IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v28y2010i11p1041-1054.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Evaluation of Cinacalcet in the Treatment of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Mario Eandi
  • Lorenzo Pradelli
  • Sergio Iannazzo
  • Silvia Chiroli
  • Giuseppe Pontoriero

Abstract

Background: Imbalanced levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH), serumcalcium (Ca) and phosphorous (P) are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) death and fracture in dialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). The calcimimetic agent cinacalcet can attenuate the mineral and hormonal imbalances characteristic of SHPT and may improve outcomes in such patients. Here we describe a cost-utility analysis of cinacalcet for SHPT in dialysis patients in Italy. Methods: We developed a probabilistic Markov model to simulate the effect of cinacalcet on Ca, P and PTH levels in dialysis patients with SHPT, based on data from a European, multicentre, open-label study. The model then correlated these levels with mortality and morbidity (CV events, fractures and parathyroidectomies) using data from the literature, and incorporated Italian data for dialysis, drugs and management of events according to the national cost structure. The simulation horizon was patient lifetime; simulated treatment alternatives were standard treatment (mainly vitamin D sterols and phosphate binders) and cinacalcet + standard treatment.A 3.5% discount rate was applied to life expectancy (LE), quality-adjusted life-expectancy (QALE), costs and times below the upper ranges (time in range [TiR]) recommended by the National Kidney Foundation–Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality initiative for PTH, Ca, P and Ca × P. Utilities were derived from the published literature and took into account dialysis and the impairment of quality of life due to the occurrence of CV events and fractures. Costs were evaluated in year 2009 values from the perspective of the Italian National Healthcare System. Results: Baseline results were calculated with 10 000 iterations. Compared with standard treatment alone, addition of cinacalcet was associated with a mean (SD) increase in TiR of 5.26 (6.59), 3.63 (6.87), 1.70 (6.66) and 2.68 (5.55) discounted patient-years for PTH, Ca and P, respectively, and combined PTH, Ca, P and Ca × P. Cinacalcet increased LE by 1.20 (3.75) life-years (LYs) and QALE by 0.89 (2.59) QALYs. When including the cost for dialysis, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was €50 012 per LY and €67 361 per QALY, while, if dialysis costs were not included, the ICER was €23 473 per LY and €31 616 per QALY. Conclusions: The results suggest that cinacalcet treatment could be considered cost effective for treatment of SHPT in the Italian healthcare setting, but further investigations are needed to confirm these findings. Copyright Adis Data Information BV 2010

Suggested Citation

  • Mario Eandi & Lorenzo Pradelli & Sergio Iannazzo & Silvia Chiroli & Giuseppe Pontoriero, 2010. "Economic Evaluation of Cinacalcet in the Treatment of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Italy," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 28(11), pages 1041-1054, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:28:y:2010:i:11:p:1041-1054
    DOI: 10.2165/11538600-000000000-00000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2165/11538600-000000000-00000
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2165/11538600-000000000-00000?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Wit, G.Ardine & Ramsteijn, Paul G & de Charro, Frank Th, 1998. "Economic evaluation of end stage renal disease treatment," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 215-232, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sergio Iannazzo & Michela Carsi & Silvia Chiroli, 2012. "A cost-utility analysis of cinacalcet in secondary hyperparathyroidism in five European countries," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 127-138, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kontodimopoulos, Nick & Niakas, Dimitris, 2008. "An estimate of lifelong costs and QALYs in renal replacement therapy based on patients' life expectancy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 85-96, April.
    2. Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer & Milton C. Weinstein & Murray A. Mittleman & Robert J. Glynn & Joseph S. Pliskin, 2002. "Health Economic Evaluations: The Special Case of End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 22(5), pages 417-430, October.
    3. Mohsen Yaghoubi & Sonya Cressman & Louisa Edwards & Steven Shechter & Mary M. Doyle-Waters & Paul Keown & Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze & Stirling Bryan, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Kidney Transplantation Decision Modelling Studies," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 39-51, January.
    4. Sigrid M Mohnen & Manon J M van Oosten & Jeanine Los & Martijn J H Leegte & Kitty J Jager & Marc H Hemmelder & Susan J J Logtenberg & Vianda S Stel & Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen & G Ardine de Wit, 2019. "Healthcare costs of patients on different renal replacement modalities – Analysis of Dutch health insurance claims data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Alexander V van Schoonhoven & Judith J Gout-Zwart & Marijke J S de Vries & Antoinette D I van Asselt & Evgeni Dvortsin & Pepijn Vemer & Job F M van Boven & Maarten J Postma, 2019. "Costs of clinical events in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in the Netherlands: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Thomas W Ferguson & James Zacharias & Simon R Walker & David Collister & Claudio Rigatto & Navdeep Tangri & Paul Komenda, 2015. "An Economic Assessment Model of Rural and Remote Satellite Hemodialysis Units," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-11, August.
    7. Bernadette Li & John Cairns & James Fotheringham & Rommel Ravanan, 2016. "Predicting hospital costs for patients receiving renal replacement therapy to inform an economic evaluation," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(6), pages 659-668, July.
    8. Afiatin & Levina Chandra Khoe & Erna Kristin & Lusiana Siti Masytoh & Eva Herlinawaty & Pitsaphun Werayingyong & Mardiati Nadjib & Sudigdo Sastroasmoro & Yot Teerawattananon, 2017. "Economic evaluation of policy options for dialysis in end-stage renal disease patients under the universal health coverage in Indonesia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-10, May.
    9. Braden Manns & David Meltzer & Ken Taub & Cam Donaldson, 2003. "Illustrating the impact of including future costs in economic evaluations: an application to end‐stage renal disease care," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(11), pages 949-958, November.
    10. Joseph Menzin & Lisa Lines & Daniel Weiner & Peter Neumann & Christine Nichols & Lauren Rodriguez & Irene Agodoa & Tracy Mayne, 2011. "A Review of the Costs and Cost Effectiveness of Interventions in Chronic Kidney Disease," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 29(10), pages 839-861, October.
    11. Sergio Iannazzo & Michela Carsi & Silvia Chiroli, 2012. "A cost-utility analysis of cinacalcet in secondary hyperparathyroidism in five European countries," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 127-138, March.
    12. Steef Redeker & Sohal Ismail & Hester V. Eeren & Emma K. Massey & Willem Weimar & Mark Oppe & Jan Busschbach, 2022. "A dynamic Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of the Kidney Team at Home intervention in The Netherlands," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(4), pages 597-606, June.
    13. Gijs Van de Wetering & Willem H. Woertman & Eddy M. M. Adang, 2012. "A model to correct for short‐run inefficiencies in economic evaluations in healthcare," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(3), pages 270-281, March.
    14. Just, Paul Michael & Riella, Miguel Carlos & Tschosik, Elizabeth Ann & Noe, Leslie Lyle & Bhattacharyya, Samir Kumar & de Charro, Frank, 2008. "Economic evaluations of dialysis treatment modalities," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(2-3), pages 163-180, May.
    15. Charles Christian Adarkwah & Afschin Gandjour & Maren Akkerman & Silvia M Evers, 2011. "Cost-Effectiveness of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors for the Prevention of Diabetic Nephropathy in The Netherlands – A Markov Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-10, October.
    16. Peeters, Pascale & Rublee, Dale & Just, Paul M. & Joseph, Alain, 2000. "Analysis and interpretation of cost data in dialysis: review of Western European literature," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 209-227, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:28:y:2010:i:11:p:1041-1054. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.