IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v18y2025i2d10.1007_s40271-024-00719-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patients and Spine Surgeons’ Perspectives regarding Decision-Making and Outcomes in Lumbar Surgery: An Exploratory, Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Ling Jie Cheng

    (National University of Singapore)

  • Nan Luo

    (National University of Singapore)

  • Le Ann Chen

    (National University of Singapore)

  • Jing Ying Cheng

    (National Healthcare Group)

  • Gabriel Ka Po Liu

    (National University Hospital
    National University of Singapore)

  • Wenru Wang

    (National University of Singapore)

  • Hwee Weng Dennis Hey

    (National University Hospital
    National University of Singapore)

  • Vivien Xi Wu

    (National University of Singapore)

Abstract

Background Decision-making in lumbar surgery for degenerative conditions is influenced by various factors, including patient expectations and empowerment. The role of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in guiding these decisions is underexplored. This study aims to understand the perspectives of patients and spine surgeons in decision-making for lumbar surgery and explore their perspectives on the relevance and influence of pre- and post-surgery PROs. Methods An exploratory qualitative study was conducted between February 2022 and November 2023. A total of 15 patients with degenerative lumbar conditions and 9 spine surgeons from 5 tertiary public hospitals in Singapore were recruited. Data were analyzed using a framework analysis approach, ensuring validity through member checking, reflexive journals, and data source triangulation. Results Three overarching categories emerged: “expectations and outcomes,” “decision empowerment,” and “surgical experiences.” There is a shift toward shared decision-making, highlighting the importance of patient-centric approaches. Surgical decisions are primarily influenced by PROs, particularly health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and pain relief. Patients prioritize pain relief and improvements in daily functioning, while surgeons also emphasize avoiding postoperative complications. Decision support tools, including PRO data, are essential but need better accessibility and integration within clinical settings. Positive surgical experiences are driven by clear communication, trust with surgeons, swift recovery, and no regrets post-surgery. Conclusions Our study emphasizes the importance of patient-centered approaches in lumbar surgery decision-making, particularly regarding pre- and post-surgery PROs. Implementing these approaches may enhance patient satisfaction and surgical outcomes, urging the surgical community to prioritize informed, empathetic decision-making to improve healthcare quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Ling Jie Cheng & Nan Luo & Le Ann Chen & Jing Ying Cheng & Gabriel Ka Po Liu & Wenru Wang & Hwee Weng Dennis Hey & Vivien Xi Wu, 2025. "Patients and Spine Surgeons’ Perspectives regarding Decision-Making and Outcomes in Lumbar Surgery: An Exploratory, Qualitative Study," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 18(2), pages 145-160, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:18:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s40271-024-00719-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-024-00719-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-024-00719-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-024-00719-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:18:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s40271-024-00719-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.