IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v24y2006i2p29-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What an Informed Patient Means for the Future of Healthcare

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth Parker

Abstract

Professionalism is the basis of medicine’s contract with society, and the principle of patient autonomy is a fundamental value of our profession. Physicians must respect patient autonomy by being honest and empowering patients to make informed decisions about their health. What information do patients need to understand in order to be able to take care of their health? How do we make sure that information is adequately communicated so that everyone who needs it can access and understand it? Health literacy is increasingly recognised as essential for successful access, navigation, self-care and management of health and wellness in America. Unfortunately, there is a large gap between the literacy demands of the health system and the health literacy skills of most Americans. A recent Institute of Medicine report concludes that nearly half of American adults have difficulty understanding and acting upon health information. Low health literacy is associated with less knowledge of diseases and self-care, worse self-management skills, lower medication compliance rates, higher rates of hospitalisation and worse health outcomes. Health literacy problems are magnified as patients are increasingly asked to take more responsibility for their health in a healthcare system that is increasingly complex, specialised and technologically sophisticated. Most would agree that is it hard to be a patient these days; health literacy is needed for navigating and understanding what you need to do. Improving health literacy is essential for improving quality, reducing disparities and reducing costs. Copyright Adis Data Information BV 2006

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth Parker, 2006. "What an Informed Patient Means for the Future of Healthcare," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 29-33, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:24:y:2006:i:2:p:29-33
    DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200624002-00004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2165/00019053-200624002-00004
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2165/00019053-200624002-00004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lukas, Daniel, 2010. "Patient autonomy and education in specific medical knowledge," Dresden Discussion Paper Series in Economics 07/10, Technische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Business and Economics, Department of Economics.
    2. Elham Charoghchian Khorasani & Seyedeh Belin Tavakoly Sany & Mehrsadat Mahdizadeh & Hassan Doosti & Hadi Tehrani & Mohammad Moghzi & Alireza Jafari & Nooshin Peyman, 2022. "Attributes of Organizational Health Literacy in Health Care Centers in Iran: A Qualitative Content Analysis Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Marie-Anne Durand & Renata W Yen & James O’Malley & Glyn Elwyn & Julien Mancini, 2020. "Graph literacy matters: Examining the association between graph literacy, health literacy, and numeracy in a Medicaid eligible population," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:24:y:2006:i:2:p:29-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.