IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v89y2024i4d10.1007_s11336-024-10000-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Evasive Response Bias in Randomized Response: Cheater Detection Versus Self-protective No-Saying

Author

Listed:
  • Khadiga H. A. Sayed

    (Utrecht University
    Cairo University)

  • Maarten J. L. F. Cruyff

    (Utrecht University)

  • Peter G. M. Heijden

    (Utrecht University
    University of Southampton)

Abstract

Randomized response is an interview technique for sensitive questions designed to eliminate evasive response bias. Since this elimination is only partially successful, two models have been proposed for modeling evasive response bias: the cheater detection model for a design with two sub-samples with different randomization probabilities and the self-protective no sayers model for a design with multiple sensitive questions. This paper shows the correspondence between these models, and introduces models for the new, hybrid “ever/last year” design that account for self-protective no saying and cheating. The model for one set of ever/last year questions has a degree of freedom that can be used for the inclusion of a response bias parameter. Models with multiple degrees of freedom are introduced for extensions of the design with a third randomized response question and a second set of ever/last year questions. The models are illustrated with two surveys on doping use. We conclude with a discussion of the pros and cons of the ever/last year design and its potential for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Khadiga H. A. Sayed & Maarten J. L. F. Cruyff & Peter G. M. Heijden, 2024. "Modeling Evasive Response Bias in Randomized Response: Cheater Detection Versus Self-protective No-Saying," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 89(4), pages 1261-1279, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:89:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11336-024-10000-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-024-10000-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11336-024-10000-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11336-024-10000-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:89:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11336-024-10000-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.