IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v38y2020i1d10.1007_s40273-019-00849-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Burden of Anxiety Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Konnopka

    (University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
    Hamburg Center for Health Economics)

  • Hannah König

    (University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
    Hamburg Center for Health Economics)

Abstract

Background Anxiety disorders (AD) are common mental disorders, for which several cost-of-illness (COI) studies have been conducted in the past. Objective The aim of this review was to provide a systematic overview of these studies and an aggregation of their results. Methods A systematic literature search limited to studies published after 1999 was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE in November 2018. We included top-down COI studies reporting costs for AD, and bottom-up COI studies reporting costs for AD and a non-diseased control group, and extracted data manually. Results of the top-down COI studies were aggregated by calculating the mean percentage of costs on gross domestic product (GDP) and health expenditure, while the results of the bottom-up studies were analyzed meta-analytically using the ‘ratio of means’ method and inverse-variance pooling. In this review, the logarithm of the relative difference in a continuous outcome between two groups is calculated and aggregated over the studies. The results can be interpreted as the relative change in costs imposed by a specific disease compared with baseline costs. Results We identified 13 top-down and 11 bottom-up COI studies. All top-down COI studies and four bottom-up COI studies reported costs for AD as a diagnostic group, four for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), four for social anxiety disorder (SAD), and one for panic disorder. In top-down COI studies, direct costs of AD, on average, corresponded to 2.08% of health care costs and 0.22% of GDP, whereas indirect costs, on average, corresponded to 0.23% of GDP. In bottom-up COI studies, direct costs of patients with AD were increased by factor 2.17 (1.29–3.67; p = 0.004) and indirect costs were increased by factor 1.92 (1.05–3.53; p = 0.04), whereas total costs increased by factor 2.52 (1.73–3.68; p

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Konnopka & Hannah König, 2020. "Economic Burden of Anxiety Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 25-37, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:38:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s40273-019-00849-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-019-00849-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-019-00849-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-019-00849-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexandra Schosser & Birgit Senft & Marion Rauner, 2022. "The benefit of an ambulant psychiatric rehabilitation program in Vienna, Austria: an uncontrolled repeated measures study," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(1), pages 19-48, March.
    2. Ghazi I. Al Jowf & Ziyad T. Ahmed & Ning An & Rick A. Reijnders & Elena Ambrosino & Bart P. F. Rutten & Laurence de Nijs & Lars M. T. Eijssen, 2022. "A Public Health Perspective of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Johanna Katharina Hohls & Hans-Helmut König & Eleanor Quirke & André Hajek, 2021. "Anxiety, Depression and Quality of Life—A Systematic Review of Evidence from Longitudinal Observational Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-26, November.
    4. Megumi Hazumi & Kentaro Usuda & Emi Okazaki & Mayumi Kataoka & Daisuke Nishi, 2022. "Differences in the Course of Depression and Anxiety after COVID-19 Infection between Recovered Patients with and without a Psychiatric History: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-11, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:38:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s40273-019-00849-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.