IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v5y2012i3p147-162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Expected Outcomes between Patients and Neurologists Using Kano’s Methodology in Symptomatic Migraine Treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Matías-Guiu
  • M. Caloto
  • G. Nocea

Abstract

Kano’s methodology is a useful tool to analyze differences in migraine treatment expectations among patients and neurologists. The main difference between patients and neurologists related to basic priorities. Therefore, when selecting treatment for migraine, physicians should invite the patient to participate in the decision making of which treatment is more appropriate. Copyright Springer International Publishing AG 2012

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Matías-Guiu & M. Caloto & G. Nocea, 2012. "Comparison of Expected Outcomes between Patients and Neurologists Using Kano’s Methodology in Symptomatic Migraine Treatment," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 5(3), pages 147-162, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:5:y:2012:i:3:p:147-162
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03262488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF03262488
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03262488?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aleksandra Torbica & Carla Rognoni & Rosanna Tarricone, 2021. "Investigating Patients’ Preferences to Inform Drug Development Decisions: Novel Insights from a Discrete Choice Experiment in Migraine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-18, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:5:y:2012:i:3:p:147-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.