IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v18y2025i3d10.1007_s40271-025-00734-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unveiling Preferences in Closed Communities: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) Questionnaire to Elicit Ultra-Orthodox Women Preferences for Video Consultations in Primary Care

Author

Listed:
  • Irit Chudner

    (University of Haifa)

  • Anat Drach-Zahavy

    (University of Haifa)

  • Batya Madjar

    (Haifa District Health Office, Ministry of Health)

  • Leah Gelman

    (University of Haifa)

  • Sonia Habib

    (Haifa District Health Office, Ministry of Health)

Abstract

Background Video consultations in primary care settings demonstrate substantial benefits, including improved accessibility, reduced waiting times, and enhanced health management. These services could particularly benefit ultra-Orthodox women in Israel, who typically manage large families and face unique healthcare access challenges as primary caregivers. However, eliciting preferences within this closed religious community presents distinct methodological challenges because of cultural sensitivities and religious restrictions regarding technology use. Objective We aimed to develop and validate a culturally sensitive, discrete choice experiment questionnaire for eliciting ultra-Orthodox women’s preferences regarding video versus in-clinic consultations in primary care settings. Methods A three-stage mixed-methods approach was employed: (1) 33 semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders (women, men, rabbis, and healthcare providers) to identify attributes and levels; (2) an attribute-ranking exercise with 88 ultra-Orthodox women to refine attributes; and (3) cognitive interviews with 15 women to validate the discrete choice experiment questionnaire. Results Four key attributes emerged as most important for ultra-Orthodox women when choosing between video and in-clinic consultations: (1) consultation timing (regular hours/after 20:00); (2) travel time; (3) waiting time; and (4) familiarity with the healthcare provider. Importantly, the study revealed the necessity for a dedicated device exclusively for healthcare provider communication, closed to open Internet networks, as a fundamental prerequisite for implementing video consultations in this community. Additional unique findings emerged through this methodological process, contributing to the understanding of technological adoption in closed religious patients’ communities. Conclusions This study provides a comprehensive example of implementing pre-discrete choice experiment stages while addressing unique considerations of a special population. The findings provide a framework for developing inclusive telemedicine services for traditionally underserved populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Irit Chudner & Anat Drach-Zahavy & Batya Madjar & Leah Gelman & Sonia Habib, 2025. "Unveiling Preferences in Closed Communities: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) Questionnaire to Elicit Ultra-Orthodox Women Preferences for Video Consultations in Primary Care," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 18(3), pages 263-277, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:18:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s40271-025-00734-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00734-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-025-00734-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-025-00734-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:18:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s40271-025-00734-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.