IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v18y1953i1p57-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An application of confidence intervals and of maximum likelihood to the estimation of an examinee's ability

Author

Listed:
  • Frederic Lord

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Frederic Lord, 1953. "An application of confidence intervals and of maximum likelihood to the estimation of an examinee's ability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 18(1), pages 57-76, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:18:y:1953:i:1:p:57-76
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02289028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02289028
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02289028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George Ferguson, 1942. "Item selection by the constant process," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 7(1), pages 19-29, March.
    2. Maurice Lorr, 1944. "Interrelationships of number-correct and limen scores for an amount-limit test," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 9(1), pages 17-30, March.
    3. Harold Gulliksen, 1945. "The relation of item difficulty and inter-item correlation to test variance and reliability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 10(2), pages 79-91, June.
    4. Ledyard Tucker, 1946. "Maximum validity of a test with equivalent items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, March.
    5. M. Richardson, 1936. "The relation between the difficulty and the differential validity of a test," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 1(2), pages 33-49, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Viera Gáfriková, 1987. "On nonparametric latent trait models," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 71-79, March.
    2. Ogasawara, Haruhiko, 2013. "Asymptotic properties of the Bayes and pseudo Bayes estimators of ability in item response theory," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 359-377.
    3. Paul Holland, 1981. "When are item response models consistent with observed data?," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 79-92, March.
    4. Ogasawara, Haruhiko, 2013. "Asymptotic cumulants of ability estimators using fallible item parameters," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 144-162.
    5. Frederic Lord, 1971. "A theoretical study of two-stage testing," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 36(3), pages 227-242, September.
    6. Dandan Chen & Jinming Zhang, 2020. "A Review of “A Course in Item Response Theory and Modeling with Stata” by Raykov and Marcoulides," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(3), pages 837-840, September.
    7. A. D. Slepkov & M. L. Van Bussel & K. M. Fitze & W. S. Burr, 2021. "A Baseline for Multiple-Choice Testing in the University Classroom," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    8. Mark Reiser, 1989. "An Application of the Item-Response Model to Psychiatric Epidemiology," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 18(1), pages 66-103, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M.-L. Feddag, 2016. "Pairwise likelihood estimation for the normal ogive model with binary data," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 100(2), pages 223-237, April.
    2. John E. Hunter & Gerald M. Gillmore, 1974. "A Memory Search Model of Reliability," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 2(3), pages 281-311, February.
    3. Frank Baker, 1965. "An investigation of the sampling distributions of item discrimination indices," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 30(2), pages 165-178, June.
    4. Harold Webster, 1957. "Item selection methods for increasing test homogeneity," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 22(4), pages 395-404, December.
    5. David Thissen & Lynne Steinberg, 1986. "A taxonomy of item response models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(4), pages 567-577, December.
    6. William Meredith, 1965. "Some results based on a general stochastic model for mental tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 30(4), pages 419-440, December.
    7. Robert Wherry & Richard Gaylord, 1944. "Factor pattern of test items and tests as a function of the correlation coefficient: Content, difficulty, and constant error factors," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 9(4), pages 237-244, December.
    8. Frederic Lord, 1952. "The relation of the reliability of multiple-choice tests to the distribution of item difficulties," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 17(2), pages 181-194, June.
    9. Helmer Johnson, 1950. "Test reliability and correction for attenuation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 15(2), pages 115-119, June.
    10. Lee Cronbach & Willard Warrington, 1952. "Efficiency of multiple-choice tests as a function of spread of item difficulties," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 17(2), pages 127-147, June.
    11. N. Verhelst & C. Glas, 1993. "A dynamic generalization of the Rasch model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(3), pages 395-415, September.
    12. James Birren & Jack Botwinick, 1951. "Rate of addition as a function of difficulty and age," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(2), pages 219-232, June.
    13. George Ferguson, 1949. "On the theory of test discrimination," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 14(1), pages 61-68, March.
    14. Lawrence W. C. Lai & Winky K. O. Ho, 2001. "A Probit Analysis of Development Control: A Hong Kong Case Study of Residential Zones," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(13), pages 2425-2437, December.
    15. Maurice Lorr, 1944. "Interrelationships of number-correct and limen scores for an amount-limit test," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 9(1), pages 17-30, March.
    16. Hubert Brogden, 1946. "Variation in test validity with variation in the distribution of item difficulties, number of items, and degree of their intercorrelation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 11(4), pages 197-214, December.
    17. D. Finney, 1944. "The application of probit analysis to the results of mental tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 9(1), pages 31-39, March.
    18. Janet Elashoff, 1969. "Optimal choice of rater terms I: Theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 34(1), pages 21-32, March.
    19. Charles Mosier & John McQuitty, 1940. "Methods of item validation and abacs for item-test correlation and critical ratio of upper-lower difference," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 5(1), pages 57-65, March.
    20. David J. Bartholomew & Ian J. Deary & Martin Lawn, 2009. "Sir Godfrey Thomson: a statistical pioneer," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(2), pages 467-482, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:18:y:1953:i:1:p:57-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.