IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v36y2021i4d10.1007_s00180-021-01100-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bayesian algorithm based on auxiliary variables for estimating GRM with non-ignorable missing data

Author

Listed:
  • Jiwei Zhang

    (Yunnan University)

  • Zhaoyuan Zhang

    (Yili Normal University)

  • Jian Tao

    (Northeast Normal University)

Abstract

In this paper, a highly effective Bayesian sampling algorithm based on auxiliary variables is used to estimate the graded response model with non-ignorable missing response data. Compared with the traditional marginal likelihood method and other Bayesian algorithms, the advantages of the new algorithm are discussed in detail. Based on the Markov Chain Monte Carlo samples from the posterior distributions, the deviance information criterion and the logarithm of the pseudomarignal likelihood are employed to compare the different missing mechanism models. Two simulation studies are conducted and a detailed analysis of the sexual compulsivity scale data is carried out to further illustrate the proposed methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiwei Zhang & Zhaoyuan Zhang & Jian Tao, 2021. "A Bayesian algorithm based on auxiliary variables for estimating GRM with non-ignorable missing data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 2643-2669, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:36:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s00180-021-01100-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-021-01100-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-021-01100-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-021-01100-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James J. Heckman, 1976. "The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models," NBER Chapters, in: Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, Volume 5, number 4, pages 475-492, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Geoff Masters, 1982. "A rasch model for partial credit scoring," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 47(2), pages 149-174, June.
    3. R. Bock & Murray Aitkin, 1981. "Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 46(4), pages 443-459, December.
    4. Irini Moustaki & Martin Knott, 2000. "Weighting for item non‐response in attitude scales by using latent variable models with covariates," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 163(3), pages 445-459.
    5. David J. Spiegelhalter & Nicola G. Best & Bradley P. Carlin & Angelika Van Der Linde, 2002. "Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(4), pages 583-639, October.
    6. R. Darrell Bock, 1972. "Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 37(1), pages 29-51, March.
    7. Jean-Paul Fox & Cees Glas, 2001. "Bayesian estimation of a multilevel IRT model using gibbs sampling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(2), pages 271-288, June.
    8. C. O'Muircheartaigh & I. Moustaki, 1999. "Symmetric pattern models: a latent variable approach to item non‐response in attitude scales," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 162(2), pages 177-194.
    9. A. Béguin & C. Glas, 2001. "MCMC estimation and some model-fit analysis of multidimensional IRT models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(4), pages 541-561, December.
    10. Mark Huisman, 2000. "Imputation of Missing Item Responses: Some Simple Techniques," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 331-351, November.
    11. Zhehan Jiang & Jonathan Templin, 2019. "Gibbs Samplers for Logistic Item Response Models via the Pólya–Gamma Distribution: A Computationally Efficient Data-Augmentation Strategy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(2), pages 358-374, June.
    12. Heckman, James, 2013. "Sample selection bias as a specification error," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
    13. Tutz, Gerhard, 1991. "Sequential models in categorical regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 275-295, May.
    14. Maurizio Carpita & Marica Manisera, 2011. "On the Imputation of Missing Data in Surveys with Likert-Type Scales," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 28(1), pages 93-112, April.
    15. Frederic Lord, 1983. "Maximum likelihood estimation of item response parameters when some responses are omitted," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 48(3), pages 477-482, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Norman Rose & Matthias Davier & Benjamin Nagengast, 2017. "Modeling Omitted and Not-Reached Items in IRT Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(3), pages 795-819, September.
    2. Jouni Kuha & Myrsini Katsikatsou & Irini Moustaki, 2018. "Latent variable modelling with non‐ignorable item non‐response: multigroup response propensity models for cross‐national analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 181(4), pages 1169-1192, October.
    3. Lai-Fa Hung & Wen-Chung Wang, 2012. "The Generalized Multilevel Facets Model for Longitudinal Data," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 37(2), pages 231-255, April.
    4. Azevedo, Caio L.N. & Bolfarine, Heleno & Andrade, Dalton F., 2011. "Bayesian inference for a skew-normal IRT model under the centred parameterization," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 353-365, January.
    5. Anders Skrondal & Sophia Rabe‐Hesketh, 2007. "Latent Variable Modelling: A Survey," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 34(4), pages 712-745, December.
    6. Gunter Maris & Timo Bechger & Ernesto Martin, 2015. "A Gibbs Sampler for the (Extended) Marginal Rasch Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(4), pages 859-879, December.
    7. Michael Edwards, 2010. "A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Approach to Confirmatory Item Factor Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(3), pages 474-497, September.
    8. Hanneke Geerlings & Cees Glas & Wim Linden, 2011. "Modeling Rule-Based Item Generation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 337-359, April.
    9. Albert Maydeu-Olivares & Harry Joe, 2006. "Limited Information Goodness-of-fit Testing in Multidimensional Contingency Tables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(4), pages 713-732, December.
    10. Yu-Wei Chang & Rung-Ching Tsai & Nan-Jung Hsu, 2014. "A Speeded Item Response Model: Leave the Harder till Later," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 255-274, April.
    11. Heleno Bolfarine & Jorge Luis Bazan, 2010. "Bayesian Estimation of the Logistic Positive Exponent IRT Model," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 35(6), pages 693-713, December.
    12. Dylan Molenaar, 2015. "Heteroscedastic Latent Trait Models for Dichotomous Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 625-644, September.
    13. Singh, Jagdip, 2004. "Tackling measurement problems with Item Response Theory: Principles, characteristics, and assessment, with an illustrative example," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 184-208, February.
    14. Azevedo, Caio L.N. & Andrade, Dalton F. & Fox, Jean-Paul, 2012. "A Bayesian generalized multiple group IRT model with model-fit assessment tools," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 4399-4412.
    15. Simon Grund & Oliver Lüdtke & Alexander Robitzsch, 2021. "On the Treatment of Missing Data in Background Questionnaires in Educational Large-Scale Assessments: An Evaluation of Different Procedures," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(4), pages 430-465, August.
    16. Silvana Bortolotti & Rafael Tezza & Dalton Andrade & Antonio Bornia & Afonso Sousa Júnior, 2013. "Relevance and advantages of using the item response theory," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 2341-2360, June.
    17. Javier Revuelta, 2008. "The generalized Logit-Linear Item Response Model for Binary-Designed Items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 73(3), pages 385-405, September.
    18. Li C. Liu & Donald Hedeker, 2006. "A Mixed-Effects Regression Model for Longitudinal Multivariate Ordinal Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 261-268, March.
    19. Frank Rijmen & Minjeong Jeon & Matthias von Davier & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2014. "A Third-Order Item Response Theory Model for Modeling the Effects of Domains and Subdomains in Large-Scale Educational Assessment Surveys," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 39(4), pages 235-256, August.
    20. Li Cai, 2010. "High-dimensional Exploratory Item Factor Analysis by A Metropolis–Hastings Robbins–Monro Algorithm," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 33-57, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:36:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s00180-021-01100-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.