IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v49y1984i4p501-519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A response model for multiple choice items

Author

Listed:
  • David Thissen
  • Lynne Steinberg

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • David Thissen & Lynne Steinberg, 1984. "A response model for multiple choice items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 49(4), pages 501-519, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:49:y:1984:i:4:p:501-519
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02302588
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02302588
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02302588?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Darrell Bock, 1972. "Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 37(1), pages 29-51, March.
    2. Frederic Lord, 1983. "Maximum likelihood estimation of item response parameters when some responses are omitted," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 48(3), pages 477-482, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Irini Moustaki & Martin Knott, 2000. "Generalized latent trait models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 391-411, September.
    2. Laine Bradshaw & Jonathan Templin, 2014. "Combining Item Response Theory and Diagnostic Classification Models: A Psychometric Model for Scaling Ability and Diagnosing Misconceptions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 403-425, July.
    3. Michal Abrahamowicz & James Ramsay, 1992. "Multicategorical spline model for item response theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 5-27, March.
    4. Henk Kelderman & Carl Rijkes, 1994. "Loglinear multidimensional IRT models for polytomously scored items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 149-176, June.
    5. Daniel Bolt & James Wollack & Youngsuk Suh, 2012. "Application of a Multidimensional Nested Logit Model to Multiple-Choice Test Items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(2), pages 339-357, April.
    6. Ivo Molenaar, 1998. "Data, model, conclusion, doing it again," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 315-340, December.
    7. Matthew D. Finkelman & Giles Hooker & Zhen Wang, 2010. "Prevalence and Magnitude of Paradoxical Results in Multidimensional Item Response Theory," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 35(6), pages 744-761, December.
    8. Dylan Molenaar, 2015. "Heteroscedastic Latent Trait Models for Dichotomous Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 625-644, September.
    9. David Budescu & Yuanchao Bo, 2015. "Analyzing Test-Taking Behavior: Decision Theory Meets Psychometric Theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(4), pages 1105-1122, December.
    10. David Thissen & Lynne Steinberg, 1986. "A taxonomy of item response models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(4), pages 567-577, December.
    11. Ulf Böckenholt, 2012. "The Cognitive-Miser Response Model: Testing for Intuitive and Deliberate Reasoning," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(2), pages 388-399, April.
    12. Norman Cliff & John Donoghue, 1992. "Ordinal test fidelity estimated by an item sampling model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 217-236, June.
    13. Javier Revuelta, 2010. "Estimating Difficulty from Polytomous Categorical Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(2), pages 331-350, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jouni Kuha & Myrsini Katsikatsou & Irini Moustaki, 2018. "Latent variable modelling with non‐ignorable item non‐response: multigroup response propensity models for cross‐national analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 181(4), pages 1169-1192, October.
    2. Jiwei Zhang & Zhaoyuan Zhang & Jian Tao, 2021. "A Bayesian algorithm based on auxiliary variables for estimating GRM with non-ignorable missing data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 2643-2669, December.
    3. Luo, Nanyu & Ji, Feng & Han, Yuting & He, Jinbo & Zhang, Xiaoya, 2024. "Fitting item response theory models using deep learning computational frameworks," OSF Preprints tjxab, Center for Open Science.
    4. Michelle M. LaMar, 2018. "Markov Decision Process Measurement Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(1), pages 67-88, March.
    5. Bas Hemker & Klaas Sijtsma & Ivo Molenaar & Brian Junker, 1996. "Polytomous IRT models and monotone likelihood ratio of the total score," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 679-693, December.
    6. Sijia Huang & Li Cai, 2024. "Cross-Classified Item Response Theory Modeling With an Application to Student Evaluation of Teaching," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 49(3), pages 311-341, June.
    7. Björn Andersson & Tao Xin, 2021. "Estimation of Latent Regression Item Response Theory Models Using a Second-Order Laplace Approximation," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(2), pages 244-265, April.
    8. Laine Bradshaw & Jonathan Templin, 2014. "Combining Item Response Theory and Diagnostic Classification Models: A Psychometric Model for Scaling Ability and Diagnosing Misconceptions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 403-425, July.
    9. Javier Revuelta, 2004. "Analysis of distractor difficulty in multiple-choice items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 69(2), pages 217-234, June.
    10. Ulf Böckenholt, 2012. "The Cognitive-Miser Response Model: Testing for Intuitive and Deliberate Reasoning," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(2), pages 388-399, April.
    11. Hongwen Guo, 2017. "Predicting Rights-Only Score Distributions from Data Collected Under Formula Score Instructions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(1), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Albert Yu & Jeffrey A. Douglas, 2023. "IRT Models for Learning With Item-Specific Learning Parameters," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 48(6), pages 866-888, December.
    13. John Hsu & Tom Leonard & Kam-Wah Tsui, 1991. "Statistical inference for multiple choice tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 327-348, June.
    14. Ghattas Badih & Michel Pierre & Boyer Laurent, 2019. "Assessing variable importance in clustering: a new method based on unsupervised binary decision trees," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 301-321, March.
    15. Yu-Wei Chang & Rung-Ching Tsai & Nan-Jung Hsu, 2014. "A Speeded Item Response Model: Leave the Harder till Later," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 255-274, April.
    16. repec:hal:journl:hal-03533356 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Zachary F. Fisher & Kenneth A. Bollen, 2020. "An Instrumental Variable Estimator for Mixed Indicators: Analytic Derivatives and Alternative Parameterizations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(3), pages 660-683, September.
    18. Gunter Maris & Han Maas, 2012. "Speed-Accuracy Response Models: Scoring Rules based on Response Time and Accuracy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 615-633, October.
    19. Irini Moustaki & Martin Knott, 2000. "Generalized latent trait models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 391-411, September.
    20. Yingbin Zhang & Zhaoxi Yang & Yehui Wang, 2022. "The Impact of Extreme Response Style on the Mean Comparison of Two Independent Samples," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    21. repec:jss:jstsof:35:i12 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Dylan Molenaar, 2015. "Heteroscedastic Latent Trait Models for Dichotomous Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 625-644, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:49:y:1984:i:4:p:501-519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.