IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v71y2006i3p457-461.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurement without Copper Instruments and Experiment without Complete Control

Author

Listed:
  • Willem Heiser

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Willem Heiser, 2006. "Measurement without Copper Instruments and Experiment without Complete Control," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 457-461, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:71:y:2006:i:3:p:457-461
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-006-1501-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11336-006-1501-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11336-006-1501-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Denny Borsboom, 2006. "The attack of the psychometricians," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 425-440, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Denny Borsboom, 2006. "Can We Bring about a Velvet Revolution in Psychological Measurement? a Rejoinder to Commentaries," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 463-467, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Denny Borsboom, 2022. "Possible Futures for Network Psychometrics," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(1), pages 253-265, March.
    2. Gabriel Olaru & Jeremy Burrus & Carolyn MacCann & Franklin M Zaromb & Oliver Wilhelm & Richard D Roberts, 2019. "Situational Judgment Tests as a method for measuring personality: Development and validity evidence for a test of Dependability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Martin Biehler & Heinz Holling & Philipp Doebler, 2015. "Saddlepoint Approximations of the Distribution of the Person Parameter in the Two Parameter Logistic Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 665-688, September.
    4. Klaas Sijtsma, 2006. "Psychometrics in Psychological Research: Role Model or Partner in Science?," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 451-455, September.
    5. Klaas Sijtsma, 2016. "Playing with Data—Or How to Discourage Questionable Research Practices and Stimulate Researchers to Do Things Right," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(1), pages 1-15, March.
    6. César Viloria-Núñez & Marcela Tovar & Anthony Constant Millán, 2023. "Digital archetypes: a tool for understanding personality characteristics in the digital culture," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Leann Schneider & Ulrich Schimmack, 2009. "Self-Informant Agreement in Well-Being Ratings: A Meta-Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 363-376, December.
    8. Ulrich Schimmack, 2008. "Measuring Wellbeing in the SOEP," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 145, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    9. Steven Andrew Culpepper & Herman Aguinis & Justin L. Kern & Roger Millsap, 2019. "High-Stakes Testing Case Study: A Latent Variable Approach for Assessing Measurement and Prediction Invariance," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(1), pages 285-309, March.
    10. Omar N. Solinger & Woody van Olffen & Robert A. Roe & Joeri Hofmans, 2013. "On Becoming (Un)Committed: A Taxonomy and Test of Newcomer Onboarding Scenarios," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(6), pages 1640-1661, December.
    11. Anthony Clairmont & Andrew Maul, 2019. "A Review of “Sociocognitive Foundations of Educational Measurement” by Robert Mislevy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(4), pages 1097-1100, December.
    12. Lisa D. Wijsen & Denny Borsboom, 2021. "Perspectives on Psychometrics Interviews with 20 Past Psychometric Society Presidents," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(1), pages 327-343, March.
    13. Lisa D. Wijsen & Denny Borsboom & Tiago Cabaço & Willem J. Heiser, 2019. "An Academic Genealogy of Psychometric Society Presidents," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(2), pages 562-588, June.
    14. Mark Wilson, 2013. "Seeking a Balance Between the Statistical and Scientific Elements in Psychometrics," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(2), pages 211-236, April.
    15. Mair, Patrick & Hatzinger, Reinhold, 2007. "Extended Rasch Modeling: The eRm Package for the Application of IRT Models in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 20(i09).
    16. Michael Kane, 2006. "In Praise of Pluralism. A Comment on Borsboom," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 441-445, September.
    17. Cadogan, John W. & Lee, Nick, 2013. "Improper use of endogenous formative variables," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 233-241.
    18. Myszkowski, Nils & Storme, Martin, 2018. "A snapshot of g? Binary and polytomous item-response theory investigations of the last series of the Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM-LS)," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 109-116.
    19. Michael Wintroub, 2020. "Sordid genealogies: a conjectural history of Cambridge Analytica’s eugenic roots," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Pascal Jordan & Meike C Shedden-Mora & Bernd Löwe, 2017. "Psychometric analysis of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) in primary care using modern item response theory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:71:y:2006:i:3:p:457-461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.