Case Study of Tamil Nadu Geographical Information System (TNGIS)," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 18(2), pages 119-129, December.
    6. Jong Uk Kim & Rajiv Kishore, 2019. "Do we Fully Understand Information Systems Failure? An Exploratory Study of the Cognitive Schema of IS Professionals," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1385-1419, December.
    7. Morteza Ghobakhloo & Masood Fathi, 2019. "Modeling the Success of Application-Based Mobile Banking," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-21, November.
    8. Nurlia Dewi & Willy Abdillah & Muhartini Salim & Slamet Widodo, 2021. "The Role of Leadership in Implementation Public Information System of Local Government Institutions in Indonesia," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 11(6), pages 1-9.
    9. A. Maes & G. Poels, 2006. "Development of a user evaluations based quality model for conceptual modeling," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 06/406, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    10. Lahuddin, Harlinda & Modding, H. Basri & Semmaila, H. Baharuddin & Lamo, H. Muchtar & Jamali, Hisnol, 2018. "Effect of management support and user participation on implementation of information systems success and undergraduate programs performance," INA-Rxiv 5cbx3, Center for Open Science.
    11. Sharath Sasidharan & Radhika Santhanam & Daniel J. Brass & Vallabh Sambamurthy, 2012. "The Effects of Social Network Structure on Enterprise Systems Success: A Longitudinal Multilevel Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-1), pages 658-678, September.
    12. Lahuddin, Harlinda & Gani, Ahmad & Nujum, Syamsu & Modding, H. Basri & Jamali, Hisnol, 2018. "Effect of management support and user participation on implementation of information systems success and undergraduate programs performance," INA-Rxiv p7fm4, Center for Open Science.
    13. Roman Lukyanenko & Andrea Wiggins & Holly K. Rosser, 0. "Citizen Science: An Information Quality Research Frontier," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    14. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & David Wastell & Sven Laumer & Helle Zinner Henriksen & Michael D. Myers & Deborah Bunker & Amany Elbanna & M. N. Ravishankar & Shirish C. Srivastava, 2015. "Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 143-157, February.
    15. Stephanie Schwipper & Severine Peche & Gertrud Schmitz, 2020. "Mobile Location-Based Services’ Value-in-Use in Inner Cities: Do a Customer’s Shopping Patterns, Prior User Experience, and Sales Promotions Matter?," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 72(4), pages 511-564, October.
    16. Ugljesa Marjanovic & Milan Delić & Bojan Lalic, 2016. "Developing a model to assess the success of e-learning systems: evidence from a manufacturing company in transitional economy," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 253-272, May.
    17. Kim, Changsu & Oh, Eunhae & Shin, Namchul & Chae, Myungsin, 2009. "An empirical investigation of factors affecting ubiquitous computing use and U-business value," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 436-448.
    18. S Michel & A Michaud-Trévinal & F Cocula, 2019. "Net Impacts in Front Office IS: a First Operationalization of Delone and McLean Model in the Banking Sector," Post-Print hal-02467423, HAL.
    19. Jani Merikivi & Antti Salovaara & Matti Mäntymäki & Lilong Zhang, 2018. "On the way to understanding binge watching behavior: the over-estimated role of involvement," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(1), pages 111-122, February.
    20. Shalini Garg & Shipra Sharma, 2020. "User Satisfaction and Continuance Intention for Using E-Training: A Structural Equation Model," Vision, , vol. 24(4), pages 441-451, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:55:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11135-020-01028-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.