IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v77y2012i3p543-560.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Confidence Bounds and Power for the Reliability of Observational Measures on the Quality of a Social Setting

Author

Listed:
  • Yongyun Shin
  • Stephen Raudenbush

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongyun Shin & Stephen Raudenbush, 2012. "Confidence Bounds and Power for the Reliability of Observational Measures on the Quality of a Social Setting," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 543-560, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:77:y:2012:i:3:p:543-560
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-012-9266-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11336-012-9266-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11336-012-9266-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yongyun Shin & Stephen W. Raudenbush, 2010. "A Latent Cluster-Mean Approach to the Contextual Effects Model With Missing Data," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 35(1), pages 26-53, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew Bell & Malcolm Fairbrother & Kelvyn Jones, 2019. "Fixed and random effects models: making an informed choice," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 1051-1074, March.
    2. Nicholas J. Rockwood, 2020. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Multilevel Structural Equation Models with Random Slopes for Latent Covariates," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(2), pages 275-300, June.
    3. Jeong, Tay, 2022. "Contextual fallacy in MLMs with cross-level interaction: A critical review of neighborhood effects on psychiatric resilience," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    4. Satoshi Usami, 2017. "Generalized SAMPLE SIZE Determination Formulas for Investigating Contextual Effects by a Three-Level Random Intercept Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(1), pages 133-157, March.
    5. Simon Grund & Oliver Lüdtke & Alexander Robitzsch, 2018. "Multiple Imputation of Missing Data at Level 2: A Comparison of Fully Conditional and Joint Modeling in Multilevel Designs," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 43(3), pages 316-353, June.
    6. Bell, Andrew & Jones, Kelvyn, 2015. "Explaining Fixed Effects: Random Effects Modeling of Time-Series Cross-Sectional and Panel Data," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 133-153, January.
    7. Keenan A. Pituch & Laura M. Stapleton, 2012. "Distinguishing Between Cross- and Cluster-Level Mediation Processes in the Cluster Randomized Trial," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 41(4), pages 630-670, November.
    8. Regnerus, Mark, 2017. "Is structural stigma's effect on the mortality of sexual minorities robust? A failure to replicate the results of a published study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 157-165.
    9. Katherine E. Castellano & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh & Anders Skrondal, 2014. "Composition, Context, and Endogeneity in School and Teacher Comparisons," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 39(5), pages 333-367, October.
    10. Stephen A. Mistler & Craig K. Enders, 2017. "A Comparison of Joint Model and Fully Conditional Specification Imputation for Multilevel Missing Data," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 42(4), pages 432-466, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:77:y:2012:i:3:p:543-560. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.