IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v17y2024i4d10.1007_s40271-024-00688-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diabetes Research Matters: A Three-Round Priority-Setting Survey Consultation with Adults Living with Diabetes and Family Members in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Christel Hendrieckx

    (Deakin University
    The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria
    Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University)

  • Sienna Russell-Green

    (Deakin University
    The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria)

  • Timothy Skinner

    (The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria
    La Trobe University)

  • Ashley H. Ng

    (Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre)

  • Chris Lee

    (National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation)

  • Siobhan Barlow

    (Diabetes Research Matters Steering Group)

  • Alan Davey

    (Diabetes Research Matters Steering Group)

  • Caitlin Rogers

    (Diabetes Research Matters Steering Group)

  • Elizabeth Holmes-Truscott

    (Deakin University
    The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria
    Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University)

  • Jane Speight

    (Deakin University
    The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria
    Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University)

Abstract

Objective We aimed to identify the health and quality-of-life research priorities of Australians with diabetes or family members. Methods Through an iterative, three-step, online survey process we (1) qualitatively generated research topics (long list) in response to one question “What research is needed to support people with diabetes to live a better life?”; (2) determined the most important research questions (short list); and (3) ranked research questions in order of importance (priorities). We aimed to recruit N = 800 participants, with approximate equal representation of diabetes type and family members. Results Participants (N = 661) were adults (aged 18+ years) in Australia with a self-reporting diagnosis of diabetes (type 1, n = 302; type 2, n = 204; prior/current gestational, n = 58; less common types, n = 22, or a family member, n = 75). Retention rates for Surveys 2 and 3 were 47% (n = 295) and 50% (n = 316), respectively. From 1549 open-text responses, 25 topics and 125 research questions were identified thematically. Research priorities differed by cohort, resulting in specific lists developed and ranked by each cohort. The top-ranked research question for the type 1 diabetes cohort was “How can diabetes technology be improved …?” and for the type 2 diabetes cohort: “How can insulin resistance be reversed …?”. One question was common to the final lists of all cohorts: “What are the causes or triggers of diabetes?” Within cohorts, the top priorities were perceived as being of similar importance. Conclusions The research priorities differ substantially by diabetes type and for family members. These findings should inform funding bodies and researchers, to align future research and its communication with community needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Christel Hendrieckx & Sienna Russell-Green & Timothy Skinner & Ashley H. Ng & Chris Lee & Siobhan Barlow & Alan Davey & Caitlin Rogers & Elizabeth Holmes-Truscott & Jane Speight, 2024. "Diabetes Research Matters: A Three-Round Priority-Setting Survey Consultation with Adults Living with Diabetes and Family Members in Australia," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 17(4), pages 441-455, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:17:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-024-00688-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-024-00688-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-024-00688-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-024-00688-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:17:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-024-00688-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.