Goodness-of-fit measures for multiple correspondence analysis
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1007/BF01107980
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Eric Holman, 1972. "The relation between hierarchical and euclidean models for psychological distances," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 37(4), pages 417-423, December.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Cecilia Temilola Olugbara & Moeketsi Letseka & Oludayo O. Olugbara, 2021. "Multiple Correspondence Analysis of Factors Influencing Student Acceptance of Massive Open Online Courses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, December.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Geert Soete & Wayne DeSarbo & J. Carroll, 1985. "Optimal variable weighting for hierarchical clustering: An alternating least-squares algorithm," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 2(1), pages 173-192, December.
- Shmuel Sattath & Amos Tversky, 1977. "Additive similarity trees," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(3), pages 319-345, September.
- J. Carroll, 1976. "Spatial, non-spatial and hybrid models for scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 41(4), pages 439-463, December.
- Martin Young & Wayne DeSarbo, 1995. "A parametric procedure for ultrametric tree estimation from conditional rank order proximity data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 60(1), pages 47-75, March.
- L J Hubert & R G Golledge & G D Richardson, 1982. "Proximity Matrix Reorganization and Hierarchical Clustering," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 14(2), pages 195-203, February.
- Elrod, Terry & Keane, Michael, 1995. "A Factor-Analytic Probit Model for Representing the Market Structure in Panel Data," MPRA Paper 52434, University Library of Munich, Germany.
More about this item
Keywords
multiple correspondence analysis (MCA); failure of the variance criterion; goodness-of-fit measures; factor analytical interpretation of MCA; cluster analytical interpretation of MCA;All these keywords.
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:29:y:1995:i:1:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.