IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v49y2015i3p1081-1099.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative quality control from qualitative data: control charts with latent semantic analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Triss Ashton
  • Nicholas Evangelopoulos
  • Victor Prybutok

Abstract

Large quantities of data, often referred to as big data, are now held by companies. This big data includes statements of customer opinion regarding product or service quality in an unstructured textual form. While many tools exist to extract meaningful information from big data, automation tools do not exist to monitor the ongoing conceptual content of that data. We use latent semantic analysis to extract concept factors related to service quality categories. Customer comments found in the data that express dissatisfaction are then considered as representing a non-conforming observation in a process. Once factors are extracted, proportions of nonconformities for service quality failure categories are plotted on a control chart. The results are easily interpreted and the approach allows for the quantitative evaluation of customer acceptance of system process improvement initiatives. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Triss Ashton & Nicholas Evangelopoulos & Victor Prybutok, 2015. "Quantitative quality control from qualitative data: control charts with latent semantic analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 1081-1099, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:49:y:2015:i:3:p:1081-1099
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-014-0036-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-014-0036-5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-014-0036-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michele Cocco & Arjuna Tuzzi, 2013. "New data collection modes for surveys: a comparative analysis of the influence of survey mode on question-wording effects," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 3135-3152, October.
    2. Michael Scharkow, 2013. "Thematic content analysis using supervised machine learning: An empirical evaluation using German online news," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 761-773, February.
    3. Jane Fielding & Nigel Fielding & Graham Hughes, 2013. "Opening up open-ended survey data using qualitative software," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 3261-3276, October.
    4. Scott Deerwester & Susan T. Dumais & George W. Furnas & Thomas K. Landauer & Richard Harshman, 1990. "Indexing by latent semantic analysis," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 41(6), pages 391-407, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aykroyd, Robert G. & Leiva, Víctor & Ruggeri, Fabrizio, 2019. "Recent developments of control charts, identification of big data sources and future trends of current research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 221-232.
    2. Zavala, Araceli & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel, 2019. "Visual analytics for identifying product disruptions and effects via social media," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 544-559.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Irina Wedel & Michael Palk & Stefan Voß, 2022. "A Bilingual Comparison of Sentiment and Topics for a Product Event on Twitter," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 1635-1646, October.
    2. Mohammed Salem Binwahlan, 2023. "Polynomial Networks Model for Arabic Text Summarization," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 10(2), pages 74-84, February.
    3. Curci, Ylenia & Mongeau Ospina, Christian A., 2016. "Investigating biofuels through network analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 60-72.
    4. Chao Wei & Senlin Luo & Xincheng Ma & Hao Ren & Ji Zhang & Limin Pan, 2016. "Locally Embedding Autoencoders: A Semi-Supervised Manifold Learning Approach of Document Representation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Maksym Polyakov & Morteza Chalak & Md. Sayed Iftekhar & Ram Pandit & Sorada Tapsuwan & Fan Zhang & Chunbo Ma, 2018. "Authorship, Collaboration, Topics, and Research Gaps in Environmental and Resource Economics 1991–2015," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(1), pages 217-239, September.
    6. Ding, Ying, 2011. "Community detection: Topological vs. topical," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 498-514.
    7. Klaus Gugler & Florian Szücs & Ulrich Wohak, 2023. "Start-up Acquisitions, Venture Capital and Innovation: A Comparative Study of Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft," Department of Economics Working Papers wuwp340, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Department of Economics.
    8. Md Nazrul Islam & Md Mofazzal Hossain & Md Shafayet Shahed Ornob, 2024. "Business research on Industry 4.0: a systematic review using topic modelling approach," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Juan Shi & Kin Keung Lai & Ping Hu & Gang Chen, 2018. "Factors dominating individual information disseminating behavior on social networking sites," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 121-139, June.
    10. Heidi Reed, 2024. "“When money is more valuable than people…”: The pandemic as a call for business to care," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 435-455, March.
    11. Ganesh Dash & Chetan Sharma & Shamneesh Sharma, 2023. "Sustainable Marketing and the Role of Social Media: An Experimental Study Using Natural Language Processing (NLP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Paola Cerchiello & Giancarlo Nicola, 2018. "Assessing News Contagion in Finance," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Shr-Wei Kao & Pin Luarn, 2020. "Topic Modeling Analysis of Social Enterprises: Twitter Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    14. Gissler, Stefan & Oldfather, Jeremy & Ruffino, Doriana, 2016. "Lending on hold: Regulatory uncertainty and bank lending standards," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 89-101.
    15. Wittek, Peter, 2013. "Two-way incremental seriation in the temporal domain with three-dimensional visualization: Making sense of evolving high-dimensional datasets," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 193-201.
    16. Alina Evstigneeva & Mark Sidorovskiy, 2021. "Assessment of Clarity of Bank of Russia Monetary Policy Communication by Neural Network Approach," Russian Journal of Money and Finance, Bank of Russia, vol. 80(3), pages 3-33, September.
    17. Arno de Caigny & Kristof Coussement & Koen W. de Bock & Stefan Lessmann, 2019. "Incorporating textual information in customer churn prediction models based on a convolutional neural network," Post-Print hal-02275958, HAL.
    18. Hei-Chia Wang & Tzu-Ting Hsu & Yunita Sari, 2019. "Personal research idea recommendation using research trends and a hierarchical topic model," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(3), pages 1385-1406, December.
    19. Borke, Lukas & Härdle, Wolfgang Karl, 2016. "Q3-D3-Lsa," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2016-049, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    20. Hiroaki Sugino & Tatsuya Sekiguchi & Yuuki Terada & Naoki Hayashi, 2023. "“Future Compass”, a Tool That Allows Us to See the Right Horizon—Integration of Topic Modeling and Multiple-Factor Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:49:y:2015:i:3:p:1081-1099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.