Author
Listed:
- Nicola Williamson
(Adelphi Values, Patient-Centered Outcomes)
- Chloe Howse
(Adelphi Values, Patient-Centered Outcomes)
- Nicola Hodson
(Adelphi Values, Patient-Centered Outcomes)
- Julia Stein
(Adelphi Values, Patient-Centered Outcomes)
- Rob Arbuckle
(Adelphi Values, Patient-Centered Outcomes)
Abstract
Qualitative in-trial interviews with clinical trial participants are a means of providing rich, in-depth patient experience data to supplement and complement data captured by clinical outcome assessments and other clinical trial efficacy endpoints. Such in-trial interview data can be used to build understanding of disease and treatment experiences, evaluate content validity of clinical outcome assessments, aid interpretation of scores and meaningful changes, inform trial design feasibility and operational considerations, and provide supportive evidence regarding safety, efficacy, and effectiveness. Despite the rapid growth of in-trial interviews as part of clinical development programs in the pharmaceutical industry in recent years, published guidelines regarding the methods, conduct, and implementation of in-trial interviews are scarce. Drawing on published examples and the authors’ experiences of conducting in-trial interview studies, this article provides an overview of best practice methods for implementing this methodology (including considerations for study design, sample size, interview conduct, and analysis) and the value of in-trial interview data to answer specific research questions. Operational and logistical considerations are outlined, including recommendations for country selection, site selection, training and communication, adverse event safety reporting, and data management and handling. Well-designed and carefully implemented in-trial interviews can lead to generation of insightful patient experience data that are truly of value to inform regulators, health technology agencies, clinicians, patients, and caregivers about product attributes and the impact of diseases and treatments on patients’ lives.
Suggested Citation
Nicola Williamson & Chloe Howse & Nicola Hodson & Julia Stein & Rob Arbuckle, 2025.
"Qualitative In-trial Interviews: Methods, Challenges, and Best Practice,"
The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 18(3), pages 199-209, May.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:patien:v:18:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s40271-024-00726-2
DOI: 10.1007/s40271-024-00726-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:18:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s40271-024-00726-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.