IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v49y2015i5p1897-1918.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of a first-time interviewer on cognitive interview quality

Author

Listed:
  • Anja Mohorko
  • Valentina Hlebec

Abstract

Cognitive interviews are a useful tool for questionnaire pretesting. However, detailed information on the proper way of performing them is scarce–researchers use this method without agreement on applicable techniques or specific rules on their realization. Additionally, users of cognitive interviewing techniques only seldom explain the pretesting results in their research, leaving it to readers to trust their outcomes. Follow-up observations on the success of the interviews and the overall experience are rarely, if ever, presented. We were interested in the learnability of the techniques when performed by non-experienced, newly instructed interviewers; moreover, we wanted to understand the most common problems they had experienced. During a five-year period, 120 methodology students performed 612 cognitive interviews and analyzed 17 different survey questionnaires. The precise documentation of their assignment served as a detailed database of qualitative and quantitative information on their experiences. The results present the first-time interviewers’ ability to accurately perform and analyze a cognitive interview. We show the most common mistakes and issues in all stages of the interviewing process, the influence of different interviewers’ and respondents’ characteristics, and the effect of the technique on the interview’s success. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Anja Mohorko & Valentina Hlebec, 2015. "Effect of a first-time interviewer on cognitive interview quality," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 1897-1918, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:49:y:2015:i:5:p:1897-1918
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-014-0081-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-014-0081-0
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-014-0081-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jobe, J.B. & Mingay, D.J., 1989. "Cognitive research improves questionnaires," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 79(8), pages 1053-1055.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annette S. Crisanti & Jennifer Earheart & Megan Deissinger & Kathryn Lowerre & Julie G. Salvador, 2022. "Implementation Challenges and Recommendations for Employing Peer Support Workers in Emergency Departments to Support Patients Presenting after an Opioid-Related Overdose," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Weijters, Bert & Geuens, Maggie & Schillewaert, Niels, 2009. "The proximity effect: The role of inter-item distance on reverse-item bias," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 2-12.
    3. Cheng-Han Leng & Hung-Yu Huang & Grace Yao, 2020. "A Social Desirability Item Response Theory Model: Retrieve–Deceive–Transfer," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(1), pages 56-74, March.
    4. Helsper, Ellen & Schneider, Luc & van Deursen, Alexander J. A. M. & van Laar, Ester, 2020. "The youth skills digital indicator: report on the conceptualisation and development of the ySkills digital skills measure," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108878, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. William Foddy, 1998. "An Empirical Evaluation of In-Depth Probes Used to Pretest Survey Questions," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 27(1), pages 103-133, August.
    6. William Foddy, 1996. "The in-depth testing of survey questions: A critical appraisal of methods," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 361-370, November.
    7. Parra, Diana C. & Gomez, Luis F. & Sarmiento, Olga L. & Buchner, David & Brownson, Ross & Schimd, Thomas & Gomez, Viviola & Lobelo, Felipe, 2010. "Perceived and objective neighborhood environment attributes and health related quality of life among the elderly in Bogotá, Colombia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(7), pages 1070-1076, April.
    8. Lazo, Jeffrey K & McClain, Katherine T, 1996. "Community perceptions, environmental impacts, and energy policy : Rail shipment of coal," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 531-540, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:49:y:2015:i:5:p:1897-1918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.