Author
Listed:
- Kevin Marsh
(Evidera)
- Juan Marcos Gonzalez Sepulveda
(Duke University)
- Conny Berlin
(Novartis)
- Bennett Levitan
(Janssen Research & Development)
- Marco Boeri
(OPEN Health)
- Catharina G. M. Groothuis-Oudshoorn
(University of Twente)
- Norah L. Crossnohere
(The Ohio State University)
- Cecilia Jimenez-Moreno
(Kielo Research)
- Barry Liden
(USC Schaeffer Center)
- Isabelle Stoeckert
(Bayer)
- Jorien Veldwijk
(Erasmus University Rotterdam)
- Stephen Watt
(Pfizer)
- Brett Hauber
(Pfizer)
Abstract
Using patient preference information (PPI) to incorporate patient voices into the drug development lifecycle can help align therapies with the needs and values of patients. However, several barriers have limited the use of PPI, including a lack of clarity on its use by decision-makers, a need for greater decision-maker trust in PPI, and a lack of time, budgets, and access to specialist expertise. The value proposition for PPI could be enhanced by making it FAIR: Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable. To support the development of a research agenda to deliver FAIR PPI, we reviewed related endeavors in the development of repositories of existing studies, disease models, benefit transfer, and common data standards. We concluded that developing FAIR PPI would require advances in the science of PPI, including the establishment of a consortium, mirroring the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) or Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OPOM), to develop PPI data standards, and research into the sources of variation in patient preferences. This will require the science of PPI to graduate from being a body of empirical observations to developing theories that explain variations in patient preferences, simultaneously driving both efficiency in the generation of PPI and trust in PPI.
Suggested Citation
Kevin Marsh & Juan Marcos Gonzalez Sepulveda & Conny Berlin & Bennett Levitan & Marco Boeri & Catharina G. M. Groothuis-Oudshoorn & Norah L. Crossnohere & Cecilia Jimenez-Moreno & Barry Liden & Isabel, 2025.
"What Next for the Science of Patient Preference? Interoperability, Standardization, and Transferability,"
The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 18(2), pages 101-108, March.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:patien:v:18:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s40271-025-00727-9
DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00727-9
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:18:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s40271-025-00727-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.