IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v80y2015i4p880-896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Manifest Monotonicity Using Bayes Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Jesper Tijmstra
  • Herbert Hoijtink
  • Klaas Sijtsma

Abstract

The assumption of latent monotonicity in item response theory models for dichotomous data cannot be evaluated directly, but observable consequences such as manifest monotonicity facilitate the assessment of latent monotonicity in real data. Standard methods for evaluating manifest monotonicity typically produce a test statistic that is geared toward falsification, which can only provide indirect support in favor of manifest monotonicity. We propose the use of Bayes factors to quantify the degree of support available in the data in favor of manifest monotonicity or against manifest monotonicity. Through the use of informative hypotheses, this procedure can also be used to determine the support for manifest monotonicity over substantively or statistically relevant alternatives to manifest monotonicity, rendering the procedure highly flexible. The performance of the procedure is evaluated using a simulation study, and the application of the procedure is illustrated using empirical data. Copyright The Author(s) 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Jesper Tijmstra & Herbert Hoijtink & Klaas Sijtsma, 2015. "Evaluating Manifest Monotonicity Using Bayes Factors," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(4), pages 880-896, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:80:y:2015:i:4:p:880-896
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-015-9475-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11336-015-9475-8
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11336-015-9475-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hartmann Scheiblechner, 2003. "Nonparametric IRT: Testing the bi-isotonicity of isotonic probabilistic models (ISOP)," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 68(1), pages 79-96, March.
    2. Jesper Tijmstra & David Hessen & Peter Heijden & Klaas Sijtsma, 2013. "Testing Manifest Monotonicity Using Order-Constrained Statistical Inference," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 83-97, January.
    3. L. Ark, 2005. "Stochastic Ordering Of the Latent Trait by the Sum Score Under Various Polytomous IRT Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 70(2), pages 283-304, June.
    4. J. Ramsay, 1991. "Kernel smoothing approaches to nonparametric item characteristic curve estimation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(4), pages 611-630, December.
    5. Michal Abrahamowicz & James Ramsay, 1992. "Multicategorical spline model for item response theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 5-27, March.
    6. Paul Rosenbaum, 1984. "Testing the conditional independence and monotonicity assumptions of item response theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 49(3), pages 425-435, September.
    7. D. Grayson, 1988. "Two-group classification in latent trait theory: Scores with monotone likelihood ratio," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 53(3), pages 383-392, September.
    8. Bas Hemker & Klaas Sijtsma & Ivo Molenaar & Brian Junker, 1997. "Stochastic ordering using the latent trait and the sum score in polytomous IRT models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 331-347, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rudy Ligtvoet, 2022. "Incomplete Tests of Conditional Association for the Assessment of Model Assumptions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(4), pages 1214-1237, December.
    2. Jesper Tijmstra & Maria Bolsinova, 2019. "Bayes Factors for Evaluating Latent Monotonicity in Polytomous Item Response Theory Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(3), pages 846-869, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rudy Ligtvoet, 2022. "Incomplete Tests of Conditional Association for the Assessment of Model Assumptions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(4), pages 1214-1237, December.
    2. Wim Linden, 1998. "Stochastic order in dichotomous item response models for fixed, adaptive, and multidimensional tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 63(3), pages 211-226, September.
    3. J. Straat & L. Ark & Klaas Sijtsma, 2013. "Comparing Optimization Algorithms for Item Selection in Mokken Scale Analysis," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 30(1), pages 75-99, April.
    4. Jesper Tijmstra & Maria Bolsinova, 2019. "Bayes Factors for Evaluating Latent Monotonicity in Polytomous Item Response Theory Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(3), pages 846-869, September.
    5. van der Ark, L. Andries, 2012. "New Developments in Mokken Scale Analysis in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i05).
    6. L. Ark & Wicher Bergsma, 2010. "A Note on Stochastic Ordering of the Latent Trait Using the Sum of Polytomous Item Scores," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(2), pages 272-279, June.
    7. Johnson, Matthew S., 2007. "Modeling dichotomous item responses with free-knot splines," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 4178-4192, May.
    8. Rudy Ligtvoet, 2012. "An Isotonic Partial Credit Model for Ordering Subjects on the Basis of Their Sum Scores," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 479-494, July.
    9. Daphna Harel & Russell J. Steele, 2018. "An Information Matrix Test for the Collapsing of Categories Under the Partial Credit Model," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 43(6), pages 721-750, December.
    10. Samantha Bouwmeester & Klaas Sijtsma, 2004. "Measuring the ability of transitive reasoning, using product and strategy information," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 69(1), pages 123-146, March.
    11. Jules Ellis & Brian Junker, 1997. "Tail-measurability in monotone latent variable models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 62(4), pages 495-523, December.
    12. Leonard Paas & Klaas Sijtsma, 2008. "Nonparametric item response theory for investigating dimensionality of marketing scales: A SERVQUAL application," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 157-170, June.
    13. Klaas Sijtsma & Rob Meijer, 2001. "The person response function as a tool in person-fit research," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(2), pages 191-207, June.
    14. L. Ark, 2005. "Stochastic Ordering Of the Latent Trait by the Sum Score Under Various Polytomous IRT Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 70(2), pages 283-304, June.
    15. Robert Zwitser & Gunter Maris, 2016. "Ordering Individuals with Sum Scores: The Introduction of the Nonparametric Rasch Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(1), pages 39-59, March.
    16. Xueli Xu & Jeff Douglas, 2006. "Computerized adaptive testing under nonparametric IRT models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(1), pages 121-137, March.
    17. Jules L. Ellis & Klaas Sijtsma, 2023. "A Test to Distinguish Monotone Homogeneity from Monotone Multifactor Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 387-412, June.
    18. Francesco Bartolucci & Antonio Forcina, 2005. "Likelihood inference on the underlying structure of IRT models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 70(1), pages 31-43, March.
    19. Christian Genest & Johanna G. Nešlehová, 2014. "A Conversation with James O. Ramsay," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 161-183, August.
    20. Jesper Tijmstra & David Hessen & Peter Heijden & Klaas Sijtsma, 2013. "Testing Manifest Monotonicity Using Order-Constrained Statistical Inference," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 83-97, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:80:y:2015:i:4:p:880-896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.