IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v37y1972i4p417-423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relation between hierarchical and euclidean models for psychological distances

Author

Listed:
  • Eric Holman

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric Holman, 1972. "The relation between hierarchical and euclidean models for psychological distances," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 37(4), pages 417-423, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:37:y:1972:i:4:p:417-423
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02291218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02291218
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02291218?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Lingoes, 1971. "Some boundary conditions for a monotone analysis of symmetric matrices," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 36(2), pages 195-203, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johann Bacher, 1995. "Goodness-of-fit measures for multiple correspondence analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Elrod, Terry & Keane, Michael, 1995. "A Factor-Analytic Probit Model for Representing the Market Structure in Panel Data," MPRA Paper 52434, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. L J Hubert & R G Golledge & G D Richardson, 1982. "Proximity Matrix Reorganization and Hierarchical Clustering," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 14(2), pages 195-203, February.
    4. Geert Soete & Wayne DeSarbo & J. Carroll, 1985. "Optimal variable weighting for hierarchical clustering: An alternating least-squares algorithm," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 2(1), pages 173-192, December.
    5. Shmuel Sattath & Amos Tversky, 1977. "Additive similarity trees," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(3), pages 319-345, September.
    6. Martin Young & Wayne DeSarbo, 1995. "A parametric procedure for ultrametric tree estimation from conditional rank order proximity data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 60(1), pages 47-75, March.
    7. J. Carroll, 1976. "Spatial, non-spatial and hybrid models for scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 41(4), pages 439-463, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. Fernando Vera & Rodrigo Macías, 2021. "On the Behaviour of K-Means Clustering of a Dissimilarity Matrix by Means of Full Multidimensional Scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 489-513, June.
    2. Francis Caillez & Pascale Kuntz, 1996. "A contribution to the study of the metric and Euclidean structures of dissimilarities," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(2), pages 241-253, June.
    3. Cecilio Mar-Molinero & Carlos Serrano-Cinca, 2001. "Bank failure: a multidimensional scaling approach," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 165-183.
    4. W. J. Krzanowski, 2004. "Biplots for Multifactorial Analysis of Distance," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 517-524, June.
    5. Victor Chepoi & Bernard Fichet & Morgan Seston, 2009. "Seriation in the Presence of Errors: NP-Hardness of l ∞ -Fitting Robinson Structures to Dissimilarity Matrices," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 26(3), pages 279-296, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:37:y:1972:i:4:p:417-423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.