IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v1y2008i3p151-163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding and Assessing the Impact of Alcoholism on Quality of Life

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Reaney
  • Colin Martin
  • Jane Speight

Abstract

Alcoholism has the potential to impact on the quality of life (QOL) of an ‘alcoholic,’ their family, and friends in both the short and long term. Consequently, increasing significance has been placed on understanding health issues from the patient’s perspective, evaluating the patient’s subjective experience of his/her symptoms (as well as any treatment), and the impact of these on his/her QOL. The objective of this review was to identify and evaluate the content validity of measures used to assess health-related QOL (HR-QOL) in alcoholism (alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence). Systematic searches of Scopus (1990–2007) were conducted using terms synonymous with alcoholism combined with terms associated with measuring HR-QOL. A total of 618 abstracts were identified, detailing the use of 16 generic patient-reported outcome measures to assess HR-QOL in alcoholism. Upon further examination of item content, seven measured generic health status and nine assessed generic QOL or life satisfaction (with varying definitional criteria and domain focus). The SF-36 and EQ-5D, in particular, have been used widely, but were misinterpreted frequently as measures of HR-QOL rather than health status. One alcohol-specific measure was identified: the AlQoL 9, a scale that some have claimed to epitomize alcohol-related QOL. However, the AlQoL 9 was developed by reducing the SF-36 (French version) to the nine items most relevant to alcoholism. The methodology for determining the relevance of the existing items of the SF-36 was comprehensive but the adapted measure does not include assessment of additional concepts (such as sleep and social isolation) of particular importance for alcohol-related QOL. There is a lack of research and assessment of HR-QOL in alcoholism and alcohol abuse, and our assessment of the content validity of existing measures used to date suggests that many are likely to be inadequate. Given the insufficiencies of generic measures and the limited applicability of the AlQoL 9, there is a need for an alcoholism-specific QOL measure that focuses on the domains that are most salient to people with such problems. Individuals need to be given the opportunity to determine the extent to which their QOL is impaired by alcoholism based upon their own criteria for what constitutes good HR-QOL. Only then will we be able to assess the full impact of alcoholism (and its treatment) on QOL. Copyright Adis Data Information BV 2008

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Reaney & Colin Martin & Jane Speight, 2008. "Understanding and Assessing the Impact of Alcoholism on Quality of Life," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 1(3), pages 151-163, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:1:y:2008:i:3:p:151-163
    DOI: 10.2165/1312067-200801030-00002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2165/1312067-200801030-00002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2165/1312067-200801030-00002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raed Tayyem & Abdulmajid Ali & John Atkinson & Colin Martin, 2011. "Analysis of Health-Related Quality-of-Life Instruments Measuring the Impact of Bariatric Surgery," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 4(2), pages 73-87, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:1:y:2008:i:3:p:151-163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.