IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v17y2024i5d10.1007_s40271-024-00687-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing Communication on HPV Vaccination to Parents of 11- to 14-Year-Old Adolescents in France: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra Chyderiotis

    (Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Emerging Disease Epidemiology Unit)

  • Jonathan Sicsic

    (Université Paris Cité, LIRAES)

  • Amandine Gagneux-Brunon

    (CHU de Saint-Etienne-Service d’Infectiologie
    Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Team GIMAP, Université de Lyon, Université Jean Monnet, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Inserm, U1111, CNRS, UMR530
    CIC-Inserm, 1408, CHU de Saint-Etienne)

  • Jocelyn Raude

    (Univ. Rennes, EHESP, CNRS, Inserm, Arènes-UMR 6051, RSMS (Recherche sur les Services et Management en Santé)-U1309)

  • Anne-Sophie Barret

    (Santé Publique France)

  • Sébastien Bruel

    (Saint-Etienne-Lyon University
    University Claude Bernard, University of Lyon)

  • Aurélie Gauchet

    (Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, LIP/PC2S)

  • Anne-Sophie Duc Banaszuk

    (Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des cancers-Pays de la Loire)

  • Morgane Michel

    (Université Paris Cité, ECEVE, UMR 1123, Inserm
    Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Robert Debré, Unité d’épidémiologie clinique)

  • Bruno Giraudeau

    (Université de Tours, Université de Nantes, INSERM, SPHERE U1246, INSERM CIC 1415, CHRU de Tours)

  • Nathalie Thilly

    (Université de Lorraine, APEMAC
    Université de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy)

  • Judith E. Mueller

    (Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Emerging Disease Epidemiology Unit
    Univ. Rennes, EHESP, CNRS, Inserm, Arènes-UMR 6051, RSMS (Recherche sur les Services et Management en Santé)-U1309)

Abstract

Background With the aim to optimize communication during HPV vaccination campaigns in France, we elicited parental preferences around HPV vaccination. Methods We conducted a single-profile discrete choice experiment (DCE) among parents of 11- to 14-year-old middle-school pupils, who completed an anonymous, self-administered, internet-based questionnaire during 2020–2021. The DCE comprised five attributes (vaccine-preventable disease, justification of optimal age, information on safety, indirect protection and coverage) of vaccination against an unnamed disease that were presented to respondents in ten choice tasks, or scenarios. We use fixed effect logit models to estimate attribute weights on theoretical vaccine acceptance, and random effect linear regression to estimate attribute coefficients on vaccine eagerness (decision and decision certainty). We estimated marginal effects of attributes on expected vaccine acceptance. Results Vaccination scenarios were accepted by 55.6–89.2% of the 1291 participants. The largest marginal effects on expected vaccine acceptance in the full sample arose from prevention of cancer versus genital warts (+ 11.3 percentage points); from a “severe side effect suspicion that was not scientifically confirmed” versus a statement about “more benefits than risks” (+ 8.9 percentage points), and information on 80% vaccine coverage in neighbouring countries versus on “insufficient coverage” (+ 4.2 percentage points). Explaining the early age of vaccination by sexual debut had a strong negative impact among French monolingual parents with lower education level (vs age-independent, OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.27–0.86), but not other socio-economic groups. After removing low-quality responses (unvaried certainty and short questionnaire completion), among serial non-demanders with children not vaccinated against HPV, only disease elimination impacted vaccine eagerness positively (coefficient 0.54, 0.06–1.02). Discussion Using DCEs to elicit parents’ preferences around communication messages, notably on cancer prevention, vaccine coverage and information about vaccine safety, could help to optimize HPV vaccination promotion efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra Chyderiotis & Jonathan Sicsic & Amandine Gagneux-Brunon & Jocelyn Raude & Anne-Sophie Barret & Sébastien Bruel & Aurélie Gauchet & Anne-Sophie Duc Banaszuk & Morgane Michel & Bruno Giraudeau & , 2024. "Optimizing Communication on HPV Vaccination to Parents of 11- to 14-Year-Old Adolescents in France: A Discrete Choice Experiment," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 17(5), pages 575-588, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:17:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-024-00687-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-024-00687-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-024-00687-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-024-00687-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carol Mansfield & Jessie Sutphin & Marco Boeri, 2020. "Assessing the impact of excluded attributes on choice in a discrete choice experiment using a follow‐up question," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(10), pages 1307-1315, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Veronica Dorgali & Alberto Longo & Caroline Vass & Gemma Shields & Roger Harrison & Riccardo Scarpa & Marco Boeri, 2022. "A General Public Study on Preferences and Welfare Impacts of Antimicrobial Resistance in the United Kingdom," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 65-76, January.
    2. Samare P. I. Huls & Emily Lancsar & Bas Donkers & Jemimah Ride, 2022. "Two for the price of one: If moving beyond traditional single‐best discrete choice experiments, should we use best‐worst, best‐best or ranking for preference elicitation?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(12), pages 2630-2647, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:17:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-024-00687-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.